Another religious freedom victory...

June 27, 2017

Another victory for religious freedom from the Supreme Court: the SCOTUS ruled 7-2 in the case of Trinity Lutheran v. Missouri that the state violated a church preschool’s constitutional rights by barring it from applying for a state grant for aid to resurface its playground with rubber from the state’s tire recycling program. The state claimed it was a violation of separation of church and state, but the majority wrote that “this Court has repeatedly confirmed that denying a generally available benefit solely on account of religious identity imposes a penalty on the free exercise of religion.” In other words, the grant wouldn’t be used to promote religion; it was just to resurface a school playground, and denying the school the same benefit as all other schools just because it has a religious connection is religious discrimination.

Interesting note on the liberal Justices: Sotomayor seemed to strongly dissent, Ginsburg joined her dissent, but in a hopeful sign for people of faith, Kagan voted with the majority in favor of the church school.

The SCOTUS also agreed to hear an appeal from a cake maker with religious objections to being forced to make same-sex wedding cakes.

As for today’s big questions (Trump’s travel ban and whether Justice Kennedy will announce his retirement), no word yet on either. Stay tuned.

READ MORE

No Comments

Another religious freedom victory...

June 27, 2017

Another victory for religious freedom from the Supreme Court: the SCOTUS ruled 7-2 in the case of Trinity Lutheran v. Missouri that the state violated a church preschool’s constitutional rights by barring it from applying for a state grant for aid to resurface its playground with rubber from the state’s tire recycling program. The state claimed it was a violation of separation of church and state, but the majority wrote that “this Court has repeatedly confirmed that denying a generally available benefit solely on account of religious identity imposes a penalty on the free exercise of religion.” In other words, the grant wouldn’t be used to promote religion; it was just to resurface a school playground, and denying the school the same benefit as all other schools just because it has a religious connection is religious discrimination.

Interesting note on the liberal Justices: Sotomayor seemed to strongly dissent, Ginsburg joined her dissent, but in a hopeful sign for people of faith, Kagan voted with the majority in favor of the church school.

The SCOTUS also agreed to hear an appeal from a cake maker with religious objections to being forced to make same-sex wedding cakes.

As for today’s big questions (Trump’s travel ban and whether Justice Kennedy will announce his retirement), no word yet on either. Stay tuned.

READ MORE

No Comments

You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...