Advertisement

Latest News

December 26, 2022
|

We all knew a kid in school who just had to run everything. Remember the classmate who insisted on picking the games you’d all play at recess, where you’d go after school, even who was “in” or “out” of your group? In high school, that kid had a compulsive need to be the leader of every student organization. You just wanted to say, “Hey! You’re not the boss of me!” Whatever happened to those kids? I wouldn’t be surprised if most ended up in government. We certainly have no shortage of people there who think they know how to live your life and spend your paycheck better than you do.

I’m convinced the world is divided into people who just want to live their own lives and those who, for some reason, have an uncontrollable urge to tell everyone else how to live. Unfortunately, to that latter group, government seems like the ideal place to work, and at the moment, they are getting 99.9% of all the attention from the media. As more of them gravitated toward government, Congress abdicated much of its legislating authority to unelected bureaucrats. Their bureaus grew like kudzu, and so did their regulations with the force of law (but no input from the people.) Then one day, we looked up and discovered we had a crushing national debt and were paying huge salaries to an army of people who enforce how big your soda should be and who couldn’t be fired and who is allowed to come into your daughter’s locker room. That’s when sane people realized that government is the LAST place these out-of-control control freaks needed to be.

The temptation for government to overreach is hardly new. In fact, it stretches back to the beginning of recorded history, and I bet even earlier than that. There’s a story in the ninth chapter of the book of Judges in the Old Testament about Gideon’s son Abimelech, who craved leadership and stature - not to serve the people but to control them and make them serve him. He said, “Give me dominion over your lives, and I will simplify your existence.” Wow, does that sound familiar? It’s basically the entire Democratic platform. Our government has taken us pretty far down that same road, but does your life seem any simpler -- or just a lot less free?

Anyway, back to Abimelech. He had a very smart younger brother, Jotham, who came up with a clever tale about three trees: an olive tree, a fig tree, and a vine tree. All three were fine trees that produced lots of fruit. All were offered the exalted position of “King Of All Trees,” but all three turned it down. The plant that wanted to be “King Of All Trees” was the bramble bush, a weak plant that produces no fruit at all. Jotham’s point was that only the weak and nonproductive have the desire to rule everyone else. Does that lesson not resonate like a gong right now?

When anyone aspires to a position of power, take a long, hard look. If that person seemingly crawled out of the cradle with an ambition to be President, then beware! Anytime someone talks about “running the country,” alarm bells should sound. No one – not the President, not Congress, no one person – “runs the country” or should aspire to.

That’s why the Founders took such pains to divide and limit federal power, and why we need to reinstate those limits that have been trampled in recent years, whether by Presidents ruling via executive order or out-of-control judges legislating from the bench or unelected bureaucrats abusing their power to try to influence the results of elections. If we allow any one person or entity to ignore those limits and assume the power to run everything, we won’t be able to stop them when they run America into the ground.

We should pick leaders who resemble the trees in the Bible story that don’t need or crave power but that have shown they bear good fruit. As it is said, by their fruits ye shall know them. Government has more than enough nuts already.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

More Stories

Remembering September 11th

The Meaning of Memorial Day

Comments 91-100 of 142

  • George R Wadding

    11/25/2022 07:24 PM

    Without exception term limits corrupt. As you point out, incumbents create far too many laws which are then put into regulations that are at the root of out current difficulties. It is the most serious omission in the Founders work.

  • Lynne Lippard

    11/25/2022 07:21 PM

    I really want our election process CLEANED up-the cheating has got to stop & those that cheat need to be punished!!!

  • Robert E. Carter

    11/25/2022 07:15 PM

    On the issue of non-elected bureaucrats in government, they should be held to even tighter standards by those who hire them, and subject to immediate termination (and possible "black-balling" if necessary), so they don't ruin the reputations of those who they work for, now or later.

  • Merle Cramton

    11/25/2022 07:11 PM

    Your , THOUGHTS ON LEADERSHIP, are right on point! I would add, some of them are just looking for a free ride at our expense ! ( I would add, that, that expense is quite a bit higher than most of the working class ever makes ! ! !)

  • Joanne Millhorn

    11/25/2022 07:07 PM

    Unfortunately, those who do not have a biblical worldview do not understand or agree with these:

    Mark 9:35 " . . . If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all, and servant of all."
    Mark 10:44 "And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all."

    The view of a government position at any level as an opportunity for service is generally a foreign concept in our government and reflects a culture that has rejected God.

  • Karen Rudisill

    11/25/2022 07:04 PM

    I think that some of the people in office do a fantastic job and could probably server more time than is current on the books.

    I also think there need to be an age limit as well!!

    Biden and Peloso need to go.

  • Amarllis Hazlip

    11/25/2022 06:53 PM

    I totally agree.

  • Michael Setzer II

    11/25/2022 06:50 PM

    Wonder how the number of terms in House and Senate have changed thru the history.
    Did original house/senate members stay for long times, or did it only start at some point, and if so, what seemed to set it off. Sure it had something to do with POWER and MONEY, and nothing to do with serving the People...

  • Kristine

    11/25/2022 06:50 PM

    Politicians need term limits because without them they forget they are public servants!

  • David Brandt

    11/25/2022 06:50 PM

    I could not agree more with the above. In the late seventies, I had the misfortune of representing the School Board and City Council, to which I had been elected, in both Sacramento and Washington, D.C. The learning curve was noticeably short in proving what I suspected I would face, the bureaucracy of both Capitals had built a stonewall around their fiefdom, and nobody else was allowed access. Luckily, unlike now, we still had a few members of the House. From California's standpoint, at least one Senator, Sam Hayakawa, also believed as we do that less government and much less bureaucracy was far superior to the maze and cesspool of Washington. I won more than I lost in both Capitals, but only because Orange County had some excellent representation, certainly not because of an inviting or helpful bureaucracy.