Mike Huckabee
There is nothing in living memory that compares with this.
On January 20, Inauguration Day 2025, Biden signed two waves of blanket pardons for those who might later be connected to federal criminal offenses. (He’d already pardoned son Hunter, in advance of his sentencing.) These included Anthony Fauci (!); retired Gen. Mark Milley; all nine members of the “Select” J6 committee who “investigated” Trump’s alleged role in the January 6 riot and are accused of destroying evidence and collaborating with witnesses; and some members of the Capitol and DC Metro Police who testified before that committee. Biden used the pretext that Trump might exact “revenge” on these people (translation: Trump might dare to impose the rule of law on people who have broken it).
Dr. Fauci’s stunning “full and unconditional” pardon includes “any offenses against the United States which he may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014, through the date of this pardon, arising from or in any manner related to his service as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force or the White House COVID-19 Response Team, or as Chief Medical Advisor to the President.”
https://instapundit.com/697338/
For a satisfying moment of unintentional hilarity, let’s look back at what J6 “Select” Committee member Adam Kinzinger said just a couple of weeks ago about pardons: “I don’t want it...because the second you take a pardon, it looks like you’re guilty of something…” Indeed. So, is he going to turn down the pardon Biden has just handed him, or will he adopt the lame (and untrue) excuse of Trump exacting “revenge” so he can take cover behind a pardon after all? Here’s the video clip and some fun comments...
https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/01/20/kinzingers-snotty-commentary-about-needing-a-pardon-n2406986
Biden’s second wave of pardons, for his own extended family, reportedly took place just before Biden entered the Capitol Rotunda for Trump’s swearing in --- not long before he and Jill would be escorted onto the helicopter that would thankfully TAKE THEM AWAY (Ben Shapiro noted that the last helicopter departure from a disaster this big was in Vietnam.) It’s hard to imagine a more sniveling, cowardly move by a departing President. Here’s what Biden actually said in this order, and we’ll pause if you need to fall to the floor, laughing helplessly at the irony of it all:
“I believe in the rule of law, and I am optimistic that the strength of our legal institutions will ultimately prevail over politics. But baseless and politically motivated investigations wreak havoc on the lives, safety, and financial security of targeted individuals and their families. Even when individuals have done nothing wrong and will ultimately be exonerated, the mere fact of being investigated or prosecuted can irreparably damage their reputations and finances.”
Tell it to the J6 detainees. The BABYLON BEE could not have phrased it better. Biden continued...
“For any nonviolent offenses against the United States which they may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014, through the date of this pardon”...I give this “Executive Grant of Clemency” to “James B. Biden [Joe’s brother, Jim], Sara Jones Biden [Jim’s wife], Valerie Biden Owens [Joe’s sister], John T. Owens [Valerie’s husband], and Francis W. Biden [Joe’s other brother, Frank].”
And there’s that significant year of 2014 again. That’s the year that seems to have caught up son Hunter and other members of the Biden family.
https://instapundit.com/697333/
Among Biden’s many, many pardons and commutations, he also commuted the sentence of 80-year-old convicted murder Leonard Peltier, a native American who was convicted of killing two FBI agents in cold blood and later escaped from prison. He’ll be on home confinement.
FOX NEWS’ Sean Hannity had a fabulous segment on the pardons of family and cronies, including a clip from pre-emptively pardoned now-California Sen. Adam Schiff in 2020, talking hypothetically on MSNBC about pardons Trump might give...
Joy Reid: “Have you ever heard of somebody getting a [blanket] pre-emptive pardon who was innocent of all crime?...”
Schiff: “No….here, it’s an effort not only to prospectively pardon people for things they have not yet been charged with and may never be charged with, but also it’s the President’s own family...”
Sen. Chuck Schumer spoke about this as well, from the floor of the Senate: “The President’s reportedly asking his staff whether he can issue pre-emptive pardons for himself, his family members, Rudy Giuliani. There’s a simple answer: NO. No, Mr. President, that would be a gross abuse of the presidential pardon authority.”
This just gets more and more hilarious. President Trump got such grief for just looking into doing things (and deciding against) that Biden actually DID on a massive scale.
When Biden was asked in 2020 about the idea of Trump issuing pre-emptive pardons, he said, “Well, it concerns me in terms of what kind of precedent it sets and how the rest of the world looks at us as a nation of laws and, uh, injustice.” Presumably, at some point that concern went out the window.
Biden continued: “You’re not gonna see, in our administration, that kind of approach to pardons.” Yes, he actually said that. Apparently, he meant that his approach would be much MORE outrageous than Trump’s ever was.
And now, on his way out the door in 2025, Biden says of his pre-emptively pardoned family and friends, “Our nation owes these public servants a debt of gratitude for their tireless commitment to our country.” Really? Anthony Fauci and Liz Cheney? Very good summary here, highly recommended...
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/biden-trump-fauci/2025/01/20/id/1195711
As noted within, “It’s customary for a president to grant clemency at the end of his term, but those acts of mercy are usually offered to Americans who have been convicted of crimes. Biden has used the power in the broadest and most untested way possible: to pardon those who have not even been investigated yet. The decision lays the groundwork for an even more expansive use of pardons by Trump and future presidents.”
And that’s the danger with this. Biden’s scorched-earth approach, if not modified by the courts, could have a disastrous effect on our rule of law in future administrations, as Jacob Sullum explains in his article for REASON. This is the one to read, though we would argue that members of the J6 committee do, in fact, deserve to be investigated for crimes, such as witness tampering and obstruction of justice. It might take the Supreme Court to determine whether members of Congress can be.
The big problem here is that Biden’s broad use of the pardon power “could easily become a shield” for a president’s allies and administration officials who commit crimes. (We’ll include his family, too.) Take someone like Fauci, who allegedly lied about U.S. funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. With this pardon, we’ll never know if prosecutors could have proved this beyond a reasonable doubt, and he’ll also never be held to account.
If these pardons stand, future lawless presidential cohorts will essentially be able to do anything they want and be pardoned on their way out the door. This is SO OBVIOUS, it’s hard to believe everyone doesn’t immediately grasp it.
Jonathan Turley will no doubt have a lot to say on this in the coming days. On Monday, he said, “Biden has long exercised situational ethics, and with his powers coming to an end, the situation demanded that he cash out before his credit ended. In granting these pardons, Biden was seeking to protect not just his family but also himself. He was the object of the influence peddling and repeatedly lied to bury the scandal.”
“Reporters are now fully visible as willing dupes in one of the greatest corruption scandals in the history of this country.” (Some are still buying, or pretending to buy, Biden’s pretense for the pardons.)
Turley calls Biden’s move “the ultimate sign of contempt for the intelligence of the American public and the integrity of his office.” What integrity?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5096041-biden-pardons-family-corruption/
One way Biden’s pardons could backfire, though --- and we’ve talked about this --- is that they take Fifth Amendment protections away from people who no longer face criminal liability. Thus, if GOP committees continue their investigations, pardonees could find themselves on a congressional witness list, liable for prosecution if they don’t tell the truth (and Biden can’t let them wriggle out of that.) Time to get Dr. Fauci on the stand...
Of course, President Trump made news today with pardons, too, but in a good way, as his were a careful, case-by-case look at people who had obviously been targeted by a weaponized DOJ and railroaded in biased DC courtrooms. (That’s the kind of situation most people imagine when thinking of appropriate presidential pardons.) Most of these people had done precisely nothing and were nevertheless put through a legal nightmare simply because they supported Trump and were there that day.
These are the people Trump refers to as “the J6 hostages.” THE EPOCH TIMES has a good review...
Also, Trump has done something that should’ve happened years ago: he rescinded the security clearances of the 51 former intel officials who signed the “classic earmarks” letter about Hunter’s laptop being Russian disinformation, when they had not examined it and had no reason to conclude that. It was a political stunt, election interference that WORKED to elect Biden in 2020. Elon Musk is glad that “the hammer of justice has come”...
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1881522438531670271
In addition to taking away their security clearances (which they need to make the big bucks as private contractors), Trump also ordered his DNI and CIA head to investigate and report to him within 90 days on any other inappropriate activity related to that letter and recommend “any disciplinary action” that should be taken. We bet those 51 are sorry they’re among the few Biden cronies in DC who didn’t get preemptively pardoned.
Finally, we’ve been making fun of Biden’s pardons and having a good laugh at his expense, but for those whose lives were disrupted by the J6 prosecutions conducted by his weaponized DOJ, it’s not a joke. Investigative reporter Steve Baker, who finally ended up pleading guilty when facing a trial in DC for committing journalism, speaks here in this brief, must-see video about those whose lives have been affected far more than his has, he says --- the people who lost everything: their homes, spouses, careers, years of their lives. (We would add that some even committed suicide.) In most cases, these were innocent people who did nothing more than “walk through an open door at the Capitol on January 6,” yet their lives were destroyed.
“Thank you, President Trump,” he says as he chokes back tears, “for ending this nightmare for so many people. Thank you.”
Trump Takes Command
January 21, 2025
Mike Huckabee
Nothing in Joe Biden’s decades of government service was so contemptible, so unworthy of what the nation demands of its elected and unelected officials, as those disgraceful, last-minute pardons for his family and cronies – even while waiting in the White House for his successor’s arrival. In one breath-taking, all-too-improbable swoop, Mr. Biden revealed everything that his political and media allies stridently insisted for years were only the addled fantasies of his far-right opponents. And yet suddenly there was the Biden crime family standing naked and shivering in the clear, brutal sunlight of an arctic Inauguration Day. Highlighted by such infamy, the name Biden may ultimately rank alongside the Gambino’s, the Soprano’s or even Benedict Arnold himself; all were fellow-travelers governed only by self-interest.
Since only the guilty require pardons, the real question now is the extent of those artfully concealed damages. Since we must now assume that a succession of Bidenesque con artists systematically collaborated to acquire and conceal millions (or was it billions?) in ill-gotten gains, what American treasures must we now assume have been compromised, what mission-critical secrets sold at auction to empires grimly determined to purge us from the map? As one of their primary responsibilities, surely Mr. Trump’s new security team should be tasked with conducting a pitiless damage assessment. Historical precedent: When the badly startled Truman administration belatedly discovered that the Soviets – far from being loyal wartime allies - had systematically stolen the secrets of atomic bomb. In Calder Walton’s magisterial history, the surprise to US intelligence was so profound that it “blew apart the postwar international order and permanently changed relations between East and West.” https://www.amazon.com/Spies-
If there are degrees of infamy, then surely General Mark Milley’s name should be included in any damage assessment, regardless of his parallel pardon from Joe Biden. It was not enough that General Milley besmirched the name and reputation of Donald Trump, the president to whom the general owed uncompromising loyalty. First-order questions should include: Was General Milley involved directly or indirectly in the operations of the Biden crime family? Did he have any reason to suspect that the intimate, years-long business contacts between the Bidens and the PRC could have compromised American defense technology – or even our high-level intelligence sources and methods? If that sounds slightly paranoid, then remember that General Milley was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - the highest position in the American military establishment. In re-defining those duties with landmark legislation, Congress made clear tin 1986 hat the Chairman was directly responsible to the President, faithfully representing our armed services to their civilian masters. But that linkage runs in two directions: When you have clear evidence that the Big Guy has been compromised, then wisdom alone suggests the need for follow-on determinations. Are his closest associates involved as well?
The story about the Biden pardons was out-of-sight for most of Inauguration Day. Like millions of other Americans, my attention was captured by what our 47th President had to say about “the new American Golden Age” or “the revolution in common sense” that seemed to attract universal applause from every audience, no matter how frost-bitten. As a Texan, I cheered loudest when Mr. Trump swore to rebuild our badly overrun borders, to detain and expel criminal aliens and terrorist gangs like MS-13. It was not until the abbreviated First Honors ceremony - hastily re-located to the Capitol Hill Visitor’s Center - that I was visually reminded of just how small and hard-pressed our military has become. Each of our Armed Forces was represented by a platoon-sized honor guard; with flags and bands, probably less than 500 soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines.
Those folks, my beloved comrades-in-arms, today number less than half of one-percent of the American people! For over thirty years, the US Army pledged us to “fight out-numbered and win.” But I also learned an important truth from my Navy buddies, picked up from Admiral Lord Nelson, at the Battle of Trafalgar, way back during the Age of Sail: “Numbers annihilate.” Whether you are talking about drones, stealth fighters, tanks, ships or boots on the ground, those principles still apply to what the Soviets called “the constantly operating factors” of friction in the fog of war. Having voted for him three times, I will keep President Trump in my prayers, never forgetting that promises are one thing but that history is something else again.
Thanks, Mr. President and God bless you!
COL (Ret.) Ken Allard is a former West Point faculty member, Dean of the National War College and NBC News military analyst.
U.S.-Israel Alliance Strengthened | Huckabee Today
January 20, 2025
TRANSFORMATION in Washington | Huckabee Today
January 20, 2025
The Spinners perform
January 18, 2025
Mike's interview with Kid Rock
January 18, 2025
Mike interviews Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee
January 18, 2025
Mike's interview with Congressman James Comer
January 18, 2025
Mike's interview with Gary Sinise
January 18, 2025
Mike's interview with Scott Hamilton
January 18, 2025
Rich Little and Chonda Pierce
January 18, 2025
Mike Huckabee
TRUMP’S ECONOMIC MIRACLE Explained | Huckabee Today
January 15, 2025
Michelle O. to skip inaugural; why Trump should be sworn in INDOORS
January 15, 2025
by HUCKABEE writer/researcher Laura Ainsworth
Former First Lady Michelle Obama was conspicuously absent from President Jimmy Carter’s funeral at Washington National Cathedral last week. Everyone else one might have expected to be in attendance was there.
Melania Trump was there, of course, though funeral services must have been hard for her, as January 9 was the first anniversary of her mother’s death.
Michelle was reportedly in Hawaii; her office simply cited a scheduling conflict. CNN reported that she was on an “extended holiday vacation.” Commentary swirled, but my thought was just that she had been made aware of the “seating chart” ahead of time and knew she would have been seated between her husband and incoming President Trump, someone she obviously looks upon with disdain. That would have been enough for her to say no. I get the impression --- and her husband probably learned this long ago --- that it’s very, very easy for Michelle to say no. When she doesn’t give a flying fig about something, she says so.
(Aside: She likewise said no when we ALL KNOW the DNC tried to get her to run for President in 2024. That’s the reason Democrats were stuck with Vice President Kamala Harris --- the only other black female on the party’s bench --- as their virtually unelectable candidate. No matter how much “joy” they tried to manufacture about her campaign, it wasn’t enough to elect Kamala. It’ll be interesting to see if the leftists who all-too-often write history don’t end up blaming Michelle for Trump winning a second term.)
Anyway, now we have the announcement that Michelle will also not attend the inauguration of President Trump on January 20.
In a statement to the Associated Press, her office said, “Former President Barack Obama is confirmed to attend the 60th Inauguration Ceremonies. Former First Lady Michelle Obama will not attend the upcoming inauguration.” They did not provide a reason. According to the NEW YORK POST, all other former Presidents and First Ladies are expected to attend.
(It should be noted that both President Trump and Melania did not attend President Biden’s inauguration in 2020, but that was a considerably different situation, as Trump was still maintaining that Biden hadn’t really won. That’s an even more tenable theory today.)
RELATED: There are apparently plenty of bad feelings to go around. Many Democrat members of Congress, notably some of the “Squad” members, have said they’re not planning to go to Trump’s inauguration. I’m sure Trump is crying boo-hoo over that.
(According to David Jolly on MSNBC, millions of Americans will be saying Trump is “not my President.” If you recall, saying that about Obama in 2013 was racist, then saying it about Trump in 2017 was patriotic, then saying it about Biden in 2021 was treasonous, and now, saying it about Trump in 2025 is apparently patriotic again.)
Also, Kamala reportedly declined to invite VP-elect Vance and his wife, Second Lady Usha Vance, for the traditional courtesy visit to the Vice President’s residence at the Naval Observatory before the inauguration. With their three young children, the Vances could have benefited from a visit, just to see how their kids would be accommodated in the residence. But a staffer reportedly refused to answer their questions.
https://www.westernjournal.
Vance and his wife, according to FOX NEWS’ Sean Hannity Tuesday night, “had to rely on the permanent Navy staffers who run the residence to get the answers they needed.”
…..
But there are much larger considerations about Inauguration Day than whether Kamala’s office is displaying the expected pettiness or a cranky, out-of-sorts, totally non-supportive First Lady will deign to grace the event with her presence. The most important of all is whether or not the event will be safe for the President-elect and anyone standing anywhere near him when he takes the oath of office. As you know, we’re highly in favor of Trump re-thinking his decision to hold a victory rally in DC the day before --- though, thankfully, it will be indoors --- and even to have an open-air inauguration, though that has been the tradition.
Times change.
Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino has been expressing concerns about this all along, and that concern has not abated. He notes that no one with responsibility for Trump’s protection has reached out to him about the inauguration, though he would like them to, and that he is not a part of Trump’s transition team.
He did get an update on Monday, in a public briefing by the Secret Service that led him to reluctantly conclude that the inauguration is “probably not” safe.
“I’m just afraid that the people in charge, at the top of the Secret Service, and certainly at the FBI, do not know what they’re doing.”
Bongino said he was responsible for “the most important section” of the route taken by Obama during his first inauguration, including the part where Obama was to get out of his car. He’s saying that, given the dangers today, he would “be comfortable” with President Trump not getting out of the car at all, just foregoing the walk.
“I have not been briefed in on the security plan,” he said Tuesday. “I wish I was. I would like to review it myself, because I’ve done it before, and I want to see what they’re looking at. I know exactly what it’s supposed to look like.”
His major concern is with the FBI, to whom (like us) he says he gives “zero credibility.” An official with the FBI who is one of those responsible for the inaugural event says “they’re not tracking any threats to the inaugural ceremony or the Capitol complex.” Really?? How could there not be threats associated with Trump’s inauguration?
It’s barely possible this official is telling the truth, but who’s to say? Bongino believes there probably are very serious threats. “...There’s no reason to trust the FBI when it comes to anything regarding Donald Trump,” he says, “because they’ve been on the opposite side of the truth of nearly every major scandal involving the FBI.”
The Secret Service acting director, Ron Rowe, “screwed up bad,” Bongino said, “and he needs to go.” He’s just not qualified, based on what happened at the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, and on Trump’s golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida.
The Secret Service official in charge of the Washington field office (WFO), Matt McCool (yes, that’s his real name), was the one conducting the briefing; Bongino knows him well and considers him highly competent. McCool told reporters that they are in “a higher threat environment” than before and have “a slightly more robust security plan.” They “stay flexible” because it’s “an ever-changing threat environment.”
“...We are 100 percent confident in the plan that we have put in place for the inauguration,” McCool said, “that the public and our protectees will be safe.” So that reassured Bongino somewhat. But he says the Secret Service should no longer be in charge of what they call NSSEs, or National Special Security Events, of which the inauguration is one. “They should be a part of it, but they should not be in charge.” They should be responsible for the routine protection of top-level officials, not events like this.
“If you want to keep the President and his family alive,” Bongino said, “there’s only one way to do it. It’s to dump everything else the Secret Service does and focus on keeping him alive. It’s not complicated.”
The most critical threat at this inauguration --- the thing that makes it different from all past inaugurations --- is DRONES. Bongino is hearing from trusted sources that whatever plans they have for dealing with these “is not nearly as strong as they’re claiming.” McCool said in his briefing that the Secret Service is using drones of its own for its “protective posture,” and that we shouldn’t be “alarmed” if we see them in the sky during the inauguration or in the days leading up to it.
Still, “It’s this freaking air picture,” Bongino said, “that really scares the sh** out of me.” One thing that scares him is that so many in the Deep State still vow to resist Trump. He cites a new story in THE DAILY SIGNAL: “Deep State Gearing Up: Nearly Half of Federal Employees in the Swamp Plant to Resist Trump, Poll Finds.” That’s 42 percent of government managers. They have got to go, of course, but in the meantime, how can they be trusted to protect his life?
Reporter Susan Crabtree posted on X that the FAA “will set up temporary flight restrictions [TFRs] to other aircraft and drones for the Capitol region for inauguration day.”
But according to Bongino, TFRs are “like four-way stop signs; they’re basically suggestions.” Everybody has to follow the protocol, or “you’re gonna get an accident.”
It doesn’t help my confidence that Marjorie Taylor Green, flying into DC on Monday, posted on X that the pilot had announced he had to approach the airport from another direction because of “unauthorized drone activity” over the White House.
I don’t know if President Trump listens to a humble writer far from DC --- Dallas, Texas --- but I join with those who think he should NOT do the open-air inauguration at all. If he does choose to take the oath of office outside, he should at the very least not get out of his car and do “the walk.” Please, please don’t do it, Mr. President. You dodged a bullet once, but this would be tempting fate every bit as much as President Kennedy riding in an OPEN CONVERTIBLE on November 22, 1963. In Dallas.
Biden had 'schizophrenic' approach to foreign policy: Mike Huckabee | Wake Up America
January 15, 2025
“President Trump is a felon without a punishment.”
That was the 11AM Friday top-of-the-hour lead radio news headline on WBAP Radio in Dallas, the same station that runs conservative programming such as Dan Bongino and Mark Levin.
If Attorney General Merrick Garland and “Special Counsel” Jack Smith (and, come to think of it, presiding Judge Juan Merchan, who also acted as a de facto prosecutor) were listening to this, they must have thought, “Mission accomplished.”
Famed civil rights Attorney Alan Dershowitz will remember this as perhaps the low point for both our “justice” system and our media. As we discussed last week, he said he would forever refuse to call President Trump a “convicted felon,” noting that the President’s constitutional rights were thoroughly trashed and also that he is simply not guilty. Trump didn’t DO anything criminal.
And Dershowitz is joined by millions of other Americans who are horrified at what the legal system can do to an individual of their choosing. If they can do this to a billionaire President of the United States, we know they can destroy us. They can treat anyone in America as callously and even hatefully as they have treated Rudy Giuliani. Even if such a case is eventually reversed on appeal, as we expect Trump’s to be, “the process” is something they can turn on you to ruin your life. This is reminiscent of what Sen. Chuck Schumer famously said about the intel community, that they have “six ways from Sunday” for getting back at you. (The IRS does, too --- a story for another day.)
But in doing this to the incoming President of the United States, the weaponized legal system has shown itself utterly for what it is. “This convicted felon strategy is going to blow up in their faces, Wile. E. Coyote-style,” Bongino’s guest host “Producer Jim” said on Friday’s show about 15 minutes after the startling WBAP bulletin.
Judge Merchan said something almost beyond belief during Trump’s “sentencing” hearing last week, admitting that the case was “unique and remarkable” but that “once the courtroom doors were closed, the trial itself was no more special, unique and extraordinary than the other 32 cases in this courthouse.”
Oh, really? As Jonathan Turley said in his most recent column, “If so, that is a chilling indictment of the entire New York court system.”
Turley once described this case as “based on a ridiculous legal theory,” “more inflated than the Goodyear blimp” and also a “legal Frankenstein,” meaning that Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg unearthed a case from 2016 and “combining parts from both state and federal codes,” brought it back to life. And Merchan allowed a jury to convict without even having to agree on what had occurred in the case. (We’ll never know what their reasoning was on the “underlying crime.”)
As we discussed last week, civil rights attorney Alan Dershowitz has slammed the case and said he’d never call Trump “a convicted felon,” as he did nothing wrong. It is the New York legal system that is GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY.
“While heralded in court by Bragg’s office as the triumph of legal process, it is in fact the rawest and most grotesque form of lawfare,” Turley wrote. “Many will be blamed as the creators of this monster but few will escape that blame, including Merchan himself.”
And yet the Supreme Court let Judge Merchan go forward with the sentencing (actually the non-sentencing). One might be tempted to think this isn’t so bad, as it does allow Trump to go forward with his appeal. But there were major issues overlooked, as Mark Levin pointed out in his monologue Sunday night, such as who has jurisdiction in cases like this, the federal government or the state?
https://www.foxnews.com/video/
The guest who followed, UC Berkeley law professor John Yoo, concurred with Levin’s keen disappointment in the Supreme Court, saying, “You have a state here, attacking someone who’s the President-elect...The Supremacy Clause is supposed to stop states from interfering with the valid operations of the federal government. It’s almost as if Lincoln, after he was elected, tried to get to Washington DC, and Maryland decided to arrest him on his way to the Capitol.”
“...You’ve [also] got a state trying to take over the federal government’s authority to enforce the election laws,” he said. At the federal level, the DOJ and Federal Election Commission both looked at this case and decided not to prosecute. (Our thought: So, why didn’t the Biden DOJ tell Bragg, “Hey, this is our beat! Your state shouldn’t be hijacking it!” Instead, it was more of a collaboration, as a member of Biden’s DOJ actually took what in effect was a career demotion to infiltrate the state-level prosecution of Trump in New York.)
Yoo, who clerked for Justice Thomas, also wondered how future Presidents might think about their time in office, “knowing that there might be a Juan Merchan out there, an Alvin Bragg out there, going to twist state laws, try to attack them both before they’re in office and then, as they’ve been saying openly, once Donald Trump leaves office…”
Yoo pointed to the Court’s inconsistency, as they previously said the President had immunity for acts he takes as part of his official duties, even criticizing at length the prosecution’s use of information pertaining to these acts --- “privileged” information --- in their case against him. But then, months later, they let the sentencing go forward anyway.
Yoo’s concerned that the left has no plans to give up on lawfare; he sees this in Merchan’s behavior at the end of his case and also Jack Smith’s insistence on releasing a final report, even though his cases were dismissed. “What’s gonna stop, every four years, some DA, some state attorney general, from launching similar investigations of all the major Republican political candidates?” They’ve “crossed the constitutional Rubicon” and have seen the Supreme Court isn’t likely to intervene.
In a related point, Yoo suggested that the new DOJ, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, launch a civil rights investigation “into what’s going on in New York State, and...New York City,” referring to the prosecution of heroes such as Daniel Penny while “giving a pass to hundreds if not thousands of violent felons.” They might even consider cutting off funds, if that’s what it takes to fix the problem.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/
Four treasured originalists on the Court --- Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch --- see the need to take a look at the case because it’s an infringement on federal jurisdiction. (Heck, the whole case was taken on to interfere with a federal election.) The other justices seem to be missing this.
A video clip from back in May featuring Kash Patel --- now Trump’s nominee for FBI director --- has gone newly viral, as he’s discussing the highly conflicted Judge Merchan and his politically-connected daughter. In this brief clip with FOX NEWS’ Trace Gallagher, which also happens to include Trump’s AG nominee Pam Bondi, Patel calls for subpoenas to be issued to Merchan’s daughter and others at her company, “who made $15+ million from the illicit information pouring out of her father’s courtroom” during Trump’s trial. He wants to see bank records, “because money doesn’t lie.” No, it’s about the only thing that doesn’t lie in DC. We can’t wait to see some truth.
Moving on to “Special Counsel” Jack Smith, of course you know he’s been planning to resign and return to the International Criminal Court --- “The Hague” --- in The Netherlands. And, yes, according to a footnote in a filing by Judge Aileen Cannon Saturday, he did resign on Friday, after concluding his investigations of Trump and turning in Volumes 1 and 2 of his “final report” to the DOJ on Tuesday.
Aside: Speaking of The Hague, did you know that’s the same rogue international criminal court that indicted and issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes? Any ICC-member country --- which we are NOT, of course --- is obligated to pick up Netanyahu if he travels there and jail him, pending trial. Not kidding --- this could happen to Netanyahu if he travels to Britain or France.
According to Ben Shapiro, this court (ridiculously) claims jurisdiction even over countries that are not signatories. Jack Smith surely fits right in at the ICC.
More discussion, with Mark Levin, here. (It might seem as though we’re oversampling Levin today, but it all fits our discussion to a “T.”)
https://www.foxnews.com/video/
So, the public release of Volume 1 of the report, the one about the Mar-A-Lago “classified documents” case, has been delayed indefinitely by the DOJ, as Trump’s co-defendants are still in litigation. Judge Cannon had already put a three-day delay on releasing either volume, so Sunday would have been the first permissible day to see Smith’s J6 volume. But as of this writing early Monday, the J6 volume has not been released.
When it is, keep in mind that Smith can and will say ANYTHING HE WANTS in this report, and he’ll leave out anything he wants, too. The idea is to be as unflattering as possible to President Trump. And since such attempts in the past have still not deprived Trump of a second term in the White House, this one might be the nastiest yet.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/
As investigative reporter Julie Kelly writes, Trump’s attorneys learned of Smith’s final report only through stories in the media. When they were finally allowed to read the document, they immediately sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland outlining their objections to its release.
There now appear to be some complications even with releasing the “J6” volume, as it also makes reference to the “classified documents” case. As Kelly says, oops. Our guess is that this is why the “J6” volume didn’t come out on Sunday.
Antisemitism and Israel's Future | Huckabee Today
January 12, 2025
"Huckabee" Final Show Open
January 12, 2025
When Paradise Is Lost
January 10, 2025
Kenneth Allard
Was it only last week that we arose early, sipped our coffee and watched the Tournament of Roses Parade from sunny, beautiful Pasadena? Didn’t the nation just celebrate that annual event in a magical place typically marked by azure skies and spectacular roses? How did it happen so soon thereafter that every American household was horrified to watch those lush, gentle boulevards being improbably transformed into a fiery, latter-day version of Pompei?
Having been caught amidst Hurricane Katrina, where the gusts screamed at over a hundred miles an hour, I could scarcely imagine how such winds could bring fire rather than rain. Through tears, I prayed for the Angelinos, the heroism of our first responders and where oh where was the National Guard with its Black Hawks and Chinooks? I remembered being with LTG Russ Honore during Katrina, when he told everyone with ears that the course of wars or natural disasters were primarily determined by logistics, “because if logistics were easy, we’d just call ‘em tactics!”
It was a line good enough to steal, which I did repeatedly throughout my remaining years as an NBC military analyst. But what were the networks now saying about the logistics of fire suppression? While helicopters cannot fly during hurricanes, why had the water hoses and fire hydrants run dry in Pasadena – right down to water’s edge? Where were the tankers and bunker companies? And please, dear Lord, tell me what had become of the fire trucks and their well-organized squads? Without them, one home after another simply exploded in those ongoing, wind-driven fire storms? C’mon guys, get into the fight!
It was easy to remember the smells and the fear marking every face shown on TV. As a young officer, my first home was built along a canyon foot-hill in Sierra Vista, Arizona. An index contour line of 5200 feet ran through my back yard, which had a closeup view of the adjacent Huachuca Mountains, rising dramatically to over ten thousand feet. One Saturday morning, as I left to assume my position as staff duty officer at Fort Huachuca, I casually noted a small smoke trail spiraling the upper slopes of the mountain closest to me. Maybe that was something to check on later in the day because wasn’t the SDO supposed to be the eyes and ears of the command?
Upon arrival, I barely had time to drink a cup of coffee before the phones started to ring, a lot of civilians each of whom thought himself to be in charge. It seemed that an unattended campsite up on the mountain had done what unattended campsites tend to do – “and now, Captain, we have a fire on our hands!” I pointed out that the Huachuca Montains were not located on Federal property but soon an assortment of sheriffs, fire departments and even the Arizona Highway Patrol seemed to think I was heading the Army ‘s response! Fortunately, I took good notes on who wanted what so that my chain of command was kept informed. Later that afternoon, I finally had time to go outside and see how my mountain was doing: I could see my house through binoculars but now it appeared to have a spectacular up-close view of a volcano!
I returned there early the next morning when my duty was over, watching anxiously. The fire-line seemed headed in my direction but the winds kept shifting. Pondering this uncertain future from my fence-line, I hardly noticed a mountain lion passing nearby; he barely spared me a glance, clearly unimpressed by my shovel. Eventually the fire consumed 24,000 acres before those uncertain winds shifted the fire back on itself - and thankfully spared my house.
It took years before I realized that such “coincidences” may contain deeper meanings. Shortly after my wife Betsy and I were married, two of her dearest friends – Pastor Joe Glenn and his wife Pat – paid us a visit, probably to see for themselves if I was worthy of her hand. Fortunately, we hit it off and stayed in touch as the Glenns took over a small church in the northern California town of Paradise. If that name sounds familiar, it may be because both their church and home were destroyed by a 2018 wildfire just like Pasadena. Describing their narrow escape, Joe’s summation is something I have always treasured. “God is good. Paradise is lost but we are OK…Keep us in your prayers!” https://christianchronicle.org/paradise-is-lost-but-minister-and-wife-escaped-deadly-wildfire-with-the-clothes-on-our-back/
Great advice, Joe! But Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass, fair warning: You folks have some serious ‘splainin’ to do!
COL (Ret.) Ken Allard is a former West Point faculty member, Dean of the National War College and NBC News military analyst.
Historic destruction in Los Angeles
January 9, 2025
The catastrophic wildfires are continuing to cause historic destruction in Los Angeles and surrounding areas. So far, more than 27,000 acres and over a thousand homes and businesses have burned, and at least five people are known dead. Please pray for the residents and firefighters, and for a break in the high Santa Ana winds that are swiftly spreading the uncontained fire.
This is such a fast-moving story that we can’t possibly give you an up-to-the-minute report here. But it’s being covered 24/7 by all the electronic media outlets, and you can find the latest live updates at these links from Fox and Breitbart News:
We can, however, fill you in one some of the stories so far. One aspect of the fire is that many very expensive homes, including those of celebrities such as James Woods and Billy Crystal, have been destroyed. It was heartbreaking to hear Woods talk about losing his home and his beloved neighborhood.
Yesterday, we urged readers not to feel any satisfaction over harm coming to liberal Hollywood celebrities because some things transcend politics and are just basic human decency. We were actually reluctant to say that because we assume that our readers are good people with solid moral values who already know such things.
But sadly, we were reminded that there are people who would actually wish for a person to lose his home just because they don’t like his tweets. Such a person must have a moral code that was fished out of a sewer, and one of them was once in charge of molding young minds at the University of Missouri. Thank God, she’s not anymore.
It’s been observed that the billions of dollars in devastation to Los Angeles is like something that an America-hating terrorist would be proud to have caused. Yet many people are finally waking up to the fact that it’s the inevitable culmination of years of misguided and incompetent “progressive” Democrat “leadership.” Indeed, of all the ingredients it took to result in this catastrophe, the only one that wasn’t caused by them was the wind, not that they haven't generated plenty of that, too. For instance...
How do such fires start? We don’t know for sure about these, but it can’t help that they let weeds grow high in fields where they let homeless drug addicts live and start campfires.
Why is there so much kindling to spread the fires? Because they put unqualified eco-radicals in charge of overseeing state resources, and they refuse to allow the clearing of brush and fallen limbs, or the building of roads in the woods to allow firetrucks in.
Why is there no water to fight the fires (one Republican said the perfect illustration of California’s incompetent government was when brave firefighters aimed their hoses at burning homes and no water came out of the hydrants)? Just eight months ago, there were heavy rains and unusually high snowpack that melted off. Where did all that water go? It flowed into the ocean because geniuses like Gov. Gavin Newsom were placating the green radicals by destroying dams and reservoirs to save some fish.
Here's a video of Newsom patting himself on the back for launching the biggest dam removal project ever with the cooperation of the tribal nations, allowing his kids and grandkids to see something “that’s been here since time immemorial.”
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1877042693311738309
Do you know what California had since time immemorial, until the eeeevil white man came in and started building dams? It had overgrown wilderness where a lightning strike could start a fire that might burn across the entire state before it finally ran out of fuel or a rainstorm stopped it. The greens want to return the state to the pristine days before it was befouled by humans and their infernal meddling with Mother Nature by putting out those fires. And so they have.
(President Trump also weighed in on Newsom’s prioritizing of fish over people):
Why are the fire departments complaining that they don’t have enough staff and equipment? Maybe because Mayor Karen Bass cut the LAFD budget by $17 million as California cities donated millions of dollars’ worth of firefighting equipment to Ukraine. She also boasted of hiring a lesbian fire chief who announced that her focus would be “diversity, equity and inclusion” and recruiting more women, gays and minorities, not on superfluous things like making sure they have enough firefighters, equipment and water.
There’s more: People were asked to leave their homes unlocked so that firefighters could get inside. What happened? Predictably, they were looted, because local authorities tolerate crime. There was also heavy gridlock of traffic when people tried to evacuate, and not enough cops to direct the traffic (remember “defund the police?” Another brilliant leftist idea.) And what about Newsom and his ilk mandating that everyone drive electric cars? At least that hasn't happened yet. Imagine that huge traffic jam with people fleeing a fast-moving fire and all their highly flammable lithium batteries going dead.
The stupidity gets worse. Many of the people who’ve lost their homes don’t even have fire insurance. Why not? Because so many insurance companies stopped doing business in California. Insurance was already unaffordable because of the inflated property values due to all the regulations making it nearly impossible to build more affordable housing. And when insurers tried to raise rates after previous fires to stay in business, the state government blocked it (price controls are SUCH a good idea.) Oddly enough, when you mandate that businesses lose money, they tend to go away.
Two years ago, Los Angeles voters had the chance to elect as mayor wealthy businessman Rick Caruso, who promised to actually clean up the many problems that had plagued the city with crime, violence and filth. Instead, they elected Karen Bass, a career far-left politician, who when her city was burning down with inadequate fire protection and no water, was in Africa attending the inauguration of the President of Ghana.
Upon her return, a reporter for Australia’s Sky News asked Bass, “Do you owe citizens an apology for being absent whilst their homes were burning? Do you regret cutting the fire department's budget?” She had no answer and just stood there in silence for 45 seconds before fleeing.
Incidentally, you might recall that Bass was high on Joe Biden’s short list of black, female potential running mates in 2020. Yes, she was actually deemed less competent than Kamala Harris.
We list all these things not because we seek to point fingers of blame during a crisis, or “pounce,” as the media always call it when Republicans point out the Democrat incompetence and criminality that they refuse to cover. In fact, we’ve been writing about these issues for YEARS, and sounding the alarm that they were creating a disaster that was waiting to happen. Now it’s happening.
Is it possible that this might finally convince even Hollywood’s leftist liberal celebrities to vote these incompetent morons out of office? Some are actually saying things that suggest the blinders have at last been burned off of their eyes.
As for California’s leftist politicians, they’re reacting as expected: by denying responsibility and blaming Trump and climate change and other bogeymen. Newsom shifted the blame to “the local folks.”
We suspect that their biggest concern will be rebuilding the polls by November of next year so they can all get reelected. Let's hope their dream burns down, too.
Biden awards Presidential Medal of Freedom to Hillary Clinton
January 6, 2025
Mike Huckabee
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any lower than for allegedly-still-President Joe Biden to give Liz Cheney the Presidential Citizens Medal, the staffers who make his decisions shouted, “Hold muh Chardonnay” and found a way to dig the cesspit even deeper. Saturday, Biden awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, formerly the nation’s highest civilian honor, to Russiagate hoax mastermind Hillary Clinton, Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards and – you might want to sit down for this one – socialist billionaire George Soros.
Soros was described by the White House as a “philanthropist” who has “focused on global initiatives that strengthen democracy, human rights, education, and social justice.” He’s also a huge funder of the Democrat Party, anti-American and anti-Israel radicals, and far-left initiatives like electing DAs who refuse to jail criminals but prosecute people who defend themselves from them.
This medal is supposed to go to “individuals who have made exemplary contributions to the prosperity, values, or security of the United States,” but judging from the way Hillary was responsible for the Benghazi massacre and turning Libya into a bloody hellscape; Soros has bankrolled an epidemic of rape, robbery and murder in America’s blue cities; and Planned Parenthood – well, you know what they do for profit – maybe it’s now based on who’s racked up the highest body count. We hope they didn’t give them real Presidential Medals of Freedom, but bitter chocolate ones covered in foil. Otherwise, we can now consider this Medal to be as tarnished and debased as everything else this blighted Administration has touched.
To be honest, our first thought on hearing that Soros was getting that honor was disbelief, followed by asking, “What, were Stalin, Ernst Blofeld and Satan not available?” It’s good to see that VP-elect J.D. Vance had a very similar reaction.
https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/01/05/jd-vance-pol-pot-bidens-medals-n2406145
Rabbi Michael Barclay also has some excellent comments on how the awards are yet another attack on religion by Biden, who claims to be a devout Catholic but has run the most radically pro-abortion Administration in history. As for Soros, he notes that Farley Weiss, the former President of the National Council of Young Israel, wrote, “No one has financed more destructive attacks on Israel and the American Jewish community than Soros.”
JANUARY 6 SPECIAL EDITION --- election certification today
January 6, 2025
Mike Huckabee
By the time you read this on Monday, January 6, 2025, the certification of President Donald Trump’s second-term win is just about to take place, if it hasn’t already happened. This date, of course, also marks the fourth anniversary of the unfortunate events of January 6, 2021. There’s plenty to say about both.
The day couldn’t be marked without a commentary from investigative reporter Julie Kelly, who remarks that this is “a plot twist that even the most creative --- or diabolical --- fiction writer would never have imagined.”
For one thing, the still-Vice President Kamala Harris will be presiding. You have to love that.
As Kelly points out, Kamala herself likened January 6 to December 7, 1941, and September 11, 2001, saying these events “remind all who have lived through them where they were...when our democracy came under assault.”
(Speaking of that, Kamala has still had nothing to say about where SHE was on January 6 four years ago, as it was NOT at the Capitol building, to be certified as the first black female elected Vice President, but rather at the DNC headquarters for reasons she’s never made clear. See “pipe bomb story,” which we’ll get to.)
Kelly notes that the Democrat talking points about January 6 went out before the first protester even entered the Capitol building. “As the chaos was still unfolding at the Capitol, Joe Biden gave a nationwide address --- he allegedly had planned to talk about the economy at 4 PM, but in yet another fortuitous coincidence for Democrats, Biden quickly pivoted to a lengthy rant about the protest, to denounce the ‘insurrection.’”
Since that day, we’ve been subjected to a nonstop tape-loop of J6 rhetoric. Trump was impeached --- again. Anyone who was even in the vicinity that day was forever inked to “domestic terrorism” by the FBI. The DOJ ended up arresting roughly 1,600 individuals, most of whom had nothing to do with any disturbance. And they’re still arresting people!
Then there was the January 6 “Select” Committee. (We always put “Select” in quotation marks because Nancy Pelosi personally and in violation of the rules selected the two so-called Republicans on it, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, both of whom thankfully destroyed their own political careers with their disgusting behavior.) Not only did this committee exist to tell Americans “what to think” about J6 (chairman Bennie Thompson’s words), but it also hid exculpatory evidence and destroyed massive records that were supposed to be turned over to the new Congress. Shameful.
As Kelly writes, “The exhaustive operation --- the multifaceted lawfare, the Congressional theater, the media fixation --- was supposed to end up with Trump sitting in jail, a final death blow to his political future and the populist movement he created.” But that was not to be.
Part of the reason was the failure on all fronts of the Biden administration, of course. But the other part was their stunningly heavy-handed approach to “getting Trump,” as well as his supporters, associates and allies. It was the DEMOCRATS who rightly came to be seen as the real threat to democracy, not us.
As Kelly observes, “Instead of representing one of the darkest days in history, January 6 to millions of Americans instead embodies the corrupt, bloodthirsty and vengeful nature of the existing government and its media bootlickers, which foreshadowed the sort of banana republic-style rule see in Marxist hellholes, not in the United States.”
So now we’re counting on President Trump to do what is necessary to reform the unelected government bureaucracies that played a role in this. It’s they who apparently have been running things --- easy with a senile puppet in the Oval Office --- but that has to end NOW.
We’re hoping for some accountability as well. Special Counsel Jack Smith and prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s office in DC (Matthew Graves, who oversaw the January 6 prosecutions) are reportedly lawyering up, with Smith planning to exit the country and go back to the war crimes court at The Hague. Liz Cheney is being investigated by a congressional committee and might face scrutiny by Trump’s DOJ. As we reported last week, Bennie Thompson has even said he’d accept a pre-emptive pardon from President Biden if Biden offers it. (What do you bet Biden does, along with pardons for everyone who might conceivably need one? A president who can award “billionaire philanthropist” and real-life Bond villain George Soros the Presidential Medal of Freedom on his way out the door is capable of ANYTHING.)
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who’s on video admitting responsibility for security failures on January 6, went on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday to lament the “denial of what happened January 6.” If anyone is in denial, or who just doesn’t understand what happened and its importance to history, it’s her.
https://www.declassified.live/
RELATED: Speaking of dismantling the unelected bureaucracy, recall that last week we commented on the cutoff of funding (finally!) for the Global Engagement Center, the division of the U.S. State Department dedicated to censoring so-called “disinformation” from news/opinion sites like OURS. Trump’s new administration is going to have to rededicate itself to this, as the GEC has already rebranded itself and is now the “Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Hub.” The GEC’s budget was simply “realigned.”
These people are DRIVEN to stifle dissent, and stopping them will require a stake through the heart.
To commemorate January 6, THE GATEWAY PUNDIT re-posted a piece that originally ran about a month ago, about the mistreatment in prison of Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, currently serving a 22-YEAR SENTENCE for his “role” in the riot. (He was one of four Proud Boys convicted of “seditious conspiracy;” Biden’s DOJ had asked for 33 years.)
Tarrio was not even in Washington DC that day.
As Cara Castronuova reports, Tarrio is --- after being moved to 11 different prisons in just 16 weeks --- currently in a rural Mississippi prison where at least there is a lot of Trump support among both inmates and staff, as opposed to “the gulag” in leftist DC. (By the way, in case you’ve heard that the Proud Boys are some sort of white supremacist group, Tarrio is Afro-Cuban.) His treatment as described in this article is shockingly inhumane.
The theory is that his isolation and frequent moves, dubbed “diesel therapy,” were done to “keep Tarrio’s mouth shut” in the months leading up to the 2024 election. When a mainstream media outlet inquired about doing an interview, Tarrio was advised by prison officials not to do it, and that was reportedly when his “road trips” from prison to prison to prison started. He was reportedly transported, in all, over 3,200 miles, wearing shackles, chains and handcuffs the whole way. One trip might last as long as 18 hours. And whenever he arrived at a new prison, he was put into solitary for two weeks, with no time outside at all.
As Castronuova writes, what Tarrio went through “can only be described as the greatest form of torture that one must endure within the U.S. [Bureau of Prisons] system.” The physical changes wrought by his treatment are likened here to those of Tom Hanks’ character in CASTAWAY. His beard grew long; he had no showers or decent food for weeks at a time and, in some locations, not even a toothbrush. Tarrio lost over 40 pounds.
The news of Trump’s win on November 5 was Tarrio’s only hope of a future. He prayed for Trump to win, and now he’s praying for a presidential pardon, which surely, he will get. He just wants to return home to Miami and go kayaking in the Florida Keys.
You’ll want to read the full account of what he’s gone through, complete with a map of his “diesel transport.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.
Today, Congress ushers in a new Trump era. Yes, there will be protests, but at least most congressional Democrats have settled down and are resigned, at least for this moment. Still, anti-Trump protesters have convened at the Lincoln Memorial to demand he be blocked from becoming the 47th President because he’s a (sigh) “insurrectionist.” Good grief. There are your “enemies of democracy.”
Most people are sick of this and want solutions to problems. As Sarah Arnold at TOWNHALL says, “While the left continues to push its narrative of division and ‘insurrection,’ Trump remains focused on uniting the country, restoring prosperity, and taking on the corrupt political elites who have long been out of touch with the American people.”
(SIDE NOTE: While Democrat politicians are largely going with the flow today, expect that spirit of cooperation to evaporate with Trump’s inauguration. Look who Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has appointed to the Senate Judiciary Committee. This choice is so awful, we’re wondering if the GOP might even bring a vote to disqualify Shifty, considering he was previously censured for lying to the American people.)
https://slaynews.com/news/
As we pass the fourth anniversary of the J6 riot, it’s also a good time to note that information is still coming out about the pipe bombs supposedly placed to go off that day. BLAZE MEDIA has an excellent write-up on the interim joint report just issued by the House Judiciary Committee and the Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight (the one chaired by Rep. Barry Loudermilk of Georgia). As you know, just as the House report outlining the many security failures was being released, the FBI happened to release an update of its own, the most significant part of which seems to be that, after four years, they can say the pipe bomber was 5-foot-7.
For when you have time, this is a must-read.
RELATED: Even as Trump is certified as the President-elect, some on the left are still doing what they can to put black marks by his name. Judge Juan Merchan knows he can’t put President Trump in jail, much as he wants to, for those 34 counts of “falsifying business records” (for perfectly legal NDA payments to Stormy Daniels being labeled “legal expenses”), but he’s going through the motions of a sentencing hearing anyway, just so Trump can technically be referred to as a convicted felon.
As you know, this case is filled with reversible error, and on the bright side, once this step is taken, Trump can file his appeal. But in the meantime, the left gets to call Trump a convicted felon, which they will richly enjoy even though it means nothing to the people who support him and know he was railroaded. Jonathan Turley explains the nature of the left’s “consolation prize.”
Here’s more from the Victory Girls blog. Of course, Merchan timed this for ten days before Trump’s inauguration…
https://victorygirlsblog.com/
SEMI-RELATED: Since some political adversaries are as unhinged as ever, and Trump still has the “old” Secret Service, many of his supporters have expressed concern about his plan to have a victory rally in DC the day before his inauguration. At least it’s indoors, at Capitol One Arena, rather than in the open air, but still...perhaps he could rethink that? It might be better --- safer --- to keep the transition of power low-key. The inauguration the following day is worrisome enough.
Come to think of it, with so much at stake, couldn’t President Trump just be sworn in INSIDE the White House, with lots of big-screen coverage outside? We’d happily go for that.
Bizarre: Cheney and Thompson, J6 Committee co-chairs, awarded medals by President Biden
January 3, 2025
Mike Huckabee
In a particularly in-your-face story, the White House announced on Thursday that President Biden would be awarding Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson and Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, co-chairs of the House “Select” Committee on January 6, the Presidential Citizens Medal, the second highest award that’s given to civilians. And that’s what he did, in a White House ceremony that very day.
Cheney and Thompson were among a group of 20 whom Biden said had “performed exemplary deeds of service” (right, for him!) and are bonded by “their common decency and commitment to serving others.”
“The country is better because of their dedication and sacrifice.”
In reference to Cheney, Biden said, “Throughout two decades in public service, including as a Congresswoman from Wyoming and Vice Chair of the Committee on the January 6 attack, she has raised her voice --- and reached across the aisle --- to defend our Nation and the ideals we stand for: Freedom. Dignity. And decency. Her integrity and intrepidness remind us all what is possible if we work together.”
(We’ll pause while you fall to the floor and roll around laughing helplessly. Biden uses the word “decency” a lot, but we do not think he knows what it means.)
Of course, Cheney didn’t just reach across the aisle; she sailed all the way across, and that’s what she was being rewarded for. President Trump has made much more fitting comments about Cheney --- for example, when he said last month on “Meet the Press” that she and Thompson deserve to go to jail for their work on that committee but that he would not direct his AG or FBI director to go after them. By all appearances, they tampered with at least one witness (fabulist Cassidy Hutchinson), suppressed exculpatory evidence, and deliberately destroyed records that they were required to turn over to congressional Republicans. The J6 Committee was a sham, and they were the ones in charge.
Fortunately, the fed-up voters of Wyoming had the final say about Cheney, who couldn’t even win her primary this time around, losing in a landslide to challenger Harriet Hageman. So Liz can take her award and stuff it...well, into a drawer back home, mercifully far from Washington, DC.
Yet the DC crowd reveres her for throwing the rules out the window to go after Trump and paint him as an “insurrectionist.” Oh, yes, she’s in very good standing with them. In fact, during Thursday’s awards ceremony in the East Room, they gave her a standing ovation. If you just can’t bring yourself to believe that something this preposterous actually happened, here’s the video; fast-forward to 9:30.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The uproarious applause and standing O for Cheney were sparked when the announcer said she was being honored for “putting the American people over party.” Sorry, should have warned you to have your barf bags handy. This recognition of Cheney and Thompson marks the least deserved awards since President Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize for being born.
Soon after this spectacle, Thompson was also singled out for his own standing O, after being acknowledged for “his lifelong dedication to safeguarding the Constitution.” Again, not kidding. He’s the one who, before his committee’s public hearings, said he’d be holding them because “the public needs to know what to think.”
When asked by CNN last month if he would accept a pre-emptive pardon from President Biden, Thompson said, “It’s his prerogative. If he offers it to me or other members of the committee…I would accept it, but it’s his choice.”
Heck, Biden has commuted the death sentences of vicious murderers, so why not this? According to sources for NBC NEWS, Biden and his senior aides have discussed issuing pre-emptive pardons “for those who could become targets of Trump in his next administration.” See, Biden HAS to pardon them! It’s Trump’s fault, for daring to seek retribution! Or as many other Americans would call it, “justice.”
Brit Hume has it right, in a post on X: “This is repulsive. That investigation was done by a committee all of whose members were chosen by Nancy Pelosi, and was produced like a TV show. There was no cross examination of witnesses. The media fell for it, but it was utterly one-sided. A show trial.”
By the way, as Guy Benson posted on X, Bennie Thompson refused to certify George W. Bush’s win in 2004. Isn’t that an act of insurrection?
Recall that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in violation of the rules establishing the committee, personally chose the two Republicans on it, Cheney and then-Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, whose work on the committee was so unpopular that he retired ahead of the 2022 election.
Tyler Durden at LIBERTY DAILY offers a good refresher on the allegations of witness tampering against Cheney, as reported by Georgia Rep. Barry Loudermilk, chairman of the House subcommittee looking into the J6 Committee. Loudermilk says he’s concluded that “numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney” and called for an investigation by the FBI.
As Durden notes, if Trump’s DOJ pursues Cheney, she’ll undoubtedly invoke immunity under the Speech and Debate Clause of the Constitution, which protects lawmakers from criminal liability related to their legislative duties. We shall see how that goes. It’s probable that she won’t need to, though, as Biden’s likely going to preemptively pardon her, anyway. He might as well, having already debased the pardon power just as he’s debased the honor of receiving this medal.
https://thelibertydaily.com/
Of Cheney’s selection for the award, Miranda Devine of the NEW YORK POST said on X, “She should have had enough self-respect to refuse it.” Well, she doesn’t, though she did look kind of uncomfortable up there.
https://x.com/mirandadevine/
As reported at REDSTATE, the J6 Committee has been accused by congressional colleagues of failing to preserve a massive number of documents --- 1.5 to 2 terabytes’ worth of information --- and deleting over 100 encrypted files, despite then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy demanding they preserve all records. Fortunately, they were later recovered by a forensics team.
President Biden politicized last year’s awards, too, holding them on January 6 and giving awards to several Capitol Police officers, including a posthumous award for Officer Brian Sicknick, whom the administration falsely maintained had died as a result of injuries that day. Biden actually said that Sicknick, along with officer William Evans, were killed by insurrectionists. (As you know, Sicknick died of a stroke, after the riot, and his death was ruled by natural causes. Evans was killed months later by a follower of the Nation of Islam.)
Well, that’s about all we can stomach about Liz Cheney for one day. But in case you missed it in Thursday’s newsletter, here’s a very intriguing prediction she made in December 2020, before Trump’s January 6 rally and the vote certification: that the joint session of Congress that day was likely to be disrupted by a bomb threat and possible evacuation.
Sure enough, on January 6, two pipe bombs were “discovered” very close to the Capitol. So, where did Liz get her crystal ball? What did she know back then that we didn’t know? For when you have time, if you didn’t see it, there’s much more detail here...
https://www.declassified.live/
Speaking of the J6 pipe bombs, the committee headed by Barry Loudermilk and Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie has released its report on the events of January 6 and the work of the J6 “Select” Committee, and it’s quite damning about the search for the so-called pipe bomber.
As Julie Kelly reports, “...the failure to locate the J6 pipe bomber doesn’t add up considering the extensive investigative tools still being used by the FBI to track down and arrest j6 protesters, a caseload now approaching 1,600 individuals.” If they can find all those people, why can’t they find this person? Sure seems as though they don’t want to find him. With so many questions remaining, Kelly’s report is a must-read…
https://www.declassified.live/
According to THE GATEWAY PUNDIT, the FBI has stopped cooperating with congressional investigators on the pipe bomber case. For when you have time, theirs is an excellent write-up…
Finally, as David Spunt reported Thursday night on FOX NEWS “Special Report” --- in a segment tellingly called “Whatever happened to…?” --- the FBI has just released “new footage” (huh?) of the hooded pipe bomber suspect. He’s shown at “approximately 7:54 PM” on January 5, 2021, sitting on the bench outside the DNC headquarters, the location where one of two pipe bombs was “discovered” on January 6, just about the time the vote certification was scheduled to start.
Spunt said that “agents know now the person’s height --- 5-foot-7.” Are they telling us it’s taken four years to figure out his HEIGHT??
The FBI says it’s assessed over 600 tips, reviewed about 39,000 video files and conducted over 1,000 interviews during the past four years. They’ve even produced an illustration of the suspect’s Nike shoe, the Air Max Speed Turf. This seems to be all they’ve got on the mystery guy after FOUR YEARS. But, hey, the $500,000 reward still stands (and will continue to).
The fact that the FBI is releasing new video now is just bizarre. Did they time this to distract from Loudermilk’s J6 report? Here’s the FOX story, but we can’t wait to see what Julie Kelly has to say about it.
RADICAL Freedom: Addiction to Redemption | Huckabee Today
January 3, 2025
Mike Huckabee
Speaking of things that Democrats have allowed to happen, in Queens, New York, on New Years’ Eve, ten people were injured by men who sprayed bullets into a crowd outside a nightclub. But the NYPD said it was not a terrorist attack. We assume it was just a typical night in Alvin Bragg's New York.
During our break, New York was also the site of another horrific attack when a man on a subway killed a woman by setting her on fire. He turned out to be a Guatemalan illegal alien who was deported under Trump, came back under Biden, was released into the interior of the US, and was living in a “migrant shelter” at taxpayer expense.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/woman-burned-death-horrific-subway-attack-identified-police
What do all of these horrifying and tragic attacks have in common, whether they are by violent criminals, illegal aliens, foreign terrorists or American citizens radicalized by America’s enemies? They all happened because the people who are entrusted with keeping America safe failed to do their jobs. They let the wrong people in, they let the wrong people out, and they targeted the wrong people for surveillance while ignoring the obvious threats.
A perfect example: Just hours after the New Orleans terrorist attack, pro-Palestinian protesters blocked Sixth Avenue in Manhattan, chanting for “intifada” – i.e., they’re pro-terrorism. But obviously, these people aren’t a threat. The real terrorist threat comes from concerned parents, traditional Catholics, pro-life activists, Trump voters and anyone who came within 300 yards of the Capitol on January 6th, 2021.
Here’s how bad our federal agencies have gotten at their jobs: The New York Post arrived at the New Orleans terrorist’s home before the FBI did:
https://instapundit.com/693743/
Let’s hope this insanity and incompetence come to a screeching halt on January 20th, and let’s all pray that there are no more deaths or injuries due to America’s enemies taking advantage of the remaining days of our vacuum of leadership.
COMMANDMENTS Debate: Faith & Education | Huckabee Today
January 2, 2025
Mike Huckabee
NOW PLAYING: THIS Is A Night at the Movies You CAN'T MISS! | FULL EPISODE | Huckabee's Jukebox
January 2, 2025
Mike Huckabee
We hope you had a fun, safe and happy Christmas or Hanukkah vacation and avoided drunk drivers and hangovers on New Year’s Eve.
We’ll hit the new year running tomorrow when we recap the major stories of the past week and dive back into covering the daily news (and don't worry: despite some changes afoot, the Huckabee Newsletter will continue as always, bringing you the latest reliable news and common sense commentary with a humorous twist.) But on this final holiday of the season, we wanted to offer you a special New Year's message in between all the parades and football games.
It’s become standard rhetoric to call each New Year a time for hope and new beginnings, but in this case, that’s never seemed so true for so many people. There’s a palpable feeling of optimism in the air that America’s, and the world’s, long nightmare may finally be over. For the past few years, it seemed that leftism, anti-Americanism and cultural divisions (and those who profit off them) were on an irreversible ascendance. Those in power were doing everything they could, constitutional or otherwise, to cement that power and crush any opposition.
But then, a funny thing happened. The people decided enough was enough. They refused to be cowed and silenced and shamed any longer. They stood up, fought back, and took their country back. The election results were a stunning rebuke to the arrogant elitists, who still can’t figure out how they could possibly have been rejected by voters. In their cast-iron bubbles, this is a terrible, frightening period of existential dread. To normal people, it’s a combination of a great New Year’s Eve party and Morning In America, part two.
A new Fox News poll found that 57% of Americans are hopeful about Trump’s presidency. When was the last time you heard of a majority of people feeling hopeful about anything? One cable news guest said even his Democrat friends told him that even though they didn't vote for Trump, they were secretly kind of glad he won.
In many ways, it’s really not 2025 yet. The true “new year” won’t arrive until January 20th, Inauguration Day. Until then, we’ll undoubtedly have to suffer through many more attempts to undermine Trump (and the will of the people), whether by Deep State bureaucrats, Joe Biden himself or his staffers who’ve actually been running the White House for the past four years. Who knows what horrors will be signed between now and the 20th with them moving Biden’s hand while he holds the pen? Fortunately, it appears that this time around, Trump is onto them and ready to counter their sabotage attempts.
But at least the end is finally in sight. Trump has a lot of work to do, and it won’t be easy. He has four years’ worth of massive destruction to fix, and he’ll have to do it while coping with Republican in-fighting in Congress (he may need you to periodically remind your legislators just whom they work for), Democrat obstructionism (they refuse to admit their failures, even when they’re as obvious as a mountain of garbage), and a renewed anti-Trump media onslaught.
You’d think the media would learn its lesson, having gotten virtually every major story since 2016 wrong and watching their approval and audience ratings collapse like an inflatable Santa when the air pump is unplugged. But egomaniacs never learn from mistakes they refuse to acknowledge. For instance, the Media Research Center found that before the election, 98% of late-night comics’ political jokes were at Trump’s expense. They failed miserably to harm him, and their ratings are swirling down the toilet. Do you think they’ll start being more even-handed now? That’s about as likely as Jimmy Kimmel saying something that’s actually funny.
But there are positive signs that the public’s message is finally starting to sink in, from some major liberal newspapers firing far-left editorial boards to corporations ending DEI programs to movie and TV studios axing plans for more woke bombs. You can only burn so much money before you start to feel the heat.
We are very hopeful that 2025 will be a historic year, the year that Americans of all races and backgrounds come together to take their country back and restore patriotism, national security, the Constitution, meritocracy, common sense and the rule of law. It will take time (to use a sports term, this is a “rebuilding year”), but it’s said that a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. But it also has to be a step in the right direction.
We hope and pray that 2025 will be the year when we finally take those first steps in the right direction, on the journey back to rebuilding the America we love.
Reversed: Biblical Answers to Today’s Toughest Issues | Jim Garlow on Huckabee Today
December 30, 2024
Never forget what it is like to be a kid at Christmas
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
“Christmas 1944: I am four years old and my dad is still overseas, so mom and I are staying with my grandparents. Christmas eve, it's time for me to hang up my sock. I'm just getting ready to hang it on the mantle when grandpa comes in. He has a giant sock and a big metal wash tub. I ask him what he is doing, and this is what he tells me:
‘I'm going to hang this big old sock up.’ He hangs his sock up then he puts the wash tub under the sock. He shows me that there is a hole in the toe of the sock, and it has a tennis ball in the hole. He then tells me that ‘when Santa comes tonight, he will start putting good stuff in his big old sock, and the tennis ball will fall out.’ Santa will keep stuffing his sock and the presents will fall into the wash tub, and he will get way more stuff than I will in my little old sock.
Well, I'm only four years old, but I know this ain't right. I go running to grandma and tell her that grandpa is going to cheat Santa. Grandma says, ‘Don't worry, because I know that Santa is much smarter than your grandpa is.’ So I go off to bed, but I am not happy.
Christmas morning comes. I run downstairs and see that my grandpa has a sour look on his face. I see my sock has all kinds of good stuff in it. I look at grandpa’s sock, and the wash tub is full. It has an old rubber boot with a big hole in it, a big half-rotten squash, some chunks of coal, an old broken shovel etc., etc. I guess grandma was right after all. Santa is smarter than grandpa.”
The next year, Melvin’s grandpa was still putting creativity into Christmas…
“Christmas 1945. I am five years old, and we are still staying with my grandparents…My father was in Japan in the Second World War, his two brothers were in the European theater. All three came home OK. I thank God for that and for all of the men that have gone before.
We are trimming the Christmas tree. Grandpa comes in, and he has all of these walnuts that he has painted silver and put a yarn loop on to hang them with. I think they’re neat, but that’s about it.
Christmas morning, I come down and start opening my presents. Grandpa says, ‘Why don't you open one of those walnuts?’ I say ‘Naw, I got to open my presents’… Well grandpa keeps after me. Finally, I say, ‘Okay!’ So I crack a walnut open, and a penny falls out. Well, NOW I'm opening walnuts! There's dimes, nickels, and pennies. When I get done, I have about a dollar fifty, and that’s big money in 1945.
…My grandfather thought enough of me to take the time to cut the walnuts open and take out the meat for grandma to cook with. Then he put a coin in and glued each one back together, just to make a little five-year-old boy happy on Christmas morning.
Sixty-five years later, I don't remember anything else I got that Christmas. But I remember the walnuts and the love that went into making them. That might be something for young parents to think about... It really is the little things that count the most.”
Thanks, Melvin, for giving us all something important to remember before we go frantically hunting for whatever the latest “hot” gift is. It’s not so much the gift that we remember years later, but the person who loved us enough to give it to us that matters.
Setting the Pattern For Christmas Traditions
December 23, 2024
Angie from Wyoming shared a wonderful story of how a small gesture can grow over time into a cherished family Christmas tradition:
“My mother began a Christmas tradition over 60 years ago when she was a young mother. At times, I think she wishes she would not have started it, but there is no stopping it.
Years ago, she found a pattern in what she believes was Better Homes and Gardens magazine for knitted Christmas stockings. She had three small children at the time and knitted each one a stocking which was personalized with their names knit into the pattern...the tradition began.
Not only has she hand-knitted Christmas stockings for several of her friends’ children as well as nieces and nephews, she has knitted stockings for all of her eight children and their spouses, 24 grandchildren and their spouses, and over 30 great-grandchildren. The Christmas stockings are such a big deal, I had to change the spelling of my oldest daughter’s name so it would fit within the parameters of the stocking pattern.
Each stocking takes weeks to complete and as the years have gone by, they are getting larger as her crippled hands knit more loosely than when she knitted her very first one. To date, the last stocking was finished days ago for my granddaughter…Someday as she grows older, hopefully she will cherish the hands and heart that created such a masterpiece.
I am grateful for my mother's selfless determination to carry on this tradition and know it hasn't been easy. I love her so much for that and am convinced I am going to have to learn to knit, not because my future grandchildren need matching stockings, but because I want her legacy of love to continue.”
PS - Angie sent me this story in 2011, so I assume she’s learned to knit by now!
Danella from Texas also has a wonderful family Christmas tradition that’s being handed down across generations:
“Growing up in Saskatchewan, Canada It was always a 'White Christmas'. Christmas morning was always cold in the house when I would get up to get my stocking, and looked to see what Santa had brought me. It was usually before Daddy had fired up the furnace to warm the house up. Our stockings were the only gift we were allowed to have before getting dressed and having breakfast.
Then everyone gathered around the Christmas tree while Daddy read the Christmas story from Luke chapter 2, and we children explained 'why we celebrated Christmas with gifts'. Every year, it was the same. After I grew up and had children of my own, we did the same; and now when my grandchildren come for Christmas, we wait to open gifts until the Christmas Story is read and we all know why we celebrate with gifts.
My parents knew how to make sure we children knew that Christ really was in Christmas.”
Recently, police officers have become targets of hatred, assaults and even deadly violence. Now is a perfect time to stop and reflect on the many ways in which police officers and other first responders such as firefighters and EMTs give up their holidays so that we can enjoy ours in safety. Many officers also go above and beyond the call of duty by performing incredible volunteer work. One of those was a listener of mine named Randy, a retired police sergeant from Wyoming. He shared a memory of a tradition of playing Santa Claus that should have come with hazardous duty pay.
Randy wrote:
"For many years, it was my distinct pleasure to assume the role of 'real Santa' at Christmas time. Though my sleigh was still a black and white sedan, my uniform changed from dark blues to a genuine Santa suit. I appeared on Christmas Eve, right at bedtime, delivering toys to needy children as well as my fellow officers…who had small children. What made this all work was the 'understanding' of the parents to make sure the kids were close to the front window upon my arrival, that they were not allowed out on the porch (where I left their gifts) until I was out of sight, and under NO circumstances were any pets to be loose.
All the parents were following Santa's instructions to the letter...until I got to my Chief's house. I gently placed (his sons') gifts on the porch (and) began to shake the bells, anticipating three squashed, tiny faces peering into the frosty night, trying to catch a glimpse of Santa. To my surprise...No faces. I shook the bells harder and added a hearty ‘HO, HO, HO!’ Still, no faces.
Now in mid-‘HO,’ I heard the front door open and a small dog barking. 'For cryin' out loud,' I muttered, as I jumped toward the driveway. If only I'd remembered the small wire fence surrounding his wife's flower bed. There was no time to pick myself up, as I heard high-pitched giggles floating on the cold night air. A quick double combat roll placed me out of innocent eyes' way, underneath my boss's pickup truck."
Then Randy heard a noise that seemed to be very close: "I smelled the dog food on his breath a scant millisecond before he yapped out the alarm. The 'WHOA!' that jumped from my lips was cut painfully short as I rammed my head into the pickup's driveline... The thought crossed my mind to reach out and pinch off his little windpipe, but that seemed a bit ugly for Christmas Eve."
A pair of cowboy boots suddenly replaced the dog: "I recognized my boss's voice as the words, 'Merry Christmas, heh, heh, heh," settled onto the cold concrete... 'Merry Christmas, Chief,' I replied as a solitary drop of black engine oil struck me dead center in the forehead. 'THANKS FOR NOT TURNING ON THE PORCH LIGHT!'
I continued on my rounds, a black greasy racing stripe running from my white curly beard to my belt, a well-lubricated lump on my forehead. I finished just as a soft snow began to fall, covering everything in a glistening blanket of white. It seemed the perfect punctuation mark to end another Christmas on Patrol."
Thanks again for that great story, Randy. And thanks to all the police officers and other first responders and military members who go above and beyond, and sometimes even roll underneath, to keep us all safe during the holidays and all year ‘round.
Christmas is about what we give, not what we get
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
This story reminds us that no matter how bad off we think we are, there are others in greater need. And nothing reflects the spirit of Christmas more than someone who gives to others even when they have very little themselves. Dorothy from North Carolina wrote:
“It's been a few years ago now that through an unusual set of circumstances I met a dear Christian lady named Hilda N-----. Hilda had endured many hardships in life…Now, in her later years… she lived in abject poverty with…crippling arthritis. It was Christmas and I had a gift for Hilda. Mark and I were dating at the time and I asked him to go with me to Hilda's humble home… But it wasn't my gift that I've remembered all these years...it was HER gift, given liberally out of her poverty, that I will never forget.
She and I had exchanged gifts, her gift to me a small ceramic bell with a cross at the top from the dollar store. And then came the moment I cherish yet today. She looked at Mark apologetically and reached down into the cushion of the chair…fumbling until she finally retrieved a small, zippered change purse. Her gnarled, misshapen fingers (terribly twisted from the arthritis) moving slowly and with painful effort, she managed to open the purse… Finally, she turned to Mark and, pulling out a folded, crumpled $1.00 bill, she held it out to him.
Her soft, quiet voice and loving manner gave eloquence to the gesture. ‘I didn't know YOU were coming so I didn't have a gift for you. Here’, she handed him the dollar bill, ‘Merry Christmas.’
Tears sprang to my eyes as I knew what a sacrifice was represented in the giving of the dollar bill. Her heart of love and her desire to share the little she had gave her gift more meaning than a purse full of gold.”
Thank you, Dorothy, and Hilda, for reminding us that Christmas isn’t about what we get, it’s about what we give.
Phillis from Arkansas experienced a tough Christmas that truly made her appreciate why it’s more blessed to give than to receive:
“In 1989, my youngest daughter was in the hospital with a ruptured appendix. She was there for 28 days, and the doctor did not expect her to live. I was student teaching, and we were living on my husband's teaching salary of under $20000, and we had two other children. To say the least, money was tight, but we were praising the Lord that He had performed a miracle and our little girl was alive.
I had already told the children that Christmas was going to be very little, because of this money situation. Our church got together and had a money tree for us. They said people gave who never had given to any money tree. They collected over $400 to give to us...
This really humbled us. We had always been the ones to give to money trees, and it was very hard to be given to. It brought to mind that ‘it is more blessed to give than receive.’ We thanked God and the people for all they did to make my kids’ Christmas, but also my prayer was that I never had to be in the position where I had to receive rather than give. God has answered that prayer, and we feel blessed to be able to continue to give to the Lord's work.
That is such a memorable Christmas, because it shows how God's people came together to help their brothers and sister in Christ when there was a need. It continues to touch my heart to remember how much Christ and his people love each other.”
Reed from Texas also recalled a childhood Christmas when someone went above and beyond to make sure the kids had Christmas gifts. Or maybe that was just the real Santa:
“Our Christmas in the 1950's started at around the 10th of December. My mom would send all of us boys, four in all, out to the fields when we lived in the Kentucky countryside to find that perfect Christmas tree. It would be about four-to-five-feet tall. Dragging it back we could feel the magicial season excitement already stirring in our hearts.
With so little at the house all year, the thought of new toys and candy were enough to set the minds of our young souls on fire for the next 15 days and even after Christmas day. That Christmas Eve, after opening our traditional presents to each other (simple gifts, of course), the front door flew open and in walked Santa Claus with his big bag of presents.
Yelling out his best ‘HO HO HO,’ he asked us if we all had been good all year and of course we all answered yes, we had. He then opened his big bag and handed out each a nice toy and then closed his bag and headed to the door, but turned around and said for us to get to bed early and he will return for some more goodies for us to open in the morning on Christmas day. Waving goodbye, he shouted Merry Christmas to us all.
My mom told us for years later that she had no idea who that was and no neighbor would confess it was any of them!! Who was it, well, it was, of course, Santa Claus. Only he would have a key to our front door, right...??”
Finally, speaking of playing Santa, Jeff from Florida shared a hilarious story about both the joys and dangers of playing Santa’s helper:
“Dad had been the Mall Santa enough years that he earned the privilege to be the official Santa for the arrival to mark the beginning of the Holiday season. The Mall wanted to add extra special characters to add to the excitement. Dad asked if a friend and I would be interested, so Frosty and Rudolph were added to the arrival festivities. I was to be Frosty.
Shortly before Santa’s arrival, the three of us, in costume, were held in a secluded location waiting for the arrival signal. I have to admit I was excited and a bit nervous regarding the prospects of playing the part for the children anxiously waiting. When the signal was given, Santa, Frosty and Rudolph entered a large area at the center of the Mall.
In the middle of this area was a large waterfall and pool area near Santa’s chair. A crowd of several hundred children and parents were assembled. Santa was to make his way to his chair at Santa’s Workshop. Frosty and Rudolph were to mingle among the children and assist in forming a line to visit Santa.
The Frosty suit involved a large round fiberglass middle and head, Frosty’s mouth was a black screen through which I was to see and navigate through the crowd. As I maneuvered through the children, they were very excited to see Frosty (and) shake his hand, along with countless hugs. At this time, I had lost sight of Santa and had no idea where Rudolph was. Due to my excitement and the encounters with all the children, I began to lose my sense of direction, adding to my nervousness.
My vision makes it necessary that I wear glasses. Slowly, the heat being generated inside Frosty’s head caused condensation to fog my glasses. It was about this time that I remembered the waterfall and pool. Visions of Frosty falling into the water filled my head, adding to the anxiety and fogging my glasses even more. Since my face was completely encased inside Frosty’s head, I was unable to get to my glasses. I soon learned that if I took a deep breath and blow out of Frosty’s mouth, it would help lessen the fog on my glasses.
However, after taking several breaths and with great effort to exhale out of Frosty’s mouth, I began to get a little lightheaded. And all this time I could feel all the little hands touching and hearing how much they loved Frosty as I blindly wandered among the children. Trying very hard to remain in character and not ruin such a happy time, I realized I had to regain control.
Just then, I realized that I could rub my face against the inside of Frosty’s head and knock my glasses off. This, of course, improved my sense of direction, though still not very clear. I was able to continue Frosty’s journey through the throngs of children without incident and especially avoid falling into the waterfall pool.
Beginning the Holiday season with Santa’s arrival taught me many things that day, most importantly, the joyful rewards of seeing the Christmas spirit in children’s eyes as they got to see the wonder of Santa Claus and hug Frosty the Snowman with his magic hat and Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer.”
Thanks, Jeff. I hope it also taught you that you’re going to keep playing Frosty, you’d better get contact lenses!
A Christmas Miracle
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
It’s become a tradition for me to share this story every year during Christmas because it proves that Christmas is a time for miracles. Not just the miracles that happened 2,000 years ago, but those that God is showing us every day if we just open our eyes and our hearts to see them.
Back in 2011, one of my radio listeners named Sheila from Oklahoma wrote to me:
"I was diagnosed with Hodgkins' Disease lymphoma and felt I had been given a death sentence. I believed it was the last time I would celebrate my young son's birthday, my last Thanksgiving and my last Christmas. So everything about Christmas was vital to me. I hand-wrote personal messages to everyone on my card list, carefully selected and wrapped gifts and insisted on decorating my home alone with my son, in spite of chemotherapy.
The tree was a full-day endeavor because I was fatigued, and, of course, I had to cherish the memories of each special ornament. The two of us struggled with the lights but were almost finished with the entire tree. I had sat down to rest (when) my son announced, 'Mom! The lights went out!'...
I know it is trivial, but it just knocked the wind out of me. I bowed my head and cried because changing the lights meant undecorating the whole tree, and I just didn't have the energy.
'Lord,' I prayed. 'I can't do this. I need this Christmas, but I can't do this.'
Then I heard my son gasp, and I looked up to see all the lights were on again. And they stayed lit throughout Advent to Epiphany. For this and many reasons, my first Christmas with cancer was my best ever."
That terrific story contained two miracles: A simple one reminiscent of Hanukkah, in which the lights stayed on as a message that you were not alone.
The second miracle: that story was about the Christmas of 1995. Sheila wrote to me to share it in 2011 -- 16 years after she thought she'd seen her final Christmas!
But wait: there’s now a third miracle. Over the years, I have often thought about Sheila and prayed that she is still alive and well. A couple of years ago, nearly a decade after she shared that story that has inspired so many, she contacted me again to tell me this:
“…I am so thankful that you have continued to share my miracles. The lymphoma relapsed in 2001 and I underwent an autologous bone marrow transplant and have been cancer-free since. I am a 25-year cancer survivor and I thank God for every day.”
Sheila, I hope that wherever you are, you are still in good health. I pray for you and thank you for sharing that inspiring story that has meant so much to me and my readers and listeners over the years.
Christmas memories that last forever
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Joe from Oklahoma shared a special Christmas memory that sounds like something the dad in “A Christmas Story” might have pulled.A Simple Christmas
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Back in 2011, inspired by my book “A Simple Christmas,” I asked listeners of my radio show “The Huckabee Report” to share their own favorite family Christmas memories.This Christmas Story Will Touch Your Digestive System
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
One thing everyone loves about the holidays is all the great foods we indulge in only once a year. Every family has its special dishes that simply must be on the table, from oyster dressing to yams with tiny marshmallows. But sometimes, they don’t make for a great combination, on the plate or in your stomach.
Kevin from Maryland wrote me that he grew up in a Norwegian family that always served the notorious fish dish, lutefisk, which he jokingly called, “the piece of Cod that passes all understanding." (The recipe involves soaking a piece of cod fish in lye for three days. Seriously.)
Kevin recalled:
“My mother, a fine teetotaling Christian who prided herself on never having alcohol in the house, was appalled the day my uncle brought a six-pack of beer as his contribution to the Christmas meal. To my mother’s horror, my father graciously accepted the libation. And so, in sullen silence, the family dinner was served...the traditional lutefisk and Godless beer.
I remember the smirk on my uncle's face as he began to eat the fish dish and wash it down with beer. My father, at the other end of the table shared in the merriment, while my poor grim-faced mother tried to remain polite...though sitting next to her, I was certain that she was asking God to strike her kin with righteous retribution.”
Now, at this point, Kevin went into some clinical details about the chemical reactions of the digestive system that I won’t relay here. Suffice to say that about half an hour into the meal, his dad and uncle suddenly excused themselves and bolted from the table. They both spent a miserable night of gastric distress, much to his mom’s quiet satisfaction.
Kevin said that was the Christmas he learned that mixing fish cured in lye with beer creates a volcanic reaction in the stomach similar to mixing vinegar and baking soda. He said it was also the year he learned that God answers prayers (his mother’s, at least.) And He's not above using science in working His will.
I want to thank Kevin for that unique story. While most of my listeners’ stories touched the heart or the funny bone, his was the only one that touched the digestive system.
Coming home this Christmas
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Sadly, this Christmas Eve, many families are unable to gather from far and near, as they usually do. But this story perfectly illustrates how only something as extreme as a pandemic can keep us apart from the ones we love at this blessed time of year.The Best Christmas Gifts of All
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Dale from Illinois shared a memory of when his family asked for no gifts, but got the best gift ever:
“My most memorable Christmas was the one that I asked for no gifts. We didn't decorate or even put up a tree. Seven weeks earlier, we had a new grandson. He was born with heart problems and was airlifted to a hospital in Peoria, Illinois, where they did heart surgery on newborns. He spent the first five weeks of his life in Intensive Care after two open heart surgeries.
My wife and I were so grateful to God for our grandson that we accepted him as our gift. There was nothing that could compete with God's gift of healing. Our grandson made a wonderful Christmas.”
You’ve heard the term, a “hard candy Christmas”? Well, Kathy from Kentucky recalled a Christmas when hard candy would’ve seemed like a luxury. And “not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse” was more than could be hoped for. But somehow, it can end up as a happy memory if you can just keep your sense of humor:
“To start with, it was a Christmas I will never forget. I had married at age fourteen, partly to escape the hand of life I was dealt, with parents neither of (whom) seemed to want me or my siblings. We were shuffled from here to there, staying with family or staying alone many nights by ourselves by the time I was 11 years old.
I had married so young trying to escape and have some kind of normal family. At least that’s what I felt at the time. I was much more mature at age 14 than most 25-year-olds today. It was our second Christmas together and we didn't have very much money, but I was 16 by this time and was expecting our first of four children I would eventually have. I so much wanted to have a Christmas tree and decorate it.
Well, with my meager budget, I felt the old-fashioned way might be my best bet. My tree had a few hand-me-down ornaments that were scratched and tattered. I also managed to buy a pack of the old-fashioned icicles that looked like shredded aluminum foil shavings. In 1973, we didn't have all the new shimmering decorations.
I also took a bag of cranberries and some popcorn and strung it to make a stream of garland. I thought our little hand-cut cedar tree was beautiful. It had taken me all day to string the cranberries and popcorn. I strung them around the tree trying to cut corners so they would cover more area. Finally, the tree was decorated.
That night, I went to bed with a few little presents and a beautiful tree. At the time, we lived in an old house we rented, and there were cracks big enough that you could throw a cat through around the windows. I was used to cold houses and not-so-fine furnishings. At 16, I was doing pretty good, I thought. I just couldn't wait to show my Christmas tree and what a fine job I had done.
I woke up the next morning and walked into our simple little living room to see my tree. My heart sank, I just couldn't believe it. The mice had eaten all my popcorn and several of the cranberries! I was devastated, but after the shock wore off, my husband and I just laughed and laughed
Even after that, I still put popcorn strings on our tree. Later, my four kids would help. The happiest Christmases I remember were ones when we had very little materially but had generosity in our hearts.
I have since gone to college with those four kids and am now a retired teacher. The one thing I always tried to teach my kids as well as my students is that it's not how much money you spend, it is about how much love and generosity is in your heart. Money does not make you happy, love does.”
Beth from Texas offered a story whose moral is that anything can become a cherished memory if it’s associated with the joy of Christmas, and I do mean ANYTHING!...
“For many years, my sister (who teaches Kindergarten) and I would deliver any gifts from the Angel tree at K-Mart that had not been picked up by Christmas Eve. Many of the names were ones familiar to my sister, and we loaded up the car and put on our Santa hats and went delivering in everything from snow to rain...this to us was the true meaning of Christmas.
One place we would always stop about half-way through our deliveries was the Beasley Memorial Funeral Home - it had a drive-up viewing window in front!
The first Christmas after K-Mart closed, my sister and I were both at loose ends on Christmas Eve. I drove us over to sit in the driveway of the funeral home so it felt more like Christmas Eve. Happy to say some of our best Christmas Eves were spent sitting in that driveway! Merry Christmas to you!”
Speaking of trees, sometimes the tree itself can be your best Christmas memory. One thing we all learned from “A Charlie Brown Christmas” is that it’s not how fancy your tree is that matters, it’s the love it represents. Vicky from California sent a beautiful story that illustrated that as well as Charles M. Schulz did.
Vicky recalled a time years before, when her young family was desperately poor and struggling to provide Christmas for their three small children. Her husband brought home a tree, but was so exhausted after working 14 hours, he hadn't noticed it was dead and brown on one side.
A neighbor tried to help by giving them a little 18-inch, lighted tabletop tree. Vickie thought it was so small and ugly, she began to cry at the thought that this shrunken thing would be their family's tree. Just then, her little daughter began to cry, too, and hugged her. But she was crying for a very different reason.
The little girl said in awe, “That is the most beautiful tree I have ever seen. Do we really get to have that as our tree this year?"
Vicki wrote, “I had a permanent attitude change. That night, I couldn't stop thanking our Heavenly Father enough for His blessings.”
Thank you, Vicki. That story puts a new spin on “a little child shall lead them.”
Finally, Andrea from Texas has a story of a Christmas tree that made Charlie Brown’s sad little tree look good. But just as in the classic “Peanuts” special, all it took was a little love to make it beautiful – and it wasn’t even technically a tree:
“During the time Carter was president, my mother was working two jobs. We still couldn't afford a Christmas tree. Living in Yuma, Arizona made it hard to find one to cut and use, obviously
One day my brother and I decided to surprise her before she came home. We found a tumbleweed of good size and made a stand for it. We made a star for the top out of the ‘tree’ out of cardboard, wrapping it in aluminum foil. Having some school glue and some glitter, we took little trinkets and decorated them, attached string and hung (them) on the tumbleweed.
When she came home, she couldn't believe her eyes. That was the prettiest Christmas (weed) tree. Although we didn't have any gifts and not much of anything else, it was one of the happiest Christmases we ever had. We told jokes, and Christmas cheer in our little home was abundant. I was only 13, but ‘til this day, that is one of the most memorable Christmases ever. God Bless and Merry Christmas to All!”
Merry Christmas to you, too, Andrea, and we hope you and your family are still tumbling along!
The best gift this Christmas is giving to others
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
On Christmas, we celebrate the birth of the One who told us, “Love thy neighbor as thyself.” But on holidays like this that emphasize parties and socializing, many people feel lonely or abandoned. This year, even people who normally get invitations may be feeling lonely and isolated. They may not realize how many people really do care about them. Let this story from Linda in North Carolina be a reminder:
"Several years ago, we had a family up the hill who were having a very rough time. They had broken glass in their windows, no heat and no prospects for a nice Christmas.
We got neighbors together and one day when they were gone, the men went up and put in new glass, bought heaters and warmed up their trailer and went to get them a Christmas tree. The ladies and kids made ornaments, went to stores and got donations of toys and clothing, food and electric blankets. We all met at the trailer, cooked, decorated, put up the tree, wrapped packages, and made beds with the new blankets then went to our home to wait for them to return.
A while later, the family came running down the hill in the snow and flew into our house, trying to tell us through tears what someone had done. The mother couldn't believe that so many people cared about them. She didn't realize it, but being able to do that for them made Christmas very special for all of us.”
Thank you, Linda, for that perfect story to remind us that the gifts that give us the most satisfaction aren’t those we get, but the ones we give to others.
Treasured Memories of Christmas
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
This time of year, one of the many great holiday songs we always hear is the late, great Glen Campbell’s “Christmas Is For Children.” That sentiment was also on the minds of many of my radio listeners whose most treasured memories of Christmas were tied to childhood – either their kids’ childhoods or their own.
Some were of the “Kids Say The Darnedest Things” variety. For instance, Joe from Georgia recalled when his son was 7, their church had a pancake breakfast with a “Happy Birthday Jesus” cake for the kids, and the Lord’s Supper for adults during the Christmas Eve service. His son tugged his sleeve and asked, “Dad, why am I allowed to eat the Lord’s Breakfast but not His supper?”
An eternal theological question, my son!
There's something about the excitement of Christmas that makes children even more hilariously discombobulated. Cleve from New Mexico wrote, "At our house, we always opened our presents on Christmas morning. I remember the first year my daughters were really, really, really looking forward to Christmas. On Christmas Eve morning, they jumped out of bed, ran into the kitchen, and hollered, 'Today's the night we get up in the morning!!'"
Well, they were right: it was!
Dolores from Texas recalled that during the Depression, her parents gave her and her sister Betsy Wetsy dolls, and made a little suitcase and a whole wardrobe for them. Dolores said it was the “best Christmas ever!” The girls were so excited, they didn’t even realize until years later that those were actually their old dolls, all cleaned up. The moral: To a child, a gift doesn’t have to be new…just new to THEM.
Claudine from North Dakota shared this:
“When my kids were little, the church was getting together some toys, gifts and food items for a poor family who had just moved to our area at Christmas time. While looking in the pantry to see what we might have extras of, I asked my children what they would like to give. My daughter - then six years old - went to her room and brought down her Barbie doll complete with Barbie outfits, that she loved to play with. It was her only one. When I said, ‘Oh, honey, you don't have to give your favorite doll’, she said to me, ‘Mommy, if you just give what you don't want, it's not really giving, is it?’”
When you “give till it hurts,” as some people put it, it can actually feel pretty good. Thank you, Claudine, for reminding us that sometimes, parents can learn from children.
BettyJean from California had a favorite childhood Christmas memory that reminds us not to look a gift horse in the mouth. She wrote:
"I was born in 1928 in a small town in Montana. My mother died in 1929... (and) we were very poor...One Christmas my friend, Rex, whose parents had a restaurant in town, gave me a beautifully wrapped present. I was SOOOO EXCITED! Christmas Eve, my brother and I unwrapped our two presents. My brother watched me unwrap mine: a box of candy. And I can still hear him, 70 years later...yelling out, "DAAAAAD! THERE'S A PIECE GONE!!!!!"
I guess that proves little boys haven't really changed much in all these years!
Of course, Christmas is also a time when many of us former children experience the sadness of memories of parents who are no longer with us. I received many stories from people who were rocked by a flood of emotions at something as simple as coming across an old family decoration that their dad made, or the smell of a favorite family dish that mama used to cook. You never know what unlikely things might trigger overwhelming emotions.
For example, Linda from Texas recalled that her grandfather’s last Christmas gift to her dad just before he died was a shirt. He never wore that shirt. But he kept it hanging in his closet for the rest of his life, carefully preserved as a reminder of his dad.
Ellen from Oregon would understand that feeling. Her mother died of a brain tumor that had scrambled her thinking and sometimes made her a little exasperating. Just before Christmas, she made a big production of being driven to the post office to buy Christmas ornament postage stamps. She debated at great length before settling on the design, which she insisted on calling the “Jingle Bell stamps.” The postal clerk put three sheets of stamps in an onionskin envelope for her. Her mom proudly took them home, wrote “Christmas stamps” on the envelope, and displayed them on the windowsill for all to see. It seemed a little silly to Ellen at the time.
One month later, as she and her sisters were cleaning out their late mother’s house, Ellen came across her mom’s beloved Jingle Bells stamps in the onionskin envelope with her handwriting on it. She wrote, “I took them into the bathroom and cried.” She took the envelope with the remaining stamps home with her. Long afterward, when her husband needed a stamp, she opened the stamp drawer, saw them again, and cried again.
She began calling them the “Jingle Bell stamps,” too. There are only three stamps left, and there always will be. Ellen said she could never use them. She wrote:
“It’s almost as if when those stamps are gone, one more thread will be cut…But somehow, I know I will never give up that little onion skin envelope. Whenever I buy stamps, it will always be in sheets, and I will always tuck them into that little onion skin envelope.”
Thank you for sharing that, Ellen. And please know that you are not alone. Many of us treasure things that might seem silly to others, but they hold value beyond gold to us. There’s no reason to be embarrassed about having a reminder of your mom in the stamp drawer. But it’s even better to know that we’ll always have memories of our loved ones who’ve left us tucked safely away in our hearts.
We Have Survived Hard Times
December 23, 2024
Mike Huckabee
These past few years have been tough financially for many people, but Anita in New Mexico reminds us that we have survived hard times before:
“In the 1950's, my stepfather suffered a severe illness. Christmas had always been ‘light weight,’ although we didn't know it; there was love to go around and a great dinner.
On Christmas Eve, the doorbell rang and there stood a group of church people, not from our church, with gifts, some wrapped, others were secondhand, but they were new to us!!!! There were more gifts than we had ever seen before, and my mother made sure some went to other homes.
I hadn't experienced such a love of giving before, and it always makes my memories of Christmas special to the point that I enjoy helping where I can and just enjoying the day with my husband with food and remembering exactly what the day is all about.”
These days, we have a phrase, “Random acts of kindness.” Jo from Tennessee shared out an anonymous act of generosity can seem like a miracle to the recipient:
“In May of 1991, my husband died suddenly of a heart attack. I was a ‘stay at home’ mom of three boys, ages 6, 8, and 10. We had $10,000 in life insurance and debt up to our eyeballs. I was so afraid we would wind up homeless that Christmas was out of my mind, until the church secretary called me into her office and gave me an envelope with my name on it.
It had been left for me anonymously and even my name was stenciled on the front, so I could not identify the writing. It contained $100, and I will never forget it.
My kids are grown and have their own homes now, but that gift made our Christmas easier when we were very sad and will be in my heart forever.”
Thanks, Jo, for sharing that, and we’re glad things are better for your family now. I hope your story encourages others to be generous to strangers in need. What might feel like a small gift to those who give it could be a miracle for those who receive it.
Jerry from Florida also shared a memory of a hard-time Christmas that was made wonderful by the generosity of others:
“My greatest Christmas was when I was five years old. My mother had taken my brother, sister and myself away from an abusive father, and we were on our own. To say we were poor would be an understatement. My mom rented an old house, and she supported us on a waitress’s wages. She refused to accept welfare and told us that as long as we had each other and love that we would make it. We had our own garden and even as small kids worked to help. We had so very little. Quite often, we had to drink powdered milk and eat bread and gravy three times a day. A hot dog was considered a luxury.
Christmas that year looked bleak. We had no money, but it was the happiest time of my life because we had love. Love of family and neighbors. There was one present for each of us kids that Christmas Eve as we went to bed.
On Christmas morning, we all came down to open our present. An unbelievable sight awaited us. We got to the door of the living room and our eyes widened. There were so many toys and presents that you couldn’t even hardly get in the room. Toy trucks!! Bicycles!!! Our joy and surprise were great.
We lived in a small town…Williamsfield, Illinois. Our neighbors knew we had so little. After us kids had gone to bed on Christmas Eve, the knocks on the door started. People from all over town brought things. That is the type of people I had the honor to grow up with. No government. No welfare. Just neighbors helping neighbors by living the Christian values we were all taught.
I think of that Christmas morning so long ago today and still get a smile and a tear. It was the greatest Christmas I ever had.
My mom went on to remarry to a great guy who adopted us. They worked hard to provide us a better life and live the American Dream. Mom went back to college after we were older and at the age of 38 graduated Summa Cum Laude and taught school for years. Today they live comfortably in retirement.
I think of those days and how poor we were, but I also think of the values instilled in me by a loving mother and a great community. Values that taught us about self-reliance and helping your neighbor. These were the greatest lessons learned from my greatest Christmas.”
Thank you, Anita and Jerry, for that reminder of what a difference it makes to have churches and communities that gather together to help those who are in need. We need that more than ever now, if our politicians would just stop waging war on our churches and communities.
Melvin from Oregon wrote to share memories of a couple of Christmases that were made very special, thanks to a grandfather who never forgot what it was like to be a kid at Christmas.
“Christmas 1944: I am four years old and my dad is still overseas, so mom and I are staying with my grandparents. Christmas eve, it's time for me to hang up my sock. I'm just getting ready to hang it on the mantle when grandpa comes in. He has a giant sock and a big metal wash tub. I ask him what he is doing, and this is what he tells me:
‘I'm going to hang this big old sock up.’ He hangs his sock up then he puts the wash tub under the sock. He shows me that there is a hole in the toe of the sock, and it has a tennis ball in the hole. He then tells me that ‘when Santa comes tonight, he will start putting good stuff in his big old sock, and the tennis ball will fall out.’ Santa will keep stuffing his sock and the presents will fall into the wash tub, and he will get way more stuff than I will in my little old sock.
Well, I'm only four years old, but I know this ain't right. I go running to grandma and tell her that grandpa is going to cheat Santa. Grandma says, ‘Don't worry, because I know that Santa is much smarter than your grandpa is.’ So I go off to bed, but I am not happy.
Christmas morning comes. I run downstairs and see that my grandpa has a sour look on his face. I see my sock has all kinds of good stuff in it. I look at grandpa’s sock, and the wash tub is full. It has an old rubber boot with a big hole in it, a big half-rotten squash, some chunks of coal, an old broken shovel etc., etc. I guess grandma was right after all. Santa is smarter than grandpa.”
The next year, Melvin’s grandpa was still putting creativity into Christmas…
“Christmas 1945. I am five years old, and we are still staying with my grandparents…My father was in Japan in the Second World War, his two brothers were in the European theater. All three came home OK. I thank God for that and for all of the men that have gone before.
We are trimming the Christmas tree. Grandpa comes in, and he has all of these walnuts that he has painted silver and put a yarn loop on to hang them with. I think they’re neat, but that’s about it.
Christmas morning, I come down and start opening my presents. Grandpa says, ‘Why don't you open one of those walnuts?’ I say ‘Naw, I got to open my presents’… Well grandpa keeps after me. Finally, I say, ‘Okay!’ So I crack a walnut open, and a penny falls out. Well, NOW I'm opening walnuts! There's dimes, nickels, and pennies. When I get done, I have about a dollar fifty, and that’s big money in 1945.
…My grandfather thought enough of me to take the time to cut the walnuts open and take out the meat for grandma to cook with. Then he put a coin in and glued each one back together, just to make a little five-year-old boy happy on Christmas morning.
Sixty-five years later, I don't remember anything else I got that Christmas. But I remember the walnuts and the love that went into making them. That might be something for young parents to think about... It really is the little things that count the most.”
Thanks, Melvin, for giving us all something important to remember before we go frantically hunting for whatever the latest “hot” gift is. It’s not so much the gift that we remember years later, but the person who loved us enough to give it to us that matters.
INNOVATIVE Self-Defense Solutions by BYRNA Technologies | Huckabee Today
December 19, 2024
Hostage deal should have already happened: Mike Huckabee | Newsline
December 19, 2024
Huckabee: They're underestimating what's coming under Trump
December 18, 2024
If Biden has dementia, should his pardons still stand? PART 2
December 18, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Yesterday, we dared to question the pardoning authority of a President who is clearly not playing with a full deck. The undercover video recently obtained by James O’Keefe makes it clear that those working with Biden have known how serious his condition was and just kept it quiet (at least until they went out on first dates).
Here’s PJ MEDIA on that video, in case you didn’t see our story, and even if you did…
Biden hasn’t been functioning well for a long time, but only in recent months has this been widely acknowledged, though his party declined to invoke the 25th Amendment. Not only has the sitting President pardoned close to 1,500 of his closest friends, but many more are reportedly anticipating blanket pardons along the order of what Hunter Biden received, covering them for whatever they might have done during a set period of time. This turns the whole pardon authority on its head.
“...Joe is only getting started,” said FOX NEWS’ Sean Hannity Tuesday night. “How many other Bidens will be pardoned by the time this is all said and done? Will Joe pardon himself, [with one of] these ‘pre-emptive’ pardons?” Hannity went on to cite a few confounding examples of Biden’s inexplicable clemency, such as the doctor found guilty of diluting chemotherapy drugs being given to cancer patients (!!!). Using presidential authority to let this person walk free after what she did is unconscionable.
Just wondering: How would Joe Biden have liked it if his son Beau’s doctor had done the same thing to Beau during his treatment for brain cancer? Would that have deserved clemency?
At the time this doctor was sentenced, U.S. District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III said, “It’s a very small thing to send this woman to jail for the next 20 years when you compare it to the damage she has done.” But for some reason, whoever put that piece of paper in front of President Biden for him to sign thought differently, and so this (former?) doctor has a get-out-of-jail-free card. We’d love to know what Judge Jordan thinks about this.
Biden also commuted the sentences of two Chinese spies convicted of espionage (WHAT??), as well as the relative of a high-ranking member of the Chinese Communist Party convicted of possessing over 47,000 images of child porn on his computer. This was reportedly part of a prisoner swap, an exchange for three Americans who were being held there.
At the time of the sentencing of one of the spies, Attorney General Merrick Garland said, “Today’s sentencing demonstrates the seriousness of those crimes and the Justice Department’s determination to investigate and prosecute efforts by the Chinese government, or any foreign power, to threaten our economic and national security.”
Well, so much for that!
The NEW YORK POST story is a must-read. (The POST has uncovered a wealth of CCP spying in New York City.)
https://nypost.com/2024/12/13/
Even the “fact”-checkers at NEWSWEEK have confirmed that the story on Biden giving clemency to these three Chinese criminals, two of them spies, is TRUE. This may or may not be part of a prisoner swap, they say.
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-
Of this transition period, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said, “When you look at the vote of the American people, and you look at how clear the issues were, and some of what’s gone on, it’s not technically treason, but it is certainly a deliberate and willful undermining of the American people --- not undermining Donald Trump; he’s undermining the American people.”
These are the American people who want a border wall built and a tougher relationship with China, he said. “And I’m watching what I think is a deliberate, and I think malicious and despicable, undermining of the American people.”
“...The Congress right now should be demanding records on every single commutation and pardon,” he continued, “’cause you have some really sick people who Joe Biden released. I have no idea how they got on the list, and we ought to be able to track down every memo, every single example. Why would these people, some of whom are pretty sick --- child pornographers, people who are totally corrupt, people who bankrupted small towns --- [have made that list]? What the American people deserve is the truth, and we ought to be committed to giving [them] the facts.”
Incidentally, Gov. Huckabee appeared on Hannity’s show Tuesday night, along with former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, to talk about the transition and the strategies Biden is using to leave a gigantic mess behind. Here’s that segment…
“I think [Biden] underestimates what Donald Trump is gonna do when he gets into office,” the Gov. said. “...That’s gonna be the beginning on January 20. And I can’t wait. It’s just not gonna get here quick enough.”
But that’s precisely the problem right now. Biden and his puppeteers still have about five weeks in which to do their dirty work. Much more clemency is likely, because why the heck not? As for short-circuiting this by invoking the 25th Amendment, that simply won’t happen when Cabinet members are in as much denial as the current ones are. A startling new report from REDSTATE reveals that even members of Biden’s own Cabinet, when polled recently by FOX BUSINESS NEWS Digital, continued to stand by statements they have made concerning Biden’s absolute fitness to serve.
This poll was taken even after First Lady Jill Biden, in September, was actually put in charge of a Cabinet meeting. And you’re aware of the President’s current state if you saw the undercover video obtained by James O’Keefe, in which someone who’s worked with Biden for over a year (probably longer) says everyone at the office knows the President is non-functional. Staffers and Cabinet members might admit it to each other, but they obviously are NOT going on the record.
Here’s an example of a statement made in September by one of Biden’s Cabinet members, HHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas:
"As I’ve said before, I come fully prepared for my meetings with President Biden, knowing his questions will be detail-oriented, probing, and exacting. In our exchanges, the President always draws upon our prior conversations and past events in analyzing the issues and reaching his conclusions." Mayorkas said he had “full confidence” in Biden’s ability. And on Monday, DHS stated that Mayorkas stands by his comments.
Good grief; they actually expect us to believe this.
“It’s a level of gaslighting rarely seen even in Washington,” says Becky Noble at REDSTATE. “Once Joe Biden is gone, will anyone finally speak up because they think it’s ‘safe’?”
Yesterday, when we first began to tackle the issue of Biden’s incapacity as he (or someone) commits presidential pardon abuse, we looked for input from an attorney whom we respected. Today, we have some, from Jonathan Turley. And he’s very concerned that this idea of “pre-emptive pardons” is going to fundamentally change the nature of presidential power. Turley --- perhaps because he grew up in the Democrat Party --- has strong insight into what they’re up to now and the damage they could wreak.
Such wholesale pardoning, he says, “will give Presidents cover to wipe away any threat of prosecution for friends, donors and associates. This can include self-pardons issued as implied condemnations of their political opponents. It could easily become the final act of every President to pardon himself and all of the members of his administration. We would then have an effective immunity rule for outgoing parties in American politics.
“...No President has seen fit to go as far as where Biden appears to be heading,” he says. It’s uncharted territory.
The Democrats have touted a Trump “enemies list” but can’t prove there really is one, Turley says, so they’re introducing a Biden pardon list in anticipation of Trump’s supposed revenge (which Trump says he’s not doing). “After years of lying to Americans about the influence peddling scandal and promising not to consider a pardon for his son,” Turley says, “Biden would end his legacy with the ultimate dishonesty: converting pardons into virtual party favors.”
“Joe Biden has become the President that Richard Nixon only imagined. He would establish with utter clarity that this power is not presidential, but personal and political...and many in the Beltway are waiting to give him a standing ovation.”
Unfortunately, Turley does not get into Biden’s cognitive issues here, the fact of his mental decline. Is there any way to legally address the validity of these many pardons and commutations --- and the precedent they set for future Presidents --- considering they’ve been signed by, as one investigator kindly put it, “an elderly man with a poor memory”? And what if it can be determined that most of these came from donors, lobbyists and even global adversaries, set quickly before a vacant-eyed old codger in need of a nap, as a pen is placed in his hand? After all, he has been officially declared by a DOJ special counsel to be too old and incompetent to stand trial on his handling of classified documents, so how is he legally competent to sign pardons that don’t even fit the legal definition of a pardon but of blanket “Get Out Of Jail Free” cards?
Mike Huckabee: I ‘love’ the way Trump does business
December 17, 2024
New O’Keefe video begs question: If President Biden has dementia, should his pardons stand?
December 17, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Before even getting into this, one caveat: Although we greatly welcome and always seek out input from attorneys we respect, we ourselves are not attorneys. At the same time, we revere the Constitution and believe we have a pretty solid idea of how the framers intended it to work. Although in Article II they gave the President the unfettered power of the pardon, they also gave us the 25th Amendment in part to avoid the scenario of a senile President issuing ill-advised and even absurd executive orders and pardons that others in his administration have likely put in front of him to sign, just as shady relatives might do with an incompetent grandfather’s “new will.”
Biden, if only by proxy, can do incredible damage on his way out the door.
Note also that our question isn’t WILL these pardons stand, but SHOULD they? Short answer: NO.
Now, to the discussion. A number of Biden’s roughly 1,500 (so far) pardons and commutations have garnered individual attention, for all the wrong reasons. One spectacular example is the commutation of the prison sentence for corrupt Judge Michael Conahan, convicted of his role in the so-called “Kids for Cash” scandal, taking huge kickbacks for committing minors to a particular private detention facility.
As Democrat Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro pointed out, “Some children took their lives because of this. Families were torn apart.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/
The DAILY CALLER cites Conahan, along with multiple other convicted Democrat politicians who were granted clemency.
President Biden, constitutionally, has the authority to pardon anyone, without any obligation to explain why he’s doing it.
But does he even KNOW why he’s doing it? Or know that he’s doing it at all?
This brings us to the latest James O’Keefe undercover video, dropped Monday, which offers word from one of Biden’s national security advisors that the sitting President is much worse off cognitively than the public knows.
And we already knew his condition was bad. We’ve witnessed countless presidential brain glitches. We’ve watched him go mentally vacant, or become physically lost, shaking hands with people who weren’t there, looking around to find his way offstage or wandering aimlessly off into the trees. Biden had noticeable issues for a long time, but they seemed to be progressing more rapidly in the past year or so, culminating in his scary-bad performance during the Biden-Trump debate.
After he dropped out of the race, his deterioration visibly accelerated even more.
Still, Democrats resisted using the 25th Amendment to replace him with Kamala Harris, much as that was the honest thing to do and even might have helped them chalk up political points. (Why they didn’t do this is a mystery we can’t begin to understand, because we are sane.)
O’Keefe’s video captures National Security Advisor Henry Appel speaking candidly to an undercover reporter about Biden’s mental state: “Joe Biden is, like, dead. Not literally. Like, he, like, can’t say a sentence.”
“He’s like, really progressed in his old age,” Appel said over a meal in a restaurant. “Everybody recognizes it. I can’t believe it wasn’t a bigger scandal earlier. He’ll be dead in a year. Or he’ll be, like, out of public life.”
Appel went on to describe a conversation in which Biden couldn’t understand the phrase “novel phenomenon.” When Jake Sullivan used that term, Biden became confused and said, “What, do you mean, like a book?”
Appel said, “The two meanings of the word ‘novel,’ like, he lost them.”
(Editorial aside: We assume it’s not dementia but some milder form of mental deficiency that causes some very annoying people to repeatedly interject the word “like” in conversations. Another symptom might be that it causes people in high level national security roles to run their mouths in front of undercover reporters.)
Appel went on to describe some phone exchange that will be very familiar to those who have family members with Alzheimer’s. Biden was calling while on a foreign trip; Appel thought it was to Europe. “I picked up the phone and said, ‘Hello, Mr. President. It’s Henry.’ And he was like, ‘Is Jake [Sullivan] there?’ And I was like, ‘No, he’s traveling with you. He’s on the same trip that you are.’
Another example: “A couple of weeks ago, I was, like, the last one in the office. And he [Biden] called for my boss [Sullivan]. And so I picked up the phone and said, ‘Hello, Mr. President. It’s Henry on Jake’s phone. He’s out for the day, but I can try to get him on the line for you.’” Appel described how Biden said he’d try to track Sullivan down, call his Secret Service detail or use his unclassified phone. “And then, like, ten seconds later, same phone rang. I picked it up again. I was like, ‘Hi again, it’s Henry.’ And he was like, ‘Is Jake there?’ And I was like, ‘No, you called the same office…”
“That was, like, a year ago.”
Appel works for the Intelligence Programs Directorate of the National Security Council. O’Keefe refers to him as a “former spy” and quotes government websites that say “the Division is responsible for overseeing and coordinating intelligence activities across various U.S. intelligence agencies, providing the NSC with crucial intelligence analysis to inform national security decision-making.” It is “essentially acting as the primary point of contact between the Intelligence Community and the National Security Council on intelligence matters.” In the video, Appel speaks of his team’s responsibility for providing senior policymakers with “all” the top secrets, noting that much of what his office does has to do with Ukraine. (Side note: In Trump’s new administration, these people will apparently be answerable to the new Director of National Intelligence [DNI]. Trump has nominated Tulsi Gabbard, who should start by firing them all and starting over.)
At the link, Mike Miller at REDSTATE relates the story Appel told about Biden, as difficult as that must have been for him because he lost his own mom to Alzheimer’s and recognized some of the same symptoms Appel was describing. And don’t miss O’Keefe’s video; it’s highly entertaining and well worth your time.
Incidentally, the conversation between Appel and the undercover reporter goes on, with Appel saying that he and members of the national security team were crying the night of Trump’s win and claiming they were all “trauma-bonded.” They’re also concerned at the prospect of Trump “coming after us [legally],” that he’d “investigate us or whatever.”
“I don’t know, they’d make up, like a fake scandal, or something…”
(As if they didn’t have enough real stuff to investigate.)
Fun note from O’Keefe: This person who has been entrusted with the nation’s most sensitive secrets says on his dating profile that his greatest strength is “oversharing on the first date.” And how!
…….
So, it’s obvious now, even to those who work most closely with him, that Biden is so cognitively impaired, any decision he makes as President has to be second-guessed. As Mike Miller says:
“Joe Biden is the sitting President of the United States. He figuratively has his finger on the nuclear button. He is handing out pardons to people, including his son Hunter, like they’re going out of style, not to mention that the pardon of Hunter and other undeserving recipients makes a mockery of justice.”
It should never happen again. “Heads should roll,” he says, “for it happening this time, and legislation or a constitutional amendment should be passed to ensure that it doesn’t.”
Some are still trying to pretend that Biden is of sound mind and actually came up with that vast list of people he personally wanted to pardon. No one who actually IS of sound mind believes that. Not being attorneys, we’re not sure of the best way to solve this problem, legislatively or judicially. What do we do when those in power care so little for the law that they just ignore the 25th Amendment and leave the nation rudderless and themselves unaccountable? Yes, we held an election and fixed it at the ballot box (thank God), but at least in our lifetimes, there’s never been a transition as potentially damaging as this.
RELATED: While roughly 1,500 of President Biden’s closest friends are being pardoned or getting their sentences commuted, Judge Juan Merchan, to no one’s surprise, has rejected the request from Trump’s legal team to dismiss the case against him based on presidential immunity. Trump attorney Todd Blanche had argued that evidence brought against Trump during the trial had involved his official duties and so was improperly admitted. Merchan doesn’t care.
This is the case New York v. Trump, in which Trump was convicted by a Manhattan jury of falsifying business records related to payments on the non-disclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels. (His office recorded them as “legal expenses.” Seriously, that’s what this is about.) The case, and the prospect even of a prison sentence (however unlikely), will now apparently loom until Trump is out of office at age 82 (although Merchan could still salvage a molecule or two of his legal reputation by simply voiding the bogus guilty verdict and throwing the entire case out, but don’t hold your breath.) Details here…
Further legal analysis at LEGAL INSURRECTION…
Also, as we reported last week, the DOJ has actually accelerated its indictments of still more J6 defendants, even though they know President Trump will pardon them precisely one nanosecond after re-entering the Oval Office on January 20. They don’t give a flip, and are apprehending at least two new J6 suspects every day. Here’s an update…
https://www.wnd.com/2024/12/
RELATED READING: Speaking of Tulsi Gabbard being Trump’s nominee for DNI, she’s got some organized opposition, in the form of a letter sent to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and soon-to-be Majority Leader John Thune. This letter reportedly is signed by members of left-wing organizations, intelligence agencies, defense contractors and groups targeting “election misinformation.” In other words, the Swamp, the very people who need to be gotten rid of. They don’t want her because she’s over the target (them). Show support for Trump’s choice; contact your Senators!
This is the ‘most significant’ move to be made since October 7: Huckabee
December 16, 2024
About those drones
December 16, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Not since all the empty talk about Kamala Harris’ many paths to victory have cable news outlets expended more time on a subject they know nothing about than on the mysterious drone sightings. Most talked about it all weekend, and we still know no more than we did on Friday. We have the same vague White House reassurances that the drones aren’t foreign spies or invaders or dangerous, while simultaneously claiming that the government doesn’t know what they are.
And of course, we have the not-at-all reassuring claims that there’s nothing the government can do about them, which nobody in his right mind believes. Well, considering the way Biden let Chinese spy balloons float all the way across the country before shooting them down, maybe this Administration really is that incompetent. But it’s not likely to go on past next month, since Trump posted this on Truth Social Friday:
“Can this really be happening without our government’s knowledge? I don’t think so! Let the public know, and now. Otherwise, shoot them down!!!”
It seems reasonable to assume that they must be US government aircraft or they’d be gone by now…
https://www.foxnews.com/us/nj-drone-sightings-could-classified-exercise-former-cia-officer
We’re not going to fill the newsletter with pointless speculation about what these drones are, but we will give you some useful information. First, you might read this article by Brandan Smith. Please note that we make no endorsement of his theory about this being a false flag operation by the US government for nefarious purposes. That’s speculation, and nobody knows yet what they are. But this article has a lot of information about laws, regulations and technical specs of drones that may help us deduce what they are NOT.
https://americafirstreport.com/unidentified-drones-in-americas-skies-smells-like-a-false-flag/
There are also conspiracy theories being floated about what they are, from a false flag operation to simulate an attack by a foreign power and lure us into World War III, to an attempt to panic the public into demanding more government protection and thwart Trump’s agenda. to them being radiation detectors looking for a dirty bomb. Again, these are all unconfirmed speculation, but unlike the government, we think people should be informed of all claims and opinions so they can sort them out for themselves rather than having the government censor the ones it doesn’t like.
That brings us to a theory that’s spreading online that this is something called Project Blue Beam. That’s a conspiracy theory dating back to the 1990s that global elites plan to use high technology and drone lights in the sky to simulate an alien invasion or theological event to undermine religious beliefs and fool people into accepting a fake global religion and one-world government.
https://www.newsweek.com/what-project-blue-beam-conspiracy-theory-erupts-over-drones-2001051
If that’s the plan, they’re launching it a bit late. By this point, we’ve all seen amazing synchronized drone light shows in Fourth of July fireworks displays. Our reaction wouldn’t be “Martians are invading!” it would be more like, “What are those drones doing up there?”
And that’s exactly the question we all have. We’ll write about this again when we actually get an answer to it.
Larry Gatlin on America, Faith, and SERVING TROOPS | Huckabee Today
December 16, 2024
More admitting we were right all along about January 6
December 16, 2024
“My big issue is that I’m really, really sick and tired of every time I turn around, finding something else that the Democrats have lied about or downplayed or misrepresented along the way.”
That was podcaster Stephen A. Smith, speaking about the latest revelations about January 6. He had a message to the Democrat Party, saying he was sick of the fact that when the likes of Megyn Kelly and Sean Hannity (and we’d be in that category) had anything to say “about something pertaining to y’all, THEY SEEM RIGHT.”
Well, we ARE right. We’ve been right over and over and over again.
“They’ve actually made Donald Trump look like HE was right,” Smith said. Well, yes. That’s because he was.
We learned from DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s J6 report last week that dozens of FBI informants (but only three “employees” per se) were at the Capitol building on January 6, 2021. The media have been trying to soften this story as much as they can. One example: A headline from THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, quite a Democrat propaganda rag in a predominantly red state, said, “Review finds FBI missteps,” with the subhead, “...Report debunks theory of bureau’s involvement, participation.”
Um, did they READ the report? But that’s the DMN for you. (And they ran the AP story; same deal.) This is why your humble writers choose to use its pages to line their parrots’ cages.
Anyway, back when Mike Lee was asking questions of FBI Director Christopher Wray about FBI involvement in January 6, Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney called him a “nutball conspiracy theorist.” But the report shows he was right to ask. Long before it came out, but after she posted some J6 video, he responded, “Liz, we’ve seen footage like that a million times. You made sure we saw that --- and nothing else. It’s the other stuff --- which you deliberately hid from us --- that we find so upsetting. Nice try. PS. How many of these guys are feds? (As if you’d ever tell us).”
Well, now we know.
https://twitchy.com/samj/2024/
Word is getting around that one of the FBI confidential human sources (informants) who entered the Capitol on January 6 --- an action for which many people are currently serving jail time --- not only was not prosecuted but also got his travel expenses reimbursed. He later attended the inauguration, also with his bill footed by Uncle Sam.
As we quoted Michael Stenger, U.S. Senate Sergeant-at-Arms during January 6 (now deceased), “Investigations should be considered as to funding and travel of what appears to be professional agitators.” You can see him here…
https://twitchy.com/samj/2024/
What, professional agitators working with the FBI? How shocking!
And, of course, Wray hasn’t left yet. The WASHINGTON TIMES ran a story about his plan to promote senior employees and somehow delay presumed incoming FBI Director Kash Patel by “three to four months.”
“If Wray succeeds,” the INDEPENDENT SENTINEL reports, “Patel will likely have trouble running the FBI effectively, as Wray’s deep state goons constantly leak and defy orders without repercussions. This would be great news for dangerous criminals and awful news for law-abiding Americans.”
Patel had better have a plan for dealing with this. But we have a feeling that, given his experience with these people, he does. It needs to involve firing a lot of people, even those who just got promoted. Especially them.
https://www.
When the J6 report came out, one aspect of it was glaringly missing: the pipe bomber story. As Victoria Taft reports in PJ MEDIA, “The radio silence on what we’ve been assured are ‘viable’ pipe bombs planted outside the DNC and near the RNC on J6 continued in the Inspector General’s report when he offered only a few treacly paragraphs on the issue.” The bombs were quickly dispensed with in just one mention on page 49.
This is looking more and more like a planned diversion (by...who?) to stop the counting of Electoral College votes when it was known Republican senators might be prepared to offer evidence of questionable ballot counting, perhaps even calling for an audit of the election. Both bombs were “discovered” a very short while before the certification was scheduled to start.
Taft describes how she thinks this plan would have gone: “All available cops would be sent to the bomb reports, the count would stop, Kamala Harris, the nation’s first woman of color who ascended to the nation’s second most powerful position and could have been killed by a ‘viable’ pipe bomb, would be feted as a woke heroine and survivor. Joe Biden would officially be declared the winner. Game over.”
We’ve never learned why VP-elect Kamala Harris --- there’s a name you won’t be hearing very often from now on, except in this context --- left the Capitol building to go to DNC headquarters that day. Was she ever asked about this (or anything else) for the IG report? NO.
Turned out, the Democrats didn’t need their pipe bomb story, because they got their riot.
Taft reminds us that all the Secret Service communications from both January 5 and 6 were destroyed in a very conveniently timed cell phone swap. This happened in spite of four congressional committees ordering them to keep the data. And even the “geofencing” that was used --- and continues to be used --- to track down J6 rallygoers was “corrupted” in the case of the so-called bomb planter.
Taft concludes that we were promised answers by the IG and got none, certainly about the pipe bombs, which were all but ignored. Having called the pipe bomb story “the smoking gun” of January 6, investigative reporter Darren Beattie entreats Kash Patel: “As uncomfortable as it is, we will need soon-to-be FBI Director Kash Patel to take the sham pipe bomb story to its final conclusion. I can hand it to him on a silver platter.” And he can.
Just a thought: this is one reason Chris Wray might want to delay Patel’s assumption of the directorship at the FBI.
https://pjmedia.com/victoria-
Taft made the case over the weekend that “FBI agents were everywhere” that day. She includes an excerpt from the IG report featuring a description of “SWAT teams” responding to the pipe bomb discoveries. “Are SWAT members for the FBI not AGENTS?” she asks rhetorically.
“So, if we take the IG’s conclusion at face value,” Taft says, “if there were no FBI UNDERCOVER AGENTS there, how come there were so many FBI AGENTS there? And does the lack of a uniform determine whether entrapment has taken place?” The IG report seems to have just muddied the water.
https://pjmedia.com/victoria-
As outlined in a new report, Michael Byrd, the Capitol Police officer who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt on January 6 (and was recently promoted to captain), was recommended for termination in 2001 for abandoning his post and lying about it to Internal Affairs. A source told BLAZE MEDIA investigators that this was one of three disciplinary cases “for which records could not be found when a House oversight subcommittee [this must be Barry Loudermilk’s committee] requested them in early 2024.”
For when you have time, there’s much more here about Byrd’s dicey history with the Capitol Police. Even after killing an unarmed person, Byrd was helped financially and continued to fail up.
Bonchie at REDSTATE takes an even harsher tone.
In this highly recommended piece, John Solomon has more about the favoritism and financial benefits directed towards Byrd, much more than what other officers have received. Why?
Last week, the sentencing of one J6 defendant (on the same nonviolent charges that most J6 defendants have pleaded guilty to or been found guilty of), Philip Grillo, got pretty wild, as he and presiding Judge Royce Lamberth exchanged words.
Before handing down the sentence, Judge Lamberth said, “I will do my job as I’m bound by oath to do, and the President will do his. It’s as simple as that.” He said the administration of justice is necessary “no matter what the political winds of the day.” (Not that the political winds had anything to do with this case being in his courtroom in the first place. For someone who says he doesn’t care about the political winds, he has done his share of politicizing.)
Then Lamberth, true to Julie Kelly’s depiction of him as “one of the cruelest judges,” sentenced Grillo to a year in prison --- to begin IMMEDIATELY --- followed by one year of supervised release.
But Grillo had the final word. As he stood there, with the U.S. Marshal taking off his tie and belt and placing him in handcuffs to transport him to prison, he yelled at Lamberth, who was exiting the room, “Trump’s gonna pardon me anyways!”
And we’re counting the minutes till that. In the meantime, Jonathan Turley is asking why the FBI informants whom we now know were at the Capitol walked free when nearly 1500 American citizens faced charges, some for just wandering through the Capitol building like tourists. FOX NEWS’ Martha MacCallum talks with him here; you can also see Tucker Carlson’s revealing interview with former Capitol Hill Police Chief Steven Sund, if you missed that.
To end on a positive note, President Trump has just named Devin Nunes, former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and current CEO of Truth Social, to lead the Intelligence Advisory Board. (He will stay on in his position with Truth Social.) This board, made up of non-government people, “exists to provide an independent source of advice on the effectiveness of the intelligence community’s data and its data acquisition.”
Nunes is up there with Kash Patel as a great choice to help oversee reform of the intel community. You know the IC can’t stand it, which is a good sign
https://www.newsmax.com/
Big Secret Service update; final House Task Force report released
December 12, 2024
With unidentified drones hovering over New Jersey (or as that would be known in Texas, “target practice”) and Secret Service documents on the attempted golf course shooting of President Trump still being withheld, Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley says it’s time for the acting Secret Service director to hit the road.
Hawley didn’t mention the catch, but we all know: Trump can’t fire acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe until he takes office on January 20. And the whole agency needs an overhaul. In the meantime, every day between now and Inauguration Day (and after), Trump’s life is at incredible risk.
As reported Tuesday by FOX NEWS, the bipartisan Congressional Task Force on the Attempted Assassination of Donald J. Trump, which investigated both attempts on Trump’s life, confirms the Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security has failed yet again, this time to produce documents related to the apparent wannabe Trump assassin who set up camp with an AK-47-style rifle in September on the perimeter of Trump International Golf Course in Florida. The man’s presence there in the bushes was given away only by a flash of light on the muzzle of his gun.
“How is it possible that you have no urgency when you have drones the size of a dining room table flying all over the state of New Jersey and nobody seems to care?” Sean Hannity asked Sen. Hawley on Tuesday night.
Hawley accused the Secret Service of not wanting to cooperate. “They don’t want us to know the facts,” he said. “They’ve stonewalled, they refuse to testify, they refuse to turn over documents…”
He is convinced that Rob Rowe, who was promoted from deputy director after former Director Kim Cheatle’s departure, has got to be relieved from duty.
“I mean, he is not doing his job,” Hawley said. “He endangered the life of the President with his poor response. And for them to stonewall the American people, this many months after not one but two assassination attempts, just like the FBI and the rest are stonewalling us now on these drones over New Jersey --- and who knows where else...that they’re not telling us about? --- it’s time for some accountability at these agencies. It’s time to clean house.”
As for the shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania, Hawley said they had “whistleblower after whistleblower” come forward to say the Secret Service had failed to secure the buildings, and their claims are confirmed in the House report. It was the same at the golf course, where agents reportedly ignored the protocol of doing a sweep of the perimeter.
“I mean, it’s a miracle Trump is alive,” Sen. Hawley said.
Hannity suggested bringing in Special Forces “to reinforce the good agents that do work for the Secret Service.”
As for the large drones flying over New Jersey, Sen. Hawley said just what we would think, which is to say, “You can’t tell me that they don’t know what that is. I just think they’re not being honest with us. If we don’t know --- if our government really has no idea --- then they’re even more incompetent than I thought.”
“...They need to level with the American people about what’s going on. It’s crazy.”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6365833152112
The 180-page Task Force report is calling for specific changes to the Secret Service, including possibly moving it from the jurisdiction of Homeland Security, where it has been since DHS was created after 9/11. Before then, it was part of the U.S. Treasury Department, and it still divides its efforts to continue investigating fraud and financial crimes. It also protects foreign dignitaries while they’re in the U.S., with the number of people it’s been tasked with protecting “greatly expanded” in recent years. The Task Force recommends that its array of responsibilities be reviewed so that the agency --- especially during campaign season --- “can prioritize the protection of U.S. leaders and candidates running for office.” Their mission there has to be one of “zero fail.”
One big problem, they say, is that the U.S. General Assembly meets in New York City every September. “The Secret Service’s protective mission is at the core of the agency’s purpose,” they say in their report. “Anything that distracts or diverts resources from the agency’s zero fail mission must be reconsidered.” This year, as it does every four years, the Assembly fell at the height of a presidential election campaign season. (Certainly, this is a factor. We would mention, though, that the Butler, Pennsylvania, shooting, which was a total Secret Service disaster and abject humiliation, took place on July 13.)
“Congress, DHS and the USSS [U.S. Secret Service] should jointly consider the protective role the USSS plays for foreign leaders and consider whether such duties can be transferred or abrogated in order to focus on the USSS’s primary duty: to protect the President and other critical U.S. leaders,” the report says.
If you’d like a deep dive, here’s the full, 180-page report.
Fortunately, once Trump gets back to the White House, he can fire anyone he wants to, and if Biden doesn’t like it, he’ll have no one to blame but himself. You see, Democrats’ way of using the most expedient, right-now strategy to get what they want sometimes comes back to bite them, and that happened after former White House press spokesman Sean Spicer was fired from his position on the Board of Visitors to the United States Naval Academy, even though he had a three-year term. When he challenged his firing in court and lost, that decision gave the incoming President legal backing to fire any of Biden’s over 4,000 appointments, immediately. Ha ha.
RELATED TRANSITION NEWS: In quite a stunning development, Trump’s pick for FBI director, Kash Patel, confirms that he was one of over three dozen staffers and two members of Congress whose communications were improperly swept up by the DOJ during the so-called “Russia” investigation in 2017. The DOJ obtained phone records without notifying the courts that the search involved members of Congress or congressional staffers. They were also trying to get their hands on emails from reporters at CNN, the WASHINGTON POST, and THE NEW YORK TIMES. This has just come out in a report from DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz.
Also, there is this: “Another former staffer, Jason Foster, previously told JUST THE NEWS that he confirmed that the government successfully asked a federal court to hide its spying on Congress for five consecutive years.” At the time Foster was being spied on, he was chief investigative counsel for Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
We find this story quite ironic considering that Patel, in early 2018 as chief investigator for then-House Intel Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, was the one who discovered the improper surveillance of Carter Page. There was a whole lotta spyin’ goin’ on, and probably still is. That’s one thing Patel is going there to fix.
As Nunes told FOX NEWS Digital, “The feds spied on Kash during the probe and ran information warfare against him, but Kash helped expose them anyway.”
A new piece from Brooke Singman mentions this revelation and also offers a history lesson on Kash Patel as Trump’s perfect pick to head the FBI. It’s not surprising that there’s panic in the swamp over Patel’s installation there in just a little over a month. They’ll try anything to derail his nomination.
RELATED: There’s something else that just needs to end, but it won’t at least for now. That’s the state-level lawfare brought by State Attorney General Letitia James in New York and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in Georgia. James says she will not drop the civil fraud case against Trump, the one in which no one doing business with Trump had any problem at all. She’s just sent a letter to Trump’s attorneys to that effect.
And Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg is reportedly “laying out alternatives” to dismissing the case against Trump on falsifying business records for payments on a non-disclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5032679-bragg-trump-hush-money-conviction/
To wrap this up, here’s an amusing postscript to our commentary from yesterday on the need for accountability for members of the Biden administration who broke laws. It’s a brief video montage of new California Sen. Adam Schiff (we feel for you, sane Californians who didn’t vote for him) speaking about whether outgoing officials should be indicted. The comments are from 2018, 2019 and now 2024.
Note that consistency is not his strong suit.
Daniel Penny speaks after verdict
December 12, 2024
Last night, Marine veteran Daniel Penny gave his first post-acquittal interview to Fox News’ Judge Jeanine Pirro. He demolished the false narrative that he’s a racist who targeted and strangled a black man. Penny said, “He was threatening to kill people,” adding:
"I didn't want any attention or praise, and I still don't. The guilt I would've felt if someone did get hurt, if he did do what he was threatening to do, I would never be able to live with myself. And I'll take a million court appearances and people calling me names and people hating me just to keep one of those people from getting hurt, or killed."
You can read more and see the interview here:
We don’t say this often, but hats’ off to New Yorkers. They deserve credit both for the jurors who refused to buy Alvin Bragg’s racialized, politicized prosecution of Penny, and also for having voted out of office “Squad” member Jamaal Bowman. Bowman took time out from disrupting Congress by setting off false fire alarms to pen an unhinged racist screed about the Penny verdict. It’s being met with the negative reactions it richly deserves.
Of course, Bowman isn’t the only leftist trying to rewrite the facts of this case to turn it into a “white supremacist” killing (they conveniently ignore the fact that two minority men helped Penny hold down subway attacker Jordan Neely, who was threatening passengers of various races.) Elizabeth Stauffer at Legal Insurrection has a good article on the actual facts of the case and some of the hyperbolic rhetoric that’s being spewed in an attempt to gin up divisions and racial violence.
We also shouldn’t ignore the slanted media outlets like the New York Times that are trying to depict Neely as a “subway rider,” “street performer” or “Michael Jackson impersonator,” leaving out inconvenient details such as that he was a mentally-unbalanced drug addict with a lengthy criminal record who was threatening to kill the other passengers.
So New Yorkers, if you want to keep up your winning streak, here are your next two moves: Vote out Alvin Bragg and cancel your subscriptions to the New York Times.
Happy Birthday, Brenda Lee
December 12, 2024
During the season when we hear “Rockin’ Around the Christmas Tree” twice an hour, let’s take a moment to wish a happy 80th birthday to “Little Miss Dynamite,” Brenda Lee. Brenda’s powerful voice propelled a number of songs to the charts in various genres from country to pop to rockabilly. She’s sold over 100 million records worldwide, and her 1960 hit “I’m Sorry” made her only the second woman to top the Billboard Hot 100 after Connie Francis. Last year, “Rockin’ Around the Christmas Tree” hit #1 again, making her the oldest artist ever to top the Billboard charts.
And now, something you won’t find anywhere else. Newsletter reader "opaobie" shares this personal anecdote about Brenda Lee. When his Oklahoma-born wife was a teenager, she saw Brenda at the Grand Ole Opry early in her career and it left a lasting impression:
“They were in the ladies’ restroom, and Brenda Lee accidentally left a (big diamond) ring on the sink after she washed her hands and walked out. My wife picked it up and went out and found her and returned it before she went backstage.
Brenda gave a shout out from the stage as she started her performance to the honest girl who found and returned her ring, proving that all the good things she had heard about ‘Okies’ (were) true...What a thrill for a young teenage girl.”
Just one of many thrills Brenda Lee has given us over the years. Happy Birthday!e
Some liberals have smugly assured the media that Pete Hegseth’s nomination as Defense Secretary is doomed, with one saying he’s like Bruce Willis in “The Sixth Sense” (SPOILER ALERT!): “He’s dead but just doesn’t know it yet.”
Someone forgot to tell that to Hegseth, or to Trump and J.D. Vance, who are doubling down on their support for Hegseth. And after having a second meeting with him – plus getting an earful from constituents – Republican Sen. Joni Ernst now seems to be leaning toward confirming him.
There are a lot of ways in which Trump 2.0 is unlike the Trump who came to DC in 2016 with no experience at dealing with the eels and snakes inhabiting the swamp. He’s wise to their games now, and Democrats need to learn that decades-old sleazy accusations by anonymous sources are no longer a lethal political weapon.
The Amazing Kreskin Goes to the Great Beyond
December 12, 2024
By “Huckabee” pop culture guru Pat Reeder (http://www.hollywoodhifi.com)
I’m sad to have to report that one of my favorite performers, magician and mentalist The Amazing Kreskin (born George Kresge), has died at 89, just one month shy of his 90th birthday.
https://variety.com/2024/tv/
Kreskin was one of the most popular talk show guests of the 1970s, author of numerous books, and he kept current with social media and regular videos on YouTube. From 1972 to 1975, he hosted the syndicated TV series “The Amazing World of Kreskin,” reruns of which made me a fan. While some magicians accused him of making people believe in psychic powers, he wrote in his 1991 book, “Secrets of the Amazing Kreskin,” that he is “not a psychic, an occultist or fortune teller. I am not a mind reader, medium or hypnotist. There is nothing supernatural about anything that I do. I am a scientist, a researcher in the field of suggestion and ‘extrasensory’ perceptions. I perform what I discover.”
While Kreskin never attempted to sing, he did record a spoken-word album in 1967 called "The Basic Principles of Kreskin's ESP."
https://www.discogs.com/
The 2008 movie "The Great Buck Howard" was inspired by the writer/director's time as Kreskin's road manager. And does anyone remember his Milton Bradley board game, “Kreskin’s ESP,” featuring the swinging “mystery pendulum”?
Finally, a flashback to four years ago, when Kreskin was still performing and made a memorable appearance on “Huckabee” on TBN. RIP and Godspeed into the Great Beyond!
A Note on the News
December 12, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Much of the current news coverage is dominated by details about the alleged murderer of United Healthcare executive Brian Thompson. We’re being inundated with information about the suspect’s life, mental state, education, social media posts and potential motives (like this theory by a retired FBI agent that he might have been “triggered” to murder an insurance executive because he was 26, the age when people are kicked off their parents’ insurance under Obamacare.
Let’s not forget that 26 was chosen because that was the latest possible age that liberals could pick to designate someone as an “adult,” despite the fact that for generations, 18 has been considered legal adulthood for marrying, joining the military and signing contracts – like buying your own insurance.
If that’s what “triggered” him to commit murder, then it’s just proof that he’s either mentally unstable or a perfect example of an emotion-driven, infantilized, 21st century leftist, which is not grounds for an insanity defense, although maybe it should be.
Frankly, we don’t care what might have “triggered” him to commit a cold-blooded, execution-style murder. If he’s guilty, he should pay the price. What matters is that an innocent human being is dead, (allegedly) because of his violent, selfish actions. That should be the focus of the news coverage. That and the horrifying reactions from leftists who are trying to rationalize, justify and even celebrate this shocking murder.
From killing “inconvenient” babies in the womb to making the Boston Marathon bomber look like a rock star on the cover of Rolling Stone to cheering for the assassination of Donald Trump to celebrating this pathetic sicko, the left in America is demonstrating that it has lost all regard for the sanctity of human life as well as any basic human decency. “The Daily Show’s” studio audience even booed a mention of his arrest, and they didn’t seem to be booing him.
Even some Democratic Senators don’t seem to have grasped the idea that no matter what you’re upset about, murder is ALWAYS unjustifiable.
They fail to see the irony in denouncing Trump as an “authoritarian” while cheering for the murder of anyone they disagree with, one of the most common actions of the worst authoritarian regimes in history.
So if you’re driven to know every detail about this suspect’s life, like whether he was so angry because his parents didn’t pat him on the head when they tucked in to bed at the age of 25, look elsewhere. We’ll cover the trial, honor the victim and shine a spotlight on the horrifying reactions because that’s where the real news is.
RELATED: Some more recent and historical commentary about the left’s “sick hypocrisy” in claiming to be tolerant and non-violent while celebrating the killing of its opponents.
https://instapundit.com/689466/
ALSO RELATED: More evidence of the pro-violence/anti-Semitic leftist stain on American universities:
O.S. Hawkins on Finding the SPIRIT CODE in Scripture | Huckabee Today
December 12, 2024
Syria Update
December 12, 2024
While many media outlets were celebrating the overthrow of the Assad dictatorship in Syria, we warned that as good as that news was, the new bosses may be just as bad or worse, since they’re a collection of radical Islamic militants led by a former al-Qaeda leader. Well, it’s only been a few days, and the world is fast learning some hard truths. The rebels are reportedly already executing their opponents, kidnapping women, imposing Sharia law and threatening non-Muslim populations, such as the Kurds.
Meanwhile, the Taliban terrorist government of Afghanistan (thanks, Joe) congratulated the rebels and said, “We express hope that the remaining phases of the revolution will be managed in a way that secures a peaceful, unified, and stable system.” Feel free to shudder at that thought.
As that article reports, the Syrian terrorist leader is doing a full-court propaganda press to the Western media, assuring them that they won’t oppress the Syrian people, and outlets like CNN appear to be falling for it. As Beege Welborn at Hotair.com reports in entertainingly brutal style, our incompetent Secretary of State Antony Blinken also seems to be falling for it.
All this while Israel is again being criticized for taking advantage of the chaos to wipe out Assad’s war-making facilities before they fall into the rebels’ hands. And the Biden White House does deserve credit for reiterating our support for Israel in defending itself. A word of warning: If Israel doesn’t destroy Assad’s chemical weapons, someone will have to do it, and we doubt it will be the terrorists some media outlets are fawning over.
Here’s video of Gov. Huckabee with more on this story from News Nation:
https://www.mikehuckabee.com/latest-news?id=A754564E-7B61-4A96-8BC7-A3BC5C89EEC0
Bidenomics increases inflation again
December 12, 2024
The Labor Department reported Wednesday morning that in November, the consumer price index rose 2.7% from 12 months before, while the core inflation rate, which excludes food and energy prices, rose 3.3% from a year before. That’s a 0.3% increase, the fastest rise in prices since March. This marks the second consecutive month of accelerating inflation, and the fastest increase in four months. Wait, we thought Biden had "fixed" inflation!
So Biden and Harris are leaving office the same way they came into it: expanding government regulations, rushing through wasteful spending, defying the will of the people, prosecuting their political opponents and increasing inflation. Meanwhile, the press continues to run “think pieces” about why the Democrats lost.
RELATED: Well, there is one difference between Biden’s start and his ending. He’s leaving even less popular than he was when he came in. In fact, a new poll suggests that thanks to his pardon of his son Hunter, by the time he moves out of the White House, his family might be the only Americans who still approve of him.
George Seay on Trump’s Plan to REVIVE the Economy | Huckabee Today
December 12, 2024
Elliott Abrams: TRUMP'S STRATEGY Against HAMAS and IRAN | Huckabee Today
December 11, 2024
Mike Huckabee ‘commends’ Biden admin support for Israel’s self-defense | Vargas Reports
December 11, 2024
So, do J6 Committee members deserve to go to jail? WILL they?
December 10, 2024
On Monday, Jonathan Turley, one of our go-to legal experts, wrote a column sparked by a comment this weekend by President Trump on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that the whole J6 Committee --- the sham House committee chaired by Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson and now-ex Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney --- “should go to jail.” Turley said that with this statement, Trump has undermined his previous statement that he did not plan to be a vengeful President, that success would be his revenge.
First, let it be said that to remark, as Trump did, that someone SHOULD go to jail is not the same thing as actually SENDING them to jail as political prisoners, as Democrats themselves did with a large number of J6 defendants. Do Democrat members of that committee deserve to spend a considerable amount of time as guests of the Graybar Hotel, considering what they did to corruptly shape the narrative of January 6, even to the point of destroying evidence that was supposed to be turned over to the Republicans who now head the oversight committees? Yes, they do deserve it, and Trump is right to say so.
Turley is right, however, to say that Democrats are going to use Trump’s statement, just as they twist everything else he has ever said, to try to justify Biden’s wholesale pardoning of his son and probably a lot of other people who deserve prison time.
Still, we wonder if Turley should say that “there’s no viable criminal case to be made against the J6 Committee members for their investigation or report.” We’re not attorneys but are dismayed that even looking into this strikes Turley as unseemly when he says, “We need to move beyond the rage rhetoric if this country is going to come together to face the tough challenges ahead.” The point needs to be made (so we’ll make it) that this country will not come together if Biden can just pardon all his friends and allies and there are no consequences for anything any of them ever did.
Trump was absolutely right to criticize the committee’s deletion of evidence from their investigation. “Cheney did something that’s inexcusable,” he said, “along with Thompson and the people on the un-select committee of political thugs and, you know, creeps.” Love it.
And he went on: “Cheney was behind it. And so was Bennie Thompson and everybody on that committee. For what they did, honestly, they should go to jail.”
Turley did say that he considers “the J6 Committee to be not just a colossal failure but a missed opportunity for a bipartisan look at that tragic day.” And that is true. He also made it clear he supports the continued efforts of House committees to finish their own investigation of security failures that day as well as the records of the J6 Committee. We assume he’s referring to what is left of those records, if there’s anything left after all the deleting.
But Turley’s main point was that “these are ethical and political failings, not criminal violations,” as “politicians routinely distort facts on both sides of scandals, including Presidents Biden, Trump, and Obama.” It’s elections, he said, that remove such people from office, as the election in Wyoming got rid of Liz Cheney.
Sorry, that’s not good enough. As Turley acknowledged, “Cheney’s work on the committee was rife with false claims and the manipulation of evidence.” Yes, politicians make false claims all the time, but it’s that pesky “manipulation of evidence” that should not be let go.
Turley cited Article 1, Section 6, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which states that members of Congress “shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.”
What on earth does that have to do with prosecuting someone like Liz Cheney, who is not even in the House any longer, for what she did to hide evidence? Nobody is proposing arresting legislators on the floor of Congress or going and coming from sessions. And this isn’t just “speech or debate” we’re talking about, but active suppression of exculpatory evidence in violation of someone’s rights.
Turley said that “the omissions and unfairness of the process do not constitute crimes.” And when he acknowledges that over a hundred files were allegedly destroyed, and that this does appear to violate the House’s archiving rules, he says “this is not ordinarily a case for criminal prosecution.” Really?? Well, if it’s not, it should be.
He says that “these rules have sufficient room for interpretation to make any such claim difficult to prosecute.” If the committee can just destroy evidence willy-nilly, then there’s something wrong with the rules. Do they not have to follow the LAW about destroying evidence, or do laws not apply to them? We guess we’ll find out.
“Clearly, a false statement to federal investigators or an effort to obstruct an investigation can be separate criminal violations,” Turley wrote, “but there is no indication of such allegations.” There isn’t?? This seems, on its face, to be obstruction of justice.
Turley thinks Trump needs to stop “fueling divisions.” (This is like punching someone 20 times, then the second he finally punches back, saying, “You need to stop this violence.”) He’s right about the damage caused by “rage rhetoric,” but he might be mistaken in arguing that Trump’s statement about J6 Committee members needing to go to jail is giving his critics a political windfall. It might be just the opposite, so why not see how this plays out? If anyone deserves to speak with a little rage after all that has been done to him, it’s President Trump.
https://jonathanturley.org/2024/12/09/no-the-j6-committee-should-not-go-to-jail/
Perhaps Turley’s column was written before Liz Cheney issued a threat to the DOJ on Monday that any move to investigate the now-defunct J6 Committee would be “sanctionable conduct.” Really?? Sanctionable...by whom? Not by her, as she’s not even in Congress any longer, haha. She seems to have mistaken being a former Congress member for being the current Queen of the Universe.
Cheney was triggered by Trump’s statements to rant that he had committed the “worst breach of our Constitution by any President in our nation’s history.” She said he had “attempted to overturn the 2020 presidential election and seize power.” (Really??) “He mobilized an angry mob and sent them to the United States Capitol…” (Again, really??)
Cheney said, “Donald Trump’s suggestion that members of Congress who later investigated his illegal and unconstitutional actions should be jailed is a continuation of his assault on the rule of law and the foundations of our republic.”
As Bonchie at REDSTATE comments, “There has STILL never been any evidence presented that Donald Trump intended for anyone to physically attack the Capitol building...Trump did not try to ‘seize power,’ and it has been proven that he requested National Guard troops to be present but was rebuffed.”
It was Cheney herself, along with fellow committee members, who buried the evidence of that.
But when faced with evidence of this, Cheney pulled the same aggressive tactics as the Biden family attorneys are doing. (Notice how they all respond like cornered badgers.) “There is no conceivably appropriate factual or constitutional basis,” she said, “for what Donald Trump is suggesting --- a Justice Department investigation of the work of a congressional committee --- and any lawyer who attempts to pursue that course would quickly find themselves engaged in sanctionable conduct.”
SANCTIONABLE CONDUCT? Again, sanctionable by whom?
The GOP-led Congress would be unlikely to do that, even if they had the authority. Perhaps she means the legal establishment, the state bar associations, as they’ve already acted quite inappropriately to intimidate attorneys who dare to represent President Trump. Recall “Project 65,” which was organized to do exactly the same thing. If that’s what she’s talking about, we predict such tactics will backfire big-time.
Bonchie sounds like us when he calls her threats “toothless.” As he says, “the Trump DOJ SHOULD investigate what happened with the January 6th Committee. It should find out how much evidence was altered and destroyed in what was a clear abuse of power and a waste of taxpayer money. That’s what people voted for in November. They didn’t vote for the status quo. They voted for change and accountability.”
And that’s why we non-lawyers have to disagree with Turley on how the J6 Committee misdeeds should be handled. To just let this go is not going to bring the country together, as it will only reinforce the perception (and reality) that Democrat wrongdoers get to skate. Maybe the worst committee members will go to jail and maybe they won’t, but if some do, it will be because they really, really deserve it.
Here’s more on the same subject from BREITBART. Wendell Husebo points out that when Trump was asked on “Meet the Press” if he’d actually direct his FBI director and attorney general to send them (Cheney and friends) to jail, he said, “Not at all. I think that they’ll have to look at that...they can do whatever they want.” (Perhaps Jonathan Turley didn’t hear that part.)
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/12/09/liz-cheney-accused-destroying-117-january-6-files-says-she-should-not-go-jail/
RELATED READING: Never mind Trump’s promised pardons of J6 political prisoners; Biden’s DOJ continues throwing people into jail after almost four years. If anything, they’ve accelerated the process. Biden-appointed and soon-to-be-fired (yay!) DC U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves has announced the arrest of at least ten J6 protesters since Election Day (!) and says there is “public interest in the prompt and efficient administration of justice.” He plans to make the most of his last few weeks in his job.
DC judges seem to be using Trump’s upcoming inaugural as a reason to push hard these next several weeks. They’re denying defendants’ requests to postpone sentencing in anticipation of a Trump pardon, and three J6 jury trials are set to begin this week. As Julie Kelly reports, “Judge Amy Berman Jackson recently entered an order allowing prosecutors in her extremely biased courtroom to describe January 6 to jurors as an ‘attack on the Capitol,’ ‘attack on Congress,’ and a ‘riot.’” How are these defendants supposed to get a fair trial?
If you want to know what’s currently going on in DC courts concerning these cases, Kelly’s piece is a must-read.
Law professor and Instapundit blogmaster Glenn Reynolds commented on this article, “Something needs to be done about D.C.’s impossibly partisan legal system. Personally, I’m in favor of abolishing ‘home rule’ for DC. Our nation’s capital should be ruled by the nation, not by the apparatchiks who live there.”
https://instapundit.com/689240/
MORE RELATED READING: Don’t miss this piece by Richard Truesdell and Keith Lehmann at AMERICAN GREATNESS, which spares no words about who the real criminal is in the Hunter scandal. Um, that would be his father.
https://amgreatness.com/2024/12/09/the-real-criminal-here-is-not-hunter-biden
ALSO RELATED: Former Democrat (but still liberal) Ana Kasparian gets that there’s something fishy about Hunter Biden’s “blanket” pardon covering 11 years. She even did the math and figured out that it had to go back that far to cover Hunter’s so-called work on the Burisma board. Gosh, now she’s actually getting suspicious that Hunter might have done something wrong! You know, even puppies open their eyes after no more than two weeks.
My Interview with VINIA CEO ILAN SOBEL & DR EDDIE MARISTANY
December 10, 2024
Brooke Goldstein, Founder of the Lawfare Project
December 10, 2024
After Hunter pardon, Biden and “allies” circle the wagons
December 9, 2024
Now that the Biden Family Protector-in-Chief has pardoned his son Hunter for any and all crimes he may have committed over a period of 11 years, the Biden family and their friends and allies (and their attorneys, of course) are reportedly assuming a highly aggressive stance against any criticism.
The WASHINGTON POST ran a story on their “very public plan,” as described by Jonathan Turley, to target potential witnesses --- and even media, such as FOX NEWS --- concerning allegations of Biden family influence-peddling. To oh-so-subtly warn witnesses that they might face retribution, the Biden team, predictably, leaked news of a recent strategy meeting in California to their helpful scribes at WAPO. The paper even named specific witnesses they’d be targeting. This means you, John Paul Mac Isaac and Tony Bobulinski!
And guess who the host for this meeting was. Why, it was Hunter’s “sugar brother” Kevin Morris, whose name, thanks to Hunter’s pardon, is now back in the news (for this story and also another, which we’ll get to). Recall that Morris seemingly came out of nowhere when Joe was running for President, turning up at a Democrat fundraiser to befriend Hunter, pay his reported $20,000/month rent and other lavish expenses, retire his estimated $2.8 million IRS debt, pay out the wazoo for his trash art, and even produce a movie based on his sorry exploits as the son of a powerful politician. (Note: this documentary is reportedly complete; Biden is said to have previewed it as part of his post-pardon celebration.)
As a result of Morris’ amazing generosity and Joe’s all-inclusive pardon, Hunter will face no consequences, financial or criminal, for his actions during those 11 key years.
In Turley’s words, “Morris’ plan could easily be taken as a declaration of all-out war on potential witnesses against Hunter Biden,” particularly Bobulinski and Mac Isaac. “What’s most interesting about the [WAPO] piece is why the WASHINGTON POST was given such access and such a detailed account. But someone wanted this campaign to be public before the House can call any witnesses.”
Recall that Bobulinski was the business partner who managed foreign business deals and directly contradicted Joe Biden’s claim, which we now know was untrue, that he knew nothing about them. (If memory serves, he’s the one who first identified Joe Biden as “the Big Guy.”) He went public soon after Miranda Devine’s laptop story broke in the NEW YORK POST --- as in, before Election Day 2020 --- with an interview about this, but most media simply ignored him. Now, however, Bobulinksi’s testimony could provide a serious threat to Joe Biden in the coming House investigation in confirming the President’s knowledge and even his possible receipt of funds from the family’s deals.
Turley describes this move against Bobulinski as being “about as subtle as a two-by-four to the head.” To leak details of this meeting, Biden’s team chose a paper that is one of THE most pro-Biden newspapers in the country (even now, apparently). They only recently gave up on the “Russian disinformation” hoax and admitted that Hunter’s laptop was the real deal.
Of course, to create a wall of separation between this meeting and the White House (which is still, sadly and unbelievably, occupied by Joe Biden, even if he’s just sleeping there), WAPO’s article stresses that the effort behind it is “operating separately from the White House.” Sure, right, nudge-nudge, wink-wink. David Brock, the Media Matters founder described by Turley as “one of the most controversial and reviled Democratic operatives in Washington” and “the lowest common denominator” even of that crowd, said his organization is “following its own strategy,” not coordinating with the Hunter Biden team.
Brock has a new group, ironically called “Facts First USA,” which he himself has described as a “SWAT team” designed to “ensure that the media and public do not accept the false narrative that flows from congressional investigations.” I think we have a pretty good idea of where the false narrative will be originating.
Other groups joining forces to protect the Bidens from those evil (truth-seeking) Republicans include the “Congressional Integrity Project” (hahahahaha!!) which according to Turley plans to attack President Trump’s family. The CIP recently hired Jeff Peck, who goes way back with Joe Biden, having served as his chief of staff when Biden was a U.S. Senator pilfering classified documents from secure viewing locations.
As hard as this article tries to establish a wall of separation between these neutralizing efforts and the White House/DNC, the involvement of Biden’s own staff and allies certainly blurs the line. As Turley points out, “Targeting witnesses like Bobulinski could invite congressional investigators to look more closely at these groups and their funding.” (Let it be.) They also need to watch out in case benefactor Morris is called as a witness. But they’re being so publicly aggressive about this, they don’t seem to care.
Unless there’s something we don’t know about the ring of protection around Morris, he’s taking a real risk here. It occurs to us that Morris might be one of those who’d like a blanket pardon from Biden before he leaves office, but if Biden gives him one, Morris won’t be able to plead the Fifth before congressional committees and will be required to answer all questions truthfully or face charges of perjury. (Note: Hunter will, too.)
The Democrats are taking a similarly aggressive stance against Trump’s Cabinet nominees, particularly Kash Patel as FBI director. This is a quick must-read from Victor Davis Hanson…
https://instapundit.com/689032/
RELATED: Chris Swecker, former FBI assistant director, appeared with Maria Bartiromo last Tuesday, saying this: “I know a broad criminal conspiracy when I see one, and the Bidens operated like a crime family --- lots of money moving through the international system, shell corporations, non-services, and family members were involved...So, yes, there’s a lot to protect here, and I expect to see more pardons.”
Be sure to see Maria’s interview with Miranda Devine on Sunday about “pre-emptive pardons” for the likes of Adam Schiff (who, thanks to Gavin Newsom, is joining the Senate today, two months earlier than we expected him to be inflicted on the Senate), Liz Cheney, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Lt. Gen. Mark Milley (who made secret phone calls to China during Trump’s first term in office). Devine expects Joe’s brother Jim to be on the priority list for a pardon, as he “was involved in a lot of the China grift with Hunter Biden.” Jim’s wife apparently signed checks to Joe Biden totaling $200,000 --- which happened to work out as 10 percent for “the Big Guy” --- adding the notation “loan repayment.”
Side note: Interesting comments here from Devine about Liz Cheney and her “untoward behavior” as co-chair of the House J6 Committee, concerning alleged collusion with witness Cassidy Hutchinson.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6365723982112
ALSO RELATED: We might not take this seriously if it came from anyone less esteemed than Victor Davis Hanson, but he suggested on Friday that First Son Hunter Biden was blackmailing his father as leverage for a presidential pardon. Hanson thinks Hunter resents having to do the “dirty work” for the family and probably threatened to testify against them.
AND THIS: Victoria Taft at PJ MEDIA wonders if Hunter Biden was being used by the CIA, which perhaps served as “the root of the poisonous tree of free-flowing money by a connected Hollywood attorney who had just barely befriended the out-of-control addict at a Joe Biden for President event in LA when he started cutting checks.” She makes a good case in this must-read piece.
https://pjmedia.com/victoria-taft/2024/12/04/cia-and-hunter-n4934793
ALSO, THIS: Mark Levin’s Sunday night monologue makes it very clear that the Bidens and their protectors in the so-called justice system have much to fear after all they’ve done. Imagine if it were Trump handing out blanket “pre-emptive pardons.”
https://www.foxnews.com/shows/life-liberty-levin
Levin also interviews Jonathan Turley about his piece for THE HILL, “Pardon envy: Democrats vie to make the Biden pardon list.” Read it here…
……...
And now to what we’ll call Hunter Biden Story #2, which you’ll see as it unfolds has a double meaning. Major sarcasm alert here...
In a story that surely no one, even the most cunning and worldly art investors, could have foreseen, the market for Hunter Biden’s stunningly beautiful and emotionally moving artwork has apparently collapsed. Gee, we’re not sure why, because the work of this artistic genius and son of an esteemed President has been universally acclaimed by experts and wildly praised by the public, but we do have a suspicion it might have something to do with the end of President Biden’s political career and the loss of his influence in DC. Surely that’s not it, though, because then we’d have to become cynical about the world of art investing, which of course is as honest and upright as any other network of financial transaction --- especially any such network involving the Biden family, which we’ve repeatedly been told by Democrats is above board in every way, and that’s good enough for us.
Some critics, who obviously knew nothing about fine art, said from the start that the sale of Hunter’s paintings was really just a cover for President Biden’s political allies to funnel money to him and his family. But it only looked that way because the main investors happened to be Hunter’s benefactor Kevin Morris and Democrat donor Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali. Can Hunter help it if wealthy Democrat donors have more sophisticated taste in art than other people?
And recall that there was a stringent arrangement in place to prevent Hunter from ever learning the identities of his art buyers. There was simply no way he could possibly have known who bought his paintings. Never mind that the gallery owner who was selling Hunter’s art did say Hunter knew who purchased the paintings that accounted for roughly 70 percent of his earnings, which according to congressional testimony totaled about $1.5 million.
Before Hunter attained such huge financial success as an artiste, he was already deep into this study. Apparently, he was practicing his painting before he could even afford PAINT. According to one story from a former landlord, when Hunter couldn’t afford to pay off his year of back rent, he scrounged up a spiral notebook and used his own, well, bodily excrement (sorry, but that’s why we had to call this “Story #2”) to create fine works of art with which to fulfill his financial obligation.
This was in 2019. Instead of remaining eternally grateful --- surely any work from Hunter would someday be worth millions --- this landlord, Shaun Maguire, has now gone public with the story. When Hunter’s attorneys denied it, he published photos of the “art” on social media. Yes, we looked; you REALLY, REALLY might not want to. But in case you really want to see a particularly grotesque (alleged) example of Hunter’s brilliance, here’s the link.
https://x.com/shaunmmaguire/status/1865080086657142859
For a while, the Hunter team was threatening to sue those who discussed the Biden/Morris scandal. Jonathan Turley was among those targeted, but he continued to write about it and was never sued. We can’t verify Maguire’s story, but, as Turley points out, he “must have known about the litigious reputation of the Biden team when he decided to go public with this claim.”
We would point out that the veracity of this story could always be confirmed through DNA testing, if it came to that. Perhaps this is why there has been no inclination so far for the Biden legal team to make good on their threat.
Mike's Monologue: THAT is MY President!
December 9, 2024
Trump doesn't need Biden's help with legal troubles: Mike Huckabee
December 4, 2024
Just a few days ago, NATIONAL REVIEW ran an unfortunate column by legal analyst Andrew C. McCarthy advising the new Trump 47 administration against using “retributive” lawfare against those who spent years abusing the legal system and violating his rights to damage him politically. (We linked to his piece, and then to the Julie Kelly commentary that magnificently dismantled it). But yesterday, NR redeemed itself by posting a related story from James Lynch that shows just how far the FBI went to interfere with the 2020 election by suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story. We’re not attorneys, but if McCarthy believes these people should be given the kid-glove treatment now, he is just wrong. They all need the book thrown at them.
As Lynch tells it, we know now that the FBI spent “the better part of a year” working with social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook to censor the Hunter laptop story as “Russian disinformation,” withholding information from them that would have told them the laptop was authentic. As you know, the FBI had been aware of its authenticity ever since they took possession of it in November 2019. According to FBI whistleblower Gary Shapley, they authenticated its content soon after, obtaining a warrant and retrieving the data from the laptop’s archive.
But they worked harder on misleading social media than we’d even known. This is the stunning new part, from NR’s story on a bombshell House Judiciary Committee report:
“After authenticating the device, the FBI team on the Hunter Biden (case) briefed the bureau’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) multiple times because of the case’s connection to Ukraine. Months before the laptop story broke, the FITF was aware that the FBI possessed Biden’s laptop, multiple FITF officials testified to the Judiciary Committee, according to the report.”
Many months ago, we reported on the media workshop held before the 2020 election by our intel community for media and social media platforms at the Alpine Institute. But as Lynch says, the Judiciary investigation found this was just part of the government’s influence, as the FITF met with them over 30 times (!), beginning in early 2020, to “pre-bunk” allegations that the Biden family had peddled influence to profit from the Biden name.
The FBI declined to comment for NATIONAL REVIEW. Wouldn’t you know.
According to the report, the FITF gave social media a heads-up about potential “hack-and-leak” operations, in the context of election security and potential foreign influence operations. In effect, they primed them to accept that the Hunter laptop story, when it came out, would be fake.
“In response,” the report reads, “some platforms even adopted new content moderation policies designed to address hacked materials.” FBI officials were popping champagne corks.
According to the Judiciary report, the warnings got quite specific, with the FBI warning “multiple times that a ‘hack-and-leak’ story involving Burisma and Hunter Biden was set to drop in October 2020,” Lynch writes.
To cite just one example of how social media staffers interpreted this, one from Facebook “predicted” in September 2020 that “We are likely to have in the next few weeks a leak or series of leaks about Biden’s supposed link to Burisma, where we won’t be able to prove they were ‘hacked,’ but where we will have responsible USG [U.S. government] players publicly saying this is part of a foreign influence operation.”
So when Miranda Devine came out with her NEW YORK POST story about the laptop, what were FB and Twitter employees supposed to think of it? They thought just what the administration wanted them to think, as they’d already been vaccinated against the truth. Just in case, the FITF had even scheduled meetings with both Facebook and Twitter on October 14, the day Devine’s story broke.
(We would add that the FBI surely had been spying on both Devine and her source Rudy Giuliani. How else would they have known the exclusive story was going to break?)
Most of the rest of this, you already know. As the report reads, “The FBI refused to acknowledge that it possessed and had authenticated the laptop.” It was a big con, which later allowed then-candidate Joe Biden to further con American voters when he denied the laptop was real. (Of course, the fake “classic earmarks” letter signed by 51 former intel officials also helped him carry off his lie.)
Interestingly, while FB and Twitter reflexively cracked down on the laptop story, Google left it alone, as their own in-house threat analysis found no evidence the laptop was the product of a hack. Can’t believe we’re saying this, but Google actually deserves a little credit here.
Still, this report from the Judiciary Committee offers even more on the extent to which the FBI tried to interfere in the 2020 election by suppressing real news. Later on, after Elon Musk bought Twitter and turned it into “X,” he fired the two executives responsible for censoring the Hunter laptop story. As reported by NATIONAL REVIEW, Yoel Roth and Vijaya Gadde expressed remorse during testimony last year about their decision to suppress the NY POST’s reporting.
For when you have time, here’s the full report from the House Judiciary Committee on how the CIA was involved in discrediting the Hunter laptop story. As you know, former deputy CIA Director Mike Morell (who was still under contract to the CIA at the time) coordinated the “classic earmarks” letter.
The committee’s pithy conclusion: “The infamous Hunter Biden statement had all the hallmarks of an intelligence community influence operation.” How sad that an agency that is supposed to work against our adversaries on foreign soil was turned against American voters.
If the Hunter Biden laptop had been totally buried, we would’ve been none the wiser about the Biden family “business,” casting our ballots in blissful ignorance, just as the left wanted us to. Yes, Hunter’s dirty mess came out, but President Biden has made sure his son won’t have to pay, at the same time trying to minimize the damage to the rest of the family, including himself.
(Side note: To those urging Trump not to take any action against the Deep State spooks responsible for this, recall that polls showed that if voters had known the laptop was real, Biden would have lost the 2020 election by a wide margin. Therefore, they are directly responsible not only for election interference and all the damage caused by Biden-Harris, but for handing Biden the power to cover up the biggest influence peddling scandal in American history, plus any other crimes his son might have committed over an 11-year period. Still want to let all these accomplices off scot-free?)
On Day 1 of Biden’s presidency, spokesperson Jen Psaki promised his administration would “bring transparency and truth back to the administration.” Honestly, this makes us think Karine Jean-Pierre gets a bad rap, because that statement from Psaki is just as ludicrous as anything ever uttered by KJP. The DAILY CALLER’s Katelynn Richardson has a good report on what Protect the Public Trust has to say about this administration’s lack of transparency and disregard of its own ethical promises.
She gives example after example…
In more backlash from President Biden’s all-inclusive pardon of his son, California Judge Mark Scarsi joins Special Counsel David Weiss and Delaware U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika in less-than-heartfelt acceptance of this move. Like them, he simply “terminated” the case under his review without actually dismissing it.
This piece at REDSTATE is a must-read, as it includes Judge Scarsi’s scathing comments. Reading between the lines, he seems disgusted by the President’s complaints about Hunter being treated differently. The President might be granted the authority to issue a pardon, he says, but, “Nowhere does the Constitution give the President the authority to rewrite history.” That, and more, here…
The Hunter pardon has generated an avalanche of stories and opinions, so let’s run through a few...
John Nolte at BREITBART tells how the swampy media are trying to spin the real story. For example, the laughable NEW YORK TIMES tries to make you believe that Biden wasn’t lying; he just changed his mind. Nolte’s piece on this should be used in journalism classes, but it won’t be.
(Note: we see that more commentators are picking up on the fact that Hunter, now that he’s been pardoned, can no longer hide behind the Fifth Amendment.)
Joe Manchin has an idea about who Biden should pardon next, and it’s Donald Trump. Manchin says it would “balance the scales of justice.” That’s precisely why it won’t happen.
HOT AIR has more examples of leftists twisting their tiny brains into mini-pretzels trying to praise Biden for pardoning his son after praising him for NOT pardoning his son.
Okay, now let’s contrast the leniency shown to Hunter with the atrocious treatment of the January 6 protesters, most of whom did nothing more than walk peacefully (“parade”) through the Capitol building (or not even that).
Victims of the weaponized justice system are speaking out, as reported by Catherine Salgado at PJ MEDIA, who quotes our friend Brandon Straka of #WalkAway: “I’m still serving a sentence for standing outside the Capitol for eight minutes. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden could have murdered someone over the past decade, and nothing’s gonna happen.”
Here’s a compelling, must-read rationale for Trump pardoning ALL January 6 defendants, especially in light of the Hunter pardon. (Scott Adams, in his Tuesday podcast, happened to say this very thing. Perhaps he had read this.) We’re talking a blanket pardon for everyone, no matter what they allegedly did, because of the inherent political bias of the prosecutions. Defendants simply could not get a fair trial when they were labeled “domestic terrorists,” “Insurrectionists” and “enemies of the state.” Much more, some of it hilarious, at REDSTATE…
RELATED: Speaking of the weaponized “justice” system, let’s get in our Way-Back Machine and take a quick look at Trump’s first sham impeachment. It’s just been found that a ‘journalistic entity” called the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP, formed in 2008), which helped shape the impeachment narrative against President Trump, is primarily funded by...drum roll, please!...U.S. government agencies.
Though we had never heard of it, this is apparently an extremely influential group, operating in over 60 countries and employing over 200 reporters. They partner with the WASHINGTON POST, THE NEW YORK TIMES and THE GUARDIAN. The head of the OCCRP says the government never exerted editorial control, but they did “veto top personnel hires, including editorial hires.” (Why, that would NEVER affect editorial content!) This report is an eye-opener.
ALSO RELATED: If you know anyone who thinks Kash Patel is somehow wrong for the job of FBI director, please tell them to listen to John Solomon’s interview with retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent Jeff Danik, in which Danik enthusiastically endorses Patel and explains why.
Joe Biden pardons Hunter Biden
December 3, 2024
Mike Huckabee
Throughout President Biden’s term, we’ve had so many stories that we deemed “shocking but not surprising” that it became a regular category of news stories. And on Sunday night, at the end of a long holiday weekend when most people were in tryptophan comas, Biden dropped the mother of all “shocking but not surprising” stories: he gave his prodigal son Hunter a full pardon. Not just for everything we know he did, but for everything we might find out that he did over an 11-year period (the mind reels at that thought!) It’s not just a presidential pardon, it’s a “Get Out Of Jail Free” platinum card.
https://www.westernjournal.com/breaking-joe-biden-pardons-son-hunter/
The reaction from Republicans was also unsurprising, with Congressional leaders denouncing it as another example of two-tiered justice from the most lawless Administration in history.
But the pardon is no surprise, despite the fact that Biden repeatedly swore he would not interfere with the justice system or the jury verdict by pardoning his son. Recall, he also swore he would return normality to politics, he wouldn’t raise taxes on anyone earning over $200,000 a year, he knew nothing about Hunter’s shady deals and never met with his clients, and that Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation. So why would anyone believe him when he said he wouldn’t pardon Hunter? We can’t wait to hear Karine Jean-Pierre channel Gene Wilder in “Young Frankenstein”: “Don’t you people know a JOKE when you hear one?!”
Of course, with Joe having been found officially too old and feeble to be prosecuted (although not too old and feeble to continue to be President), this means both Hunter and Joe will be safe from any legal consequences for their (alleged!) long-running family influence-peddling racket. This makes it the most successful high-level corruption ring in American history.
Of course, there are other Biden family members who allegedly benefited, but Biden could always pardon them, too, before leaving office. Some are questioning why he chose to do this now instead of at the last minute. Hunter was scheduled to be sentenced in a few weeks, but chances are he wouldn’t have seen the inside of a jail cell before Trump’s inauguration.
Pardoning Hunter now distracts media attention from the Democrats’ manufactured “OUTRAGE!” over Trump’s Cabinet picks and reminds Americans of the powerful stench of Democrat corruption, which only helps Trump and his message of cleaning up the DC swamp (maybe we should call it a sewer.) Perhaps Biden did it as revenge for being thrown overboard by his Party, like his endorsement of Kamala Harris. It also sucks the air out of the Democrats’ bloviating about Trump pardoning January 6th political prisoners.
Perhaps even better for Trump, in making the sweeping pardon, Biden released a stunningly dishonest statement, claiming poor little Hunter was unfairly targeted by the DOJ for political reasons. In truth, they tried to give him an unprecedented sweetheart deal that was only stopped because the judge read it and was appalled. According to Joe, virtually nobody is actually punished for tax evasion or lying about being a drug addict on gun purchase forms. Really? You try that (WARNING! We’re speaking rhetorically: Do NOT try that!) It is nice of him to admit, though, that not even Democrats take the gun laws they force on us seriously.
Only after Hunter’s crimes became such a hot potato that they were impossible to cover up was the DOJ forced to do its job (which, coincidentally, gave them justification for claiming they were “nonpartisan” as they waged lawfare on Trump and his supporters.)
But in making that self-serving claim that really isn’t true for Hunter, Joe verified that his DOJ is corrupt and unfairly prosecutes people for political reasons. That gives Trump all the ammunition he needs to pardon his supporters who’ve been targeted and to clean out their partisan rats’ nests. Trump made that clear with his reaction to the news on social media:
“Does the pardon given by Joe to Hunter include the J6 hostages, who have now been imprisoned for years? Such an abuse and miscarriage of Justice!”
This anti-climax is frustrating for anyone who cares about justice, since all we can ever hope is that some real journalists (i.e., conservative journalists) will eventually put together the full story of this sleazy scheme and make it all public. It’s a twisted and wide-ranging web of corruption. Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene wrote an X post reminding us of all the corrupt members of the “justice” system who turned a blind eye or actively worked to cover it up, and of the fact that the FBI raided Barron Trump’s bedroom but not Hunter Biden’s.
https://thelibertydaily.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-breaks-down-hunter-pardon-warns/
Law professor Jonathan Turley also blasted the pardon, calling it “disgraceful” and “a decision that lives in infamy in presidential politics.” He eviscerated Biden’s rationale for the pardon and said that after all his denials that he would ever do it, this cements his legacy as the “liar-in-chief.”
On Saturday, President-elect Trump confirmed it: his choice for the new FBI director is none other than the brilliant and eminently qualified Kash Patel, who has made it clear that he would work to dismantle the bureaucracy, saying, “I’d shut down the Hoover FBI Building on Day 1 and reopen it as a museum of the Deep State.”
https://x.com/TrumpDailyPosts/status/1863007459788628379
Of course, this also confirms that current Director Christopher Wray is being given the boot. There’s no need at this point to expound on why that resounding kick out the door and down the steps is so richly deserved on his part.
(To those without a clue who’ve actually said, “But Wray is a Republican who was appointed by Trump,” we’d simply reply that he’s made it clear through his actions and his total lack of transparency that he’s a “Republican” only in the sense that Liz Cheney or his own predecessor James Comey is one. Keep in mind, Wray got that job because he was recommended to DC-neophyte President Trump by Chris Christie, who should forever hang his head in shame for such a lousy suggestion. As time passed and Biden took the White House, Wray just happened to fit right in with the Biden administration’s goals, fulfilling Attorney General Merrick Garland’s dictums as diligently and opaquely as any Democrat might have done.)
If you’d like a refresher on Wray, here’s a scathing reminder from Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, who’s in line to chair the Senate Judiciary Committee in the next Senate term, to our good fortune...
But enough about Wray. Does someone as perfect for the job as Patel have any hope of actually being confirmed by the new Senate? Texas Sen. Ted Cruz predicts he will be, along with Trump’s other nominees. He quickly runs through Patel’s outstanding qualifications.
“I gotta say,” Cruz continues, “all of the weeping and gnashing of teeth, all of the people pulling their hair out, are exactly the people who are dismayed about having a real reformer come into the FBI and clean out the corrupted partisans who sadly have burrowed into senior career positions at the FBI.”
The clip is just a little over a minute long. News analysts at CBS’s FACE THE NATION must have loved hearing this from Sen. Cruz...
Tennessee Sen. Bill Hagerty concurs that Patel “represents the type of change that we need to see in the FBI.” Here he is on NBC’s MEET THE PRESS, whose host was probably every bit as thrilled to hear this as the folks at CBS were, meaning not. (Read her solemn expression at the end to see how she likely felt.) Mainstream “journalists” must be profoundly dismayed at the prospect of losing their leaky FBI “anonymous sources.” Again, just a brief, must-see clip...
Kash Patel is SO highly qualified for the job of FBI director that anyone who criticizes him on this score is really saying, in the words of commentator J. D. Rucker, “Holy c**p! Kash Patel’s gonna catch us all!”
Rucker also posted in more detail on X that this is why they’re going to come after him “with all they’ve got.” It’s a must-read. Surely both President Trump and Patel himself are aware of what’s ahead for the confirmation process. Those desperate enough, with enough to lose, will try anything and everything, just as they have with President Trump. (Oh, no, are we all going to be subjected again to the Democrats “trotting out the women”?)
https://x.com/JDRucker/status/1863247098969546850
Patel’s name had previously been floated as the possible nominee for DEPUTY director, which doesn’t require Senate confirmation. But Trump apparently is feeling confident that Patel will get through, as he should. Pam Bondi, as U.S. Attorney General, will be his boss.
https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/30/donald-trump-kash-patel-fbi-director/
We hope that together, Bondi and Patel can rid the “justice” system of politicized actions such as this…
At this point, you’ve seen plenty from Patel’s stellar resume. But some are noting that former Attorney General Bill Barr said this about Patel in his 2022 book:
“I categorically opposed making Patel deputy FBI director. I told Mark Meadows it would happen ‘over my dead body.’ In the first place, all the leadership positions in the bureau, except the director, have always been FBI agents. They've all gone through the same agent training and have had broad experience in the field and at headquarters. Someone with no background as an agent would never be able to command the respect necessary to run the day-to-day operations of the bureau. Furthermore, Patel had virtually no experience that would qualify him to serve at the highest level of the world’s preeminent law enforcement agency.”
Bonchie at REDSTATE wryly comments: “I can’t think of a better endorsement for Patel to serve as FBI director than that.”
He also notes David Frum’s post on X: “We are headed toward a US constitutional crisis vastly bigger than Watergate.” (What, by appointing people who are not career bureaucrats? Seems as though that would make the framers of the Constitution very happy!) As Bonchie points out, “No, we are not heading for a ‘constitutional crisis,’ because the FBI is not a constitutional agency. It is a bloated, corrupt bureaucracy under the direct leadership of the President and one in desperate need of a house cleaning.” Thomas Jefferson, in his day, would likely have been so fed up that he’d call for much more drastic action than what Trump is taking, which is simply to follow the authority given him under the Constitution to make his own appointments, subject to Senate approval.
But, anyway, get ready for a lot more hysterical nonsense like that.
Here’s REDSTATE’s Nick Arama, commenting on the screams coming from former deputy FBI Director (and current MSNBC contributor) Andrew McCabe’s corner. Delightful to behold!
Becca Lower at REDSTATE points out two more whose jaws are sore from all the teeth-gnashing: former Trump National Security Advisor John Bolton and Biden National Security Advisor (and Russia hoaxer) Jake Sullivan. Be sure to read her piece for the quote from Sen. Hagerty about how Biden appointees such as Secretary of State Tony Blinken, who organized the now-infamous “classic earmarks” letter about Hunter Biden’s laptop, “qualified” for their jobs and security clearances
Susie Moore, also at REDSTATE, points out that while former top officials are having a fit, former FBI agents seem quite pleased and even ecstatic about Patel…
In more from REDSTATE, Streiff notes that Bolton actually compared Patel to Lavrenty Beria, a Stalin loyalist who became head of the secret police. According to Streiff at REDSTATE, Beria “carried out the purges of the 30s, ran the gulag system, and kept the Red Army in the field during the trying 1940-1942 period through the use of political commissars, blocking units and summary executions.” Streiff calls Bolton’s statement “mind-bogglingly stupid” and considers it to be quite a solid endorsement of Patel.
FBI agent-turned-whistleblower Steve Friend has some recommendations for the new FBI director. “Director Patel should immediately dissolve the FBI case quota system and Intelligence Branch,” he told PJ MEDIA’S Catherine Salgado. “These protocols have contributed to the bureau’s devolution into a politicized secret police force.”
In the “case quota system,” as explained by Friend, offices and agents are supposed to log a specific number of cases in specific categories, and their promotions rest in their ability to fulfill these. (Think January 6.) Did you even know they had this? On its face, this is a terrible system. It induces agents to create crimes that don’t even exist, and to ignore other types of crimes that aren’t at the top of the priority list, in order to reach arbitrary statistical goals. Patel should retire this system on Day 1.
Over the weekend (before the Patel nomination was announced), legal analyst Andrew C. McCarthy wrote an unfortunate piece for NATIONAL REVIEW called “Trump Needs to End Lawfare,” in which he lamented the thought of Trump using the legal system to go after what he admits were “bad prosecutions.” He found it disturbing that Trump would echo Steve Bannon’s “battle cry for lawfare.” Read it if you’d like…
https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/11/trump-needs-to-end-lawfare/
...but what really is a must-read is Julie Kelly’s response, in which she absolutely takes his argument apart. She’s THE preeminent January 6 expert, and her piece is so masterful, we’ll just give her the floor and encourage you to offer her your undivided attention.
Mexico and Canada react to Trump
December 3, 2024
Migrant rights activists are protesting that Mexican authorities have broken up two huge caravans of migrants who were crossing Mexico to enter the US illegally, after Trump threatened 25% tariffs on Mexico. Wait, you mean it’s possible for Mexico to STOP people from walking across their country to enter the US? Who knew?!
https://apnews.com/article/mexico-migrant-caravans-trump-tariffs-c4611c47fc53e2c494545a7cef194e88
And guess who else immediately came calling to talk to Trump about border security. If you guessed Canadian PM Justin Trudeau, you win a cigar.
As you can see from this hilariously snarky report from Scott Pinsker, Trudeau is facing Arctic headwinds in next year’s election, with 57% of Canadians wanting him off the ballot. This is good news for our Canadian cousins.
We’ve received objections from some Canadian readers that the real border security problem is with Mexico, not Canada, and they have a point. However, while there might not be as many entries from the north, it’s not something to be unconcerned about. The National Post of Canada reported Friday that according to US Customs and Border Security, 87% of people identified as “terror suspects” who tried to enter the US via a land border in 2024 came from Canada. The good news: they were stopped at the border. But these are the ones we know about.
Besides, strong border security would also be beneficial for Canada. It would keep them from being invaded by entire states’ worth of whiny leftist insurrectionists who want to secede…
…And while a wall across the entire Canadian border would be very expensive, think of how many Trump-hating Hollywood celebrities it might keep out. Money well spent!
Mike Huckabee
“My word as a Biden.”
Well, we know what that’s worth now. Of course, those of us who were paying attention have known for years that the word of Joe Biden was worth nothing. But now, with the inventive, all-encompassing presidential pardon of son Hunter, everyone can see the emptiness of his trademark phrase.
As with Hunter’s “sweetheart” plea deal that was negotiated with prosecutors before being questioned by the presiding judge, no one has ever seen a pardon like this. It covers any and all charges against Hunter that might arise from his activities during an 11-year time frame. This, after Biden had repeatedly claimed that he would not pardon Hunter, period.
But few are surprised Hunter was pardoned, and even they might be pretending to be surprised. President Trump said to FOX NEWS in October, “I’ll bet you the father probably pardons him. Let’s see what happens, but he’s a bad boy, there is no question about it.”
Still, Biden has lied countless times about this and about his family’s history of influence peddling. Karine Jean-Pierre has the thankless job of covering for him, but in lying to defend the indefensible, she just looks pathetic. This exchange took place Monday with the press on board Air Force One on its way to Angola (notice he’s far from the U.S. right now):
Reporter: “You and Biden said for months that he wouldn’t pardon Hunter...could those statements now be seen as lies [by] the American people?”
Karine Jean-Pierre: “One of the things that the President always believes is to be truthful to the American people. That is something he always truly believes.”
KJP’s biggest challenge these days must be getting through press briefings with a straight face.
Here’s the full story from the NEW YORK POST. Obviously, the focus-group-tested term of the day was “war politics,” which KJP repeated three times. It’s supposed to mean the politicization of the Justice Department, which she insists led to their persecution of...Hunter Biden. (Huh? We thought it was somebody else.) At the same time, President Biden is trying to maintain that, when it comes to Trump prosecutions, the DOJ is NOT politicized. It’s nonsensical.
She said that Biden had simply changed his mind over Thanksgiving. To their credit, some of the reporters actually pressed her on this. But, really, why do they even bother with these ridiculous press briefings at this point? Surely, they aren’t doing it for the free trip to...Angola. These briefings are nothing more than an exercise in hiding the truth, a waste of everybody’s time.
U.S. District Judge Maryellen Norieka, who first raised an eyebrow at that never-before-seen “sweetheart deal” put together by Hunter’s attorneys and U.S. Attorney David Weiss, said in a court filing on Monday that she’ll accept the President’s pardon related to the firearms charges and “intends to terminate the proceedings against Defendant.”
But David Weiss denied that Hunter had been “treated differently” and also that the verdict against him was a “miscarriage of justice,” words Karine Jean-Pierre had used. In a court filing, he said that “there was none and never has been any evidence of vindictive or selective prosecution in this case. To the extent that Defendant’s claim that he is being selectively prosecuted rests solely on him being the son of the sitting President, that claim is belied by the facts.” After all, they said, it’s the President’s own appointees who run the Justice Department.
Weiss can’t overturn a presidential pardon, of course, but in “terminating” the case, he’s expressing resistance to actually dismissing the indictment against Hunter. It’s an interesting distinction, and both he and Judge Norieka deserve credit for making it...
Recall that according to IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, it was just the opposite of a political prosecution, in that Hunter, as a member of the First Family, definitely got preferential treatment. As BREITBART reports, Shapley and Ziegler made at least 13 allegations against Hunter and his family in congressional testimony last year, saying that supervisor Lesley Wolf restricted their investigation, particularly when it threatened to include “the Big Guy.”
CNN reports that First Lady Jill Biden was strongly lobbying/pressuring for the pardon. But, really, they’re such fake news, who knows how it really went down? Here’s the story anyway; make of it what you will...
House Speaker Mike Johnson posted this on X: “President Biden has insisted many times he would not pardon his own son for his serious crimes. But last night, he suddenly granted a ‘Full and Unconditional Pardon’ for any and all offenses that Hunter committed for more than a decade! Trust in our justice system has been almost irreparably damaged by the Bidens and their use and abuse of it. Real reform cannot begin soon enough!”
https://x.com/SpeakerJohnson/
Indeed, this looks so bad that Democrats are joining the chorus of criticism. According to the NY POST, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis was the first Democrat to denounce the pardon. “This is a bad precedent that could be abused by later Presidents and will sadly tarnish his reputation,” Polis said of Biden, ignoring the fact that Biden’s reputation was already badly in need of some Tarn-X.
Arizona Rep. Greg Stanton said, “I respect President Biden [editorial aside: Why??], but I think he got this one wrong. This wasn’t a politically motivated prosecution. Hunter committed felonies, and was convicted by a jury of his peers.”
Mark Penn, a former adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton, called the pardon “disgraceful.” He actually summed it up in a way we might write about it for the newsletter: “This was not a pardon of just Hunter Biden but of Joe Biden himself as his son ran a scheme with Joe’s brother to shake down adversaries of over $20 million and then didn’t even pay taxes on it. And the loot was distributed even to grandchildren. And this is yet another of the many issues the American public was shamefully gaslighted over.” (Editor’s Note: Well, not ONE grandchild…)
That pretty much tells the story in a few sentences. Penn left out just a couple of things: 1) Joe Biden himself apparently was in the pipeline to receive “loot” from this scheme, and 2) Barack Obama, in naming Biden to be “point man” to Ukraine, surely had to know about the Biden family’s foreign “business” dealings.
Law professor Jonathan Turley, who used to be a Democrat, says that “President Biden has set a standard that is not merely a new low but positively subterraneous for future Presidents.”
“It is not just that the President used his constitutional powers to benefit his family,” Turley wrote in a column for FOX NEWS. “It is because the action culminates years of lying to the public about his knowledge and intentions in the influence-peddling scandal surrounding his family.”
Turley looked at the history of the power to pardon, acknowledging that it was “not a pristine power.” He noted that in 2023 he’d suggested that Biden might withdraw from the 2024 race and then, as a lame-duck President, use his power to pardon Hunter. “The pardon-and-apology approach,” he wrote at that time, “might appeal to Biden not only as an effort to convert vice into virtue but also to justify his withdrawal from the election as a selfless act.”
But Biden is by no means a selfless person. He lingered in office, repeatedly lying --- there’s plenty of evidence of this --- about his family’s business dealings, and insisted on running for a second term when it was obvious to anyone with open eyes that he was cognitively unfit.
“The pardon power was written in absolute terms,” Turley wrote, “and a President can even, in my view, pardon himself. [Editorial aside: that’s a preview of coming attractions.] However, what is constitutional is not necessarily ethical or right. This is one of the most disgraceful pardons even in the checkered history of presidential pardons.”
“The President has now pardoned Hunter for his convicted felonies and ANY CRIMES HE MAY HAVE COMMITTED [emphasis ours] from January 1, 2014, to December 1, 2024.
“It is all now being buried under a sweeping immunity deal and a pack of presidential lies.”
(For the record, presidential pardons normally go to people who have been convicted and served at least part of their sentences, not given as “Get Out Of Jail” free cards for any and all crimes someone might later be found to have committed.)
CNN senior analyst Elie Honig called this pardon “a historic act of political nepotism.”
https://www.breitbart.com/
On the other hand, some Democrats are so shameless that they want pedal-to-the-metal pardons for everyone now. One MSNBC commentator expressed the hope that President Biden would issue preemptive pardons for “Special Counsel” Jack Smith, all his staff, and DOJ attorneys. Not kidding.
Others in the media either ignored the story, as MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” did, or predictably played the sympathy card for the Biden family…
So, what ARE the alleged crimes, charged or not, that Hunter has been pardoned for (just the ones we know about)? Victoria Taft at PJ MEDIA runs through them (brace yourselves)…
https://pjmedia.com/victoria-
Follow-the-money expert Peter Schweizer is expecting Joe’s brother James Biden to be pardoned next…
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/
Scott Pinsker at PJ MEDIA makes a good point: that in offering this sweeping pardon to his son, President Biden might have inadvertently handed Trump the mandate he needs to reform the “justice” system.
This pardon, and the timing of it, was probably orchestrated by President Biden’s legal advisors and Hunter’s legal team. Such a broad pardon obviously had its purposes but at the same time might have been short-sighted. That’s because with Hunter now pardoned for anything he might have done for the past 11 years, he no longer has Fifth Amendment protection, as he can’t be prosecuted for anything during that time. If he’s called to testify under oath, as before a congressional committee next year, and he makes false statements, he can be prosecuted just like anyone else. And Pam Bondi’s DOJ, unlike Merrick Garland’s, might actually do it.
In all the back-and-forth about the pardon, we’ve hardly heard this mentioned.
Even this piece by FOX NEWS legal analyst Gregg Jarrett doesn’t get into it, but it still sums up the whole story very well. Recommended reading...
Mike Huckabee
Bipartisan Conversations with Ro Khanna
December 1, 2024
Some Cautionary Tales about Government Efficiency
December 1, 2024
Kenneth Allard
In the month since Donald Trump’s astonishing landslide, few initiatives have been more intriguing than his dramatic announcement that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy will open a new White House-level Office of Government Efficiency. Its probable targets include those hardy Beltway perennials of waste, fraud and abuse as well as cutting a federal bureaucracy grown like Topsy whenever its lordly denizens actually report to work. The canonical example: That Carter-era abomination known as the Department of Education, seen by the incoming administration as the protector of teachers’ unions and usurper-in-chief of parental responsibilities best reserved for the several states. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-details-emerge-about-the-department-of-government-efficiency-s-proposed-cuts-to-federal-workforces/
Although prickly Democrats have already promised resistance in Congress and the courts, Republicans seem to be on a roll, despite their paper-thin majorities as well as those other hardy Beltway perennials known as ‘elections.’ Now in my dotage, I can well remember similar circumstances when in July 1985 President Reagan empaneled a blue-ribbon commission headed by David Packard, founder and Chairman of Hewlett-Packard. As an industrialist and public servant, Packard was a most formidable man. So too were the objectives of his reforms: The overall organization and management of the nation’s defense establishment, particularly its development and procurement of weapons systems.
Re-reading his final report nearly forty years later is enough to make is enough to make anyone cry, because those words still resonate: “DOD must displace systems and structures that measure quality by regulatory compliance and solve problems by executive fiat. Excellence in defense management cannot be achieved by the numerous management layers, large staffs and countless regulations in place today.” https://dair.nps.edu/bitstream/123456789/3705/1/SEC809-RL-86-0106.pdf
However imperfect, the Packard Commission provided a continuing blueprint for reform. It spurred landmark changes, particularly the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986, that elevated improved armed forces teamwork to our highest defense priority. Just four years later, Saddam Hussein provided that milestone legislation with the ultimate readiness test of high-intensity joint combat. By then, General Norman Schwarzkopf had reduced its complexities to a wonderfully succinct directive: “You get off that plane and you’re working for me!”
After working for Congressman Nichols as an Army Congressional Fellow, a series of bizarre happenstances placed me several years later astride one of the Packard Commission’s principle remaining goals: Reforming the laws affecting defense acquisition. And what an odd fate: I was not a lawyer, knew nothing about weapons acquisition and seemingly had nothing in common with its practitioners. But my experience with Pentagon reform had left me with many useful object lessons in “the art of the possible”- some of which might interest Messrs Musk and Ramaswami.
The first was recognizing that the operational environment surrounding defense procurement was a series of mutually suspicious and well-armed encampments – not unlike the warring factions I later encountered in Bosnia. Bring up any issue, no matter how benign it might seem on the surface, and you should proceed only after doing your homework to determine the most realistic limits of the possible; otherwise, just like with Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks, you were likely to emerge only after a long and pointless discussion of lineage, parentage and the egregious failings of persons who may or may not have been present.
We also had to understand precisely where we were. Our charter asked us to analyze the laws affecting defense acquisition. Well, how many of those laws were there? It took some painstaking research but we eventually came up with the astounding total of 800 laws! What was even worse: Each one of those laws generated multiple enabling regulations, the usual ratio being 1:3. So our 800 procurement laws were magically responsible for procreating at least 2400 regulations, an endlessly expanding crowd of orphans every time Congress passed a new law! Where and how could it all end – and what could our advisory panel do about it?
It took a little over two years to answer those questions, putting in place a comprehensive structure to review those laws, analyze their impact and make a well-documented case for retention, amendment or repeal. We kept close contact with our armed camps by ensuring that our reviews and recommendations fully considered their opinions – pro or con. Although often tempted to conclude that this was merely a fool’s errand, I was very pleasantly surprised when newly-inaugurated President Bill Clinton made our report the basis for his “reinventing government” initiatives.
So the good news is that these reforms eventually transformed all of federal procurement: The bad news is that, thirty years later, we need to do it all over again! Either way: Good luck, Elon and Vivek!
COL (Ret) Ken Allard is a former West Point professor, Dean of the National War College and NBC News military analyst.
My Weekend Monologue
December 1, 2024
Israel, Antisemitism, and Unity | Huckabee Today
November 30, 2024
Mike Huckabee: Hamas must be rooted out
November 30, 2024
Justice, Politics, and Trump
November 28, 2024
It’s STILL the Economy, Stupid
November 27, 2024
In “Justice” Department news, so much to be thankful for this week!
November 26, 2024
On Monday, just as our newsletter staff was preparing to take the occasional pause that refreshes, we had one of the best news days we could’ve hoped for since Election 2024. Talk about ending this short work week on a high note! There’s a lot to be thankful for this Thanksgiving.
First and perhaps most important, as reported by the POST MILLENNIAL, President-elect Trump is “set to nominate Kash Patel to a top role in the FBI or the Department of Justice.” AXIOS, citing “top transition sources,” broke the news more tentatively, saying that “the President-elect is considering him to be deputy FBI director or a high-up investigative role in the DOJ.”
In case you’re not familiar with Patel’s extensive background, the PM report summarizes it well. Another top contender for the job of FBI director has reportedly been Missouri AG Andrew Bailey, another fabulous choice. As we recently reported in another piece of delightful news, Mike Rogers, whose name had been floated (by whom, we have to wonder?) as a prospective FBI director, is not and has never been up for consideration by Trump. One would imagine that once Trump heard Rogers had been given the thumbs-up by none other than disgraced former deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, now a contributor at MSNBC, that would have cemented his decision.
Regarding any appointment of Rogers to the FBI, Trump was quoted by senior Trump campaign adviser Dan Scavino as saying he had “never even given it a thought.”
So, why might Trump be thinking about Patel for deputy director and not the top spot? Perhaps it’s to keep him out of reach of senators who fear him and plan to refuse his confirmation. Patel is someone of whom it’s often said that he “knows where all the bodies are buried.”
But Mike Davis, who might have similar knowledge of the location of those (figurative?) bodies, says Patel would have no problem with Senate confirmation. After reading what some leftist hack wrote about him in his Wikipedia entry, we’re wondering if Andrew Bailey might actually have more trouble, with Dems and RINOs:
“During his tenure as attorney general,” it says, “Bailey has refused to release prisoners after overturned convictions, attempted unsuccessfully to restrict gender-affirming care, battled initiatives to restore access to abortion in Missouri, and staunchly defended former President Donald Trump over his legal problems.”
That was just the second paragraph, and the author was only getting started. Most of these seem like good reasons FOR Bailey’s appointment. We don’t know the details of those cases in which he allegedly resisted releasing prisoners but unfortunately cannot rely on the Wikipedia entry, which really is just a hit piece. (And, sorry, Wikipedia, after showing us this slanted piece of garbage presented as an “encyclopedia” entry, you do NOT get the small donation your fundraising pop-up screen solicited.)
As for Patel, either as director, deputy director or special investigator, he is a spectacular choice. Until Trump is sworn in and does what he will with current FBI Director Chris Wray (which should involve a man-size Hefty bag in anticipation of trash day), Wray is still there and behaving true to form. As we reported yesterday, agents just last week raided the home of another nonviolent J6 attendee, a cancer patient, and arrested him. January 20 can’t come too soon.
https://thepostmillennial.com/
Speaking of confirmation, it might surprise you to know that there’s nothing in the Constitution that requires FBI background checks for any White House appointees or even the President himself. J. D. Rucker makes the case that this FBI should NOT be doing background checks on Trump’s team.
The actual RULE is this: After someone is hired for the position, the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Administration, which is not involved with the FBI at all, does a security check before that person receives top-secret clearance. These professionals are looking for “threats,” Rucker says, while the FBI is looking for “dirt.” The goal of the FBI, as they have shown many times, is to subvert the Trump administration.
This would explain why so often a nominee is derailed --- or almost derailed --- when the opposition resorts to “trotting out the women,” as we like to call it. These alleged personal failings have nothing to do with national security. (Exception: when, as in the case of Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, the woman is a Chinese spy.)
Rucker notes that Tulsi Gabbard is really being “slammed hard” by political enemies with made-up stuff about her being a Russian agent. RFK Jr. and Pete Hegseth are in the crosshairs as well. Trump should stand firm, he says: “The moment he allows the Deep State to start weaving their tentacles into his appointees, that’s the moment when we’re going to start seeing the situations such as what we saw with Gen. Michael Flynn, who should have been in the last Trump administration.” It was VP Pence and the FBI who stopped that. Recall that thanks to the machinations of then-FBI Director James Comey, Flynn got to serve as Trump’s national security advisor for 11 whole days.
The Senate really can’t use FBI warnings about “national security” as pretext for rejecting nominees. Again, that’s because after confirmation, there’s another agency that verifies they’re good-to-go.
“If they tell you otherwise,” Rucker says, “they’re lying.” In support of that statement, we would add that one of the most vocal proponents of using the FBI for vetting has been confirmed liar California Rep. (now Senator-elect – thanks, California) Adam Schiff.
As Mollie Hemingway told FOX NEWS’ Laura Ingraham on Monday night, “The idea that these [at the FBI] are people who could in any way vet whether a candidate is good or not, that they would be trusted to do that, is just laughable.”
Likewise Mary Katharine Ham: “The idea that by getting elected by the popular vote and the Electoral College and then naming people to his Cabinet, he’s ‘dismantling’ the government [as another confirmed liar, New York Rep. Dan Goldman, has said] seems insane to me…The idea that the FBI should be trusted by a Trump transition team --- I cannot express how wild that is without using cuss words...”
The other big, happy piece of news we received Monday is that “Special Counsel” Jack Smith finally dropped the four remaining charges against Trump related to January 6. He had already dropped the charges against him in the Mar-A-Lago “classified documents” case.
Sadly for Trump’s two J6 co-defendants, Smith did not dismiss charges against them, as they don’t enjoy Trump’s presidential immunity as established by the Supreme Court this summer. And in Smith’s characteristic weasel fashion, he dismissed the case against Trump “without prejudice,” meaning he could actually pick it up again at some point, presumably when Trump is out of office in 2029. “This outcome is not based on the merits or strength of the case against the defendant,” he lied.
On the contrary, re-filing this ridiculous case should be met with extreme prejudice.
Julie Kelly has an enjoyable piece on what a graceless loser and pathetic failure Jack Smith is, outlining his history and noting that just this year, this “dirty Democratic operative” was rebuked by the Supreme Court “on three separate occasions.” She also gets her digs in at presiding Judge Tanya Chutkan, a partisan monster in a black robe.
Kelly strongly recommends an investigation into these cases, with criminal charges “where appropriate.” She sees plenty of evidence to support charges of conspiracy, especially in the J6 case, which “revealed collaboration between the National Archives, the DOJ and the Biden White House to concoct a documents case against Trump as early as spring of 2021.”
Continuing: “Court proceedings in Florida also disclosed examples of evidence tampering, destruction of evidence, and witness intimidation not to mention the selective nature of bringing a documents case against a former president for the first time in history while at the same time other public officials including Joe Biden and Mike Pence were found to have unlawfully kept classified files after leaving office.”
And then there’s the shameful Mar-A-Lago raid, which should be investigated as a likely set-up.
“If the DOJ had a Hall Of Shame,” Kelly writes, “it would be named after Jack Smith.”
https://www.declassified.live/
FOX NEWS legal analyst Gregg Jarrett had some good comments Monday night with Sean Hannity, especially about the role played by the media in furthering all this.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/
Here’s more from Jonathan Turley about what a loser Jack Smith is, one that history will not treat kindly. Not that Smith deserves kindness.
Here’s Turley’s full column on the January 6 case.
https://jonathanturley.org/
Aforementioned liar Adam Schiff “had a hissy,” as we say in the South, about Smith dropping the J6 charges against Trump. He blew up on X, and, yes, he actually used the line that “no one is above the law.” (So far, Schiff seems to be. For example, last we heard, claiming homes in two different states as one’s primary residence is called “fraud.”) Bonchie’s excellent piece on Schiff’s reaction doesn’t spare the January 6 “Select” Committee, either. How about “selecting” co-chairs Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson, among others, for a nice, big investigation? Not for vengeance, but to know the truth.
Finally, Victoria Taft at PJ MEDIA offers suggestions for how Trump can get “payback” against Jack Smith and “the lawfare mob.” Again, this isn’t about revenge, but rather punishment to the full extent of the law so there’s no repeat of the lawfare against Trump and anyone representing or supporting him. In her words, “this cancer has to be rooted out to stop its corruptive spread.” She’s right; it needs major surgery and chemo.
Taft lays out in bullet points the myriad abuses by “Lawfare Incorporated.” Of particular note is the 65 Project, which targets attorneys who dare to represent Trump. Alan Dershowitz, who himself has been targeted by this group, wants a thorough investigation of that, as well as a probe of the case in New York brought by Letitia James and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg.
But for now, it’s time for us to go and give thanks for all the great news. There is so much to be thankful for, this is bound to take us pretty much the rest of the week.
A breakneck pace
November 26, 2024
President-elect Trump is nominating officials to fill his Administration at a breakneck pace, with a flurry of new posts filled just since Friday. We don’t want to turn the newsletter into a long list of names and resumes, so we’ll first point you to this page from Fox News that provides an ongoing tally and background info, then focus on a few appointments of special interest.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/from-cdc-labor-secretary-see-trumps-top-picks-cabinet-roles
Trump supporters were likely pleased that Trump chose Scott Bessant as Treasury Secretary. A longtime Trump economic adviser and founder of Key Square Group, Bessant is a major investment expert and supporter of low taxes, deregulation, government spending restraint and using tariffs as a trade negotiation tool.
Trump also named Russ Vought to head the Office of Management and Budget, a role he previously filled in Trump’s first term.
Scott Turner, an NFL veteran and former head of Trump’s White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council, was named to lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which could certainly use some revitalization. Democrats on the federal, state and local levels have spent billions if not trillions on housing, yet affordable housing seems to get scarcer and scarcer in blue states.
(Latest example: California Gov. Gavin Newsom promised to build 1200 tiny homes in Sacramento to house the homeless. A year later, not a single tiny home has opened. Maybe they're waiting for Kamala to have that government Internet access up and running.)
Some of Trump’s most headline-grabbing appointments include Dr. Marty Makary, an outspoken critic of the government’s COVID response, as commissioner of the FDA…Former White House adviser and Fox News contributor Dr. Sebastian Gorka as deputy assistant to the president and senior director for counterterrorism…And Oregon Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer as Labor Secretary and Dr. Janette Nesheiwat as Surgeon General. As you can read at the links below, those last two nominations raised some strenuous objections, and not from Democrats for a change, but from Trump supporters.
It’s been quite some time since we wrote in detail about the “long, proud history of the FBI” when it comes to spying and other wrongdoing. For a refresher --- very timely as the prospect of reforming our intel agencies actually seems within grasp --- Mark Levin’s must-see Sunday monologue runs through the highlights of our government’s repeated Constitution-trampling.
To those political enemies who would criticize President-elect Trump and anticipate him abusing his power, Levin points out that he was one of the most well-behaved and that real presidential misconduct started very early in our nation’s history, with second President John Adams, a brilliant but flawed human being. It was soon after our nation was formed, in 1798, that Adams signed the now-infamous Sedition Act, which effectively criminalized criticism of, well, John Adams. This was tough stuff: “If any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or procure...or knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous, and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States...with intent to defame the said government...shall be punished by fine not exceeding $2,000 and by imprisonment not exceeding 2 years.” Conspirators in such activity could be imprisoned by up to five years!
Americans could even be prosecuted under the Sedition Act for criticizing the Sedition Act.
Adams’ political enemy, Thomas Jefferson (who could legally be criticized all the live-long day) was OF COURSE opposed to this law, and once he was President allowed it to lapse. But before that, 17 indictments and 10 convictions went through, “many upon charges so flimsy as to be comical,” according to Peter McNamara of the Free Speech Center. So the beginning of our great nation was tainted by this affront to free political speech. Just ten years after the Constitution was ratified, we were already violating it to the extreme.
Then there was Abraham Lincoln, who in 1861 suspended habeas corpus from Washington DC to Philadelphia, meaning he could jail people without charging them with a crime. In 1862, in defiance of a federal appellate court ruling, he expanded this to cover the entire nation. Under the authority of the military, thousands of Americans, including political opponents, were imprisoned. Over 300 opposition newspapers were closed. Yes, it was wartime, but this was still unconstitutional political warfare.
In 1917 and 1918, respectively, Democrat Woodrow Wilson signed the Espionage Act and Sedition Act, which, according to Levin, “would come to be known as the most egregious assaults on free speech in our history.” Thousands were prosecuted under these laws, most notably Wilson’s own political opponent Eugene Debs, whose sentence was later commuted by Wilson’s successor, Republican Warren G. Harding.
Wilson implemented the most extensive censorship regime of any President, according to Levin. And the Espionage Act of 1917 lives on. We would add that “Special Counsel” Jack Smith used it to charge President Trump with “willful retention of sensitive national defense information.”
Then there’s the IRS. Documents prove that Franklin Roosevelt and his administration used it to destroy the careers of their political enemies, such as former Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon, a Republican whom they knew was innocent. FDR’s IRS also targeted newspaper publishers, among them William Randolph Hearst and Frank Gannett, who expressed opposition to the New Deal. This is just scratching the surface.
JFK’s IRS provided him with the supposedly private tax information on individuals, businesses and groups. Conservative groups were audited under “the Ideological Organizations Audit Program” (so, Lois Lerner wasn’t the first to do this). JFK used the FBI to spy on Martin Luther King, Jr., tapping his phones, bugging his house and monitoring his every move. Lyndon Johnson went further, using the FBI, IRS and CIA to spy on opponent Barry Goldwater, wiretapping his campaign headquarters.
According to Levin, they found out that one of Barry Goldwater’s staffers was gay, which Goldwater had known, and were threatening to use that. Goldwater called a senior member of LBJ’s campaign and said, “Please do not ruin this man’s life.” Ultimately, they chose not to.
Being paranoid about Robert Kennedy, LBJ sent FBI spies to the 1964 Democratic Convention, where they also continued monitoring Martin Luther King and other civil rights leaders. In ‘68, when Hubert Humphrey was nominated, LBJ had the FBI tap his phones as well, to check his loyalty about the Vietnam War. Again, this is just the tip of the iceberg, or spies-berg.
Levin skips over the Nixon administration, perhaps because their most famous spying is so well-known (but note how Democrats at the time pretended to be shocked by it.) He fast-forwards to President Obama and his AG Eric Holder, of whom even CNN’s Jake Tapper said, “The Obama administration has used the Espionage Act to go after whistleblowers who leaked to journalists...more than all previous administrations combined…” That would be seven times.
Recall that in 2013, the “Justice” Department seized, with no notice or justification, phone records for 20 telephone lines to AP offices and journalists’ home lines, affecting more than 100 journalists. Just a week later, the DOJ named FOX NEWS journalist James Rosen a criminal co-conspirator in a leak case, tracking his movements, seizing his email logs and even spying on his parents. Obama’s spying gets much, much worse; check out this story from 2016…
As for Obama-Biden and the Deep State’s actions against Trump, you know all about those horrendous abuses of power: the unrelenting lawfare against Trump and his associates; the spying on his campaign and White House; massive leaking (including Trump’s tax returns); the Russia Hoax; two sham impeachments; the raid on his home; and the agencies’ role in January 6 and the spying, tracking, raiding, arrests and convictions that followed. Not to mention the government’s online censorship activities.
So the good ol’ USA has a long history of abuse of power by its leaders. But not by Trump --- he was the victim of it. How ironic that the very one who’s actually trying to change this, to make this country the kind of open, honest place we’d like to think it is, is the one being hounded and feared and called a dictator. They accuse him of “destroying norms,” but if the norm he plans to destroy is government spying on American citizens and abusing its power for political reasons, then bring on the wrecking ball.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6365141316112
Speaking of January 6 abuses, BLAZE MEDIA has an update on their journalist Steve Baker, who recently chose to plead guilty to four misdemeanor charges (such as “milling” and “parading”) rather than endure a trial. As it happens, his pre-trial hearing was the day after the election, and he says the judge “really showed his intolerance.”
This judge, no doubt ticked off at the election outcome, wouldn’t even allow discovery. “He showed that he was going to be completely inflexible in the trial.” Baker says. “He dismissed all our motions...and the most important motion that we had is, we were requesting from the government discovery on the other 80 to 100 journalists that went through the building and weren’t charged with anything.” According to Baker, his judge is “best friends with Merrick Garland.”
This, combined with the prospect of a Washington DC jury pool, is what led him to change his plea to guilty.
After that, Baker says, the judge “made a serious unforced error” in chastising him. “He criticized none of the [alleged] behavior...but what he did criticize me [for]...[was] my remarks in my journalism about weaponized Department of Justice and the bias of the court.”
So, not his actions, but his words, critical of the government. (Ah, we come full circle to John Adams’ Sedition Act.) Steve Baker needs to be at the top of the list of those J6 political prisoners Trump pardons immediately after his inauguration. Watch this five-minute clip of his interview with Pat Gray here, highly recommended, in which he says the government is still at this, as it just SWAT-teamed and arrested an Austin man (a cancer patient) who had nonviolently entered the Capitol that day. This was done last week, AFTER the election.
https://www.theblaze.com/shows/pat-gray-unleashed/steve-baker-felon
When you have time, here’s investigative reporter Julie Kelly interviewing 22-year Marine Corps. Veteran, Purple Heart recipient and J6 political prisoner Christopher Kuehne.
Tristan Justice at THE FEDERALIST has an exclusive report on the evidence that shows the Pentagon deliberately delayed the deployment of the National Guard on January 6. Recall our recent story about the Inspector General “knowingly concealing” the extent of the delay and Rep. Barry Loudermilk’s letter to IG Robert P. Storch about this, insisting he correct his report.
Kash Patel, who was then chief of staff for the Defense Department, is quoted here from a FEDERALIST story back in March, insisting that President Trump authorized those 10,000 National Guard. It’s now crystal clear that Trump did just that and has told the truth about it all along.
Speaking of Kash Patel, he appeared Sunday on FOX NEWS with Maria Bartiromo to explain how he as FBI Director would restore public trust in the Bureau. Exposure of the corruption is a must, he said. “Put out the documents. Put out the evidence. We only have gotten halfway down the Russiagate hole.”
In other words, it’s far worse than we know after almost four years. Watch Patel’s interview at THE GATEWAY PUNDIT, which also features a rundown of the transgressions (that we know of) by current FBI Director Chris Wray.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/kash-patel-displays-why-he-is-best-pick/