Advertisement

Latest News

November 23, 2022
|

Former Trump attorney general Bill Barr appears to be working overtime to damage Trump ahead –- far ahead –- of the 2024 GOP nomination for President. Though he says (to his credit) that he could never vote for a so-called progressive Democrat because of the damage such a person might do to the country, he is very much against Trump being the Republican nominee.

Last week, his anti-Trump rhetoric got so vehement that on Monday, we played a game called “Who Said It --- Bill Barr or Peter Strzok.” It really is quite challenging these days to tell the difference between what Barr says about Trump and what disgraced-and-fired FBI agent and Russia Hoaxer Strzok says. These were quotes from interviews that both took place on Friday, which happens to have been the day Attorney General Merrick Garland announced his appointment of Jack Smith as the new special counsel to investigate Trump over the Mar-A-Lago documents and his role in the January 6 riot. (How did you do on our quiz?)

On Monday, Barr spouted even more quotes in case we wanted to do an updated version of our game, in an op-ed for the NEW YORK POST headlined “Trump threatens to burn down the GOP, it’s time to move on.” Tell me, did Trump really threaten to burn down the GOP? I didn’t hear that, or anything close to that, and I don’t think he wants to do that, but let’s set that sensationalistic headline aside for the moment and take a thoughtful look at Barr’s commentary.

https://nypost.com/2022/11/21/trump-threatens-to-burn-down-the-gop-its-time-to-move-on

Barr does allow that Trump has strengths: he’s “clear and direct” in staking out a position (and, yes, that’s so refreshing!); he confronts difficult issues head-on; and he diagnosed and gives voice to the frustration of so many voters fed up with “progressive” Democrats, the elites and the media. Trump, like us, was sick of watching them preside over the decline of America.

Supporting Trump was an act of defiance, he points out, and that is true. Supporters liked the fact that he was over the top. “His voters felt that the left was taking a wrecking ball to the country,” he writes, “and they wanted to strike back with their own.” Also true.

Barr gives Trump credit for substantive achievements, such as “tax reform and deregulatory efforts” that “generated the strongest and most resilient economy in American history --- one that brought unprecedented progress to many marginalized Americans.” And Trump had begun to restore America’s military strength.

“[Trump] correctly identified the economic, technological and military threats to the United States posed by China’s aggressive policies,” Barr acknowledges. He brokered peace deals in the Mideast, accomplishing what many had thought impossible. He pulled us out of “ill-advised and detrimental agreements” with Russia and Iran. He finally fulfilled our promise to move our Israeli embassy to Jerusalem.

Yet, with all that he’s given Trump credit for, Barr can’t settle for what he did on the issues. Trump was petty and “made everything about himself,” he says. “If Trump had run his re-election campaign on that platform,” he says, “and dialed his churlishness back just a little, he would have won. But he lost because he insisted on running a campaign centered on whipping up his “base,” with a steady diet of “red meat.” Barr thinks that Trump isn’t really interested in broadening his appeal, that he’s “content to focus on intensifying his personal hold over a faction within the party.”

“The threat is simple,” Barr says, and here’s where NYP editors got their headline: “Unless the rest of the party goes along with him, he will burn the whole house down by leading ‘his people’ out of the GOP.” “Trump’s willingness to destroy the party if he does not get his way is not based on principle,” Barr says, “but on his own supreme narcissism. His egotism makes him unable to think of a political party as anything but an extension of himself –- a cult of personality.”

Unfortunately, it seems to be personality that Barr himself is mostly looking at. He says that in 2016, he “did not see [Trump] as our party’s standard-bearer.” Trump was “grossly self-centered, lacked self-control, and almost always took his natural pugnacity too far.” He found himself “cringing at his frequently juvenile, bombastic and petulant style.” Ah, Trump’s tweets.

And he’s still uneasy with Trump’s “wrecking ball style.” Never mind that in the years since Trump was first inaugurated, and especially since he left office, we’ve seen more and more that needs a wrecking ball taken to it, notably the DOJ that Barr led for some time. (Barr says Trump “failed”; what did Barr do to purge the DOJ of the deep-state bureaucracy that plagues it?)

As we noted on Monday, Barr said he thinks the special counsel will likely have enough evidence to indict Trump on charges related to his possession of documents at Mar-A-Lago. Never mind that the President has THE final authority over what documents are classified or declassified, which means the raid should never have taken place. Barr, of all people, should know this, so imagine the case of Trump Derangement Syndrome he must have to be able to ignore something so basic. He also seems to have ignored the blatantly partisan choice of this particular prosecutor; so far he’s said nothing.

Perhaps Barr is projecting his own TDS onto the voters when he says Trump himself lost the 2020 election and risks losing it all for the GOP in 2024. That seems to be his main concern about re-nominating the former President. He accuses Trump of tailoring his campaigning to his base --- that's such a condescending term, “base” --- and supplying them with the “red meat” they need. Sorry, I don’t agree. I and millions of others who supported Trump were not looking for “red meat.” If he wants to know why we voted for Trump, he should just look back at what he wrote himself about Trump’s strengths.

Many factors influenced the 2020 election. Covid, perhaps more than anything, and the logistical changes to the election process for which covid was the mere pretext, greatly affected the outcome. The collusion between the deep state and the dishonest media that suppressed stories damaging to Joe Biden was another huge factor. We don’t need to re-hash all that right now. For Barr to blame Trump’s loss in 2020 on his personal style is incredibly simplistic.

I think most of us in the GOP are taking a wait-and-see approach to the 2024 election; after all, it’s still two years away. We need to look at every candidate, and Trump might or might not be our eventual nominee. On the issues, though, we have consensus that he was a superb President. And given all the dark forces that have tried to take him down, it’s amazing –- almost superhuman –- that he is still standing and going strong. Perhaps he’s even learned to tone down his bombast when he sees it getting in the way of a particular goal. But Barr is trying so hard right now to talk us out of supporting him, one has to wonder if there’s something else behind it.

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

More Stories

A bounce back?

Inconvenient Truth

Comments 81-90 of 107

  • Charles Simmons

    11/23/2022 12:49 PM

    Barr has been a partisan political hack ever since the time of his participation in orchestrating the Rodney King episode of incipient wokeism. Barr is a do-gooder who illustrates the reality that the road to hell is paved with good intentions ..

  • Pennie Smith

    11/23/2022 12:47 PM

    Barr is a juvenile, egotistical, unintelligent, backstabbing RINO! He always has been and always will be! He was bought and paid for by the deep state and planted in President Trump's way! I wish no ill on anyone, but I do hope Karma visits ALL of these RINOs and turncoats! #TRUPM/LAKES2024

  • David Marney

    11/23/2022 12:44 PM

    paid for one of your 'kids book' things = arrived smelling awful= was for grandkids I'm 78 & ill...tossed books in trash= want no-to do with your company= can't afford it & product would never pass kids smell test...I really hope you do read these=I believe you honest = but might be being harmed from very stinky book co.

  • Raymond Willis

    11/23/2022 12:44 PM

    I agree with your interpretation that Baar and others focus on personality and style. But many voters also do. I was a strong supporter of Trump and would vote for him again IF he gets the nomination. But he needs to control his persona better. The bigger issue is the Republican tradition of internal fighting. I live in Colorado and there is no better example. The attacks on Trump by NR and many others do as much damage to winning in ‘24 as they accuse Trump of doing. All must reign in their personalities so that a Republican rather than just they becomes president. Tramp and the other wannabes better realize that soon.

  • cmcurry

    11/23/2022 12:42 PM

    Something in Bill Barr’s statement doesn’t add up. He admitted that Trump’s achievements were great for our country, but he won’t support him because Trump is a prima donna? We all know that. What is important is what’s best for the country.

  • Paula Herold

    11/23/2022 12:42 PM

    I place Barr and a never Trumper, those who caused what we have now in the White House and the undoing of many positive changes that came to be under DJT. Do I "like" his put-downs, sarcasm. Heaven's no. I focus on what he accomplished and am incredibly discusted with the never Trumpers and the RINOS. Do I think DJT is too old to be president in 2024? YES. I will vote for the Republican candidate no matter who it is. I think Ron DeSantis is the ideal candidate. I will always be sorry that DJT didn't win in 2020. We needed his four more years to MAGAgain. We have slid further down the slippery slope. Why cant our Rebublican leaders for once work together, respect each one's skills, and all together help our Great Nation to heal in every facet. Anything is possible with leadership and being what Patriotism Really Means....

  • Donna Bellifemine

    11/23/2022 12:34 PM

    Bill Barr is a looser, liar and 2020 election fraud denier. What he doesn't get is that we the people no longer want anyone that has been corrupted by the DC deep state or those that have made a career out of being in DC. Trump is and always will be an outsider mainly because he doesn't think like DC insiders and never will. Some in this country think it is a good thing that someone has a career in Washington because it gives them experience - NOT TRUE in this case it just means they had more time to evade their corrupt ways. There are very few House and Senate members that are true Patriots so having a career as a politician needs to end either by voting them out or term limits. If the president only gets a total of 8 years then all politicians should fall under the same rules. This change would get rid of the corrupt quickly. Bill Barr has now shown his true colors he is a RINO and needs to leave DC both physically and mentally. His time has passed and no one cares what he says along with Paul Ryan.. BYE BYE!!

  • Raymond Lengel

    11/23/2022 12:31 PM

    If Bill Barr is so vociferous in attacking Trump I have to wonder what he himself is hiding. It seems quite out of character and I was very surprised when I read his sentiments the other day.

  • Tom Kline

    11/23/2022 12:31 PM

    I do not have TDS. I did not read Barr’s statement, but simply the summary of his statements you posted. Except for the belief that Trump’s narcissistic self-centeredness that Trump has made everything about himself, and will destroy the Republican Party if he has to, I pretty much agree with what Barr said. I believe that his foolish tweets did him great harm, and that his wholly unChristian self- grandizement are not characteristics of a good leader. Selflessness is a quality of an effective leader, and Trump lacks that quality.
    I personally hope that DeSantis is on the ballot, but if Trump is on the ballot, I will vote for him. Even with his notable flaws, he is a better choice for the future of our Republic than any of the left-leaning possibilities.

    Another thought: if Michelle Obama is the Democrat candidate in 2024, I think the Florida governor, because he is part of a minority group, and from an immigrant family, has a better chance of beating her than a white billionaire.

  • Mark Mittelstaedt

    11/23/2022 12:27 PM

    Theranos was a good customer of mine. They were supposedly building a laser-based 'box' to do blood testing, Poor Ms. Holmes 'didn't like needles'. We made products to steer and shape laser beams in medical laser systems. I had to sign an NDA after waiting an hour in their lobby; I walked through a bull-pen full of engineers busy at computer monitors. I subsequently met with several of their so-called engineers. We had, or could collaborate with other companies, the equipment to rapidly locate laser beams with micron-scale precision on the 'cells' of the microfluidic 'chips' so the beams could 'interrogate' - measure reflection or transmission of a given wavelength ( color ) - to accomplish the measurements they presumably wanted to take. The engineers plainly didn't know what I was talking about, and seemed totally uninterested in building a working instrument. I thought that was strange at the time - even stranger was that Walgreens didn't ask to see a working box before they ponied up millions. The whole company was a total fraud.