Good morning!

Blessings on you and your family, and from all the Huckabee staff! 

Today's newsletter includes:

• Bible Verse Of The Day
• Even the U.S. POST OFFICE spies on Americans
• FBI: Congressional Baseball Shooter Wanted "Suicide By Cop"
• The 51st State
• Democratic Leadership
• Biden Gets The "Armenian Genocide" Right
• A Reader Writes Back...
• America The Beautiful

Sincerely,

Mike Huckabee

BIBLE VERSE OF THE DAY 

LORD, how manifold are thy works! in wisdom hast thou made them all: the earth is full of thy riches.

Psalm 104:24 KJV

Even the U.S. POST OFFICE spies on Americans

By Mike Huckabee

Neither rain nor snow nor heat nor gloom of night stays the United States Postal Service from the swift completion of its appointed task to monitor the social media of American citizens.

That’s not exactly the motto of the USPS, but we’ve just learned that it might as well be. Your snail mail (maybe even your ballot) might be delivered weeks late or end up in a dumpster in Poughkeepsie, but the Post Office knows what you’ve been saying on Twitter and Facebook and, if they find it “inflammatory," are forwarding it to the appropriate agencies. This is yet another example of Big Tech’s cozy relationship with the current administration.

Remember when the date of March 20 was in the news as a possible right-wing “domestic terrorism” follow-up to the January 6 Capitol Hill breach? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was using reports of social media activity surrounding this date to justify keeping thousands of National Guard troops on duty and the fencing with razor wire around Capitol Hill. Believe it or not, those reports came not from the FBI or the National Security Agency but from a special police force within our own U.S. Postal Service, called the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS).

The USPIS, which has about 1,200 members, is the oldest continually-operating federal law enforcement agency in our country, with the stated goal of protecting the postal service, its employees and its infrastructure. Their jurisdiction is supposed to be limited to crimes that affect the use of the mail, the postal service or postal employees.

But they’ve expanded operations and are now apparently in the surveillance (SPYING) business. These days, who isn’t?

The POST MILLENNIAL reported about the interception of communications regarding March 20, saying, “The U.S. Postal Service’s law enforcement arm is monitoring the social media activity of Americans to share ‘inflammatory’ content across government agencies. They quoted from this government bulletin: ‘Analysts with the USPIS Internet Covert Operations Program (iCOP) monitored significant activity regarding planned protests occurring internationally and domestically on March 20, 2021. Locations and times have been identified for these protests, which are being distributed online across multiple social media platforms, to include right-wing leaning Parler and Telegram accounts. Mar 20 was set for the World Wide Rally for Freedom and Democracy, an umbrella protest involving many anti-government groups and movements.”

As they reported, the bulletin also included screen shots of people ostensibly planning protests on social media, including Parler and Facebook. (I would add that Parler, said to have a right-wing user base, was hardly used to plan the Capitol Hill breach, while Facebook and Instagram were.) The bulletin justified its surveillance by suggesting that “Parler users have commented about their intent to use the rallies to engage in violence.”

Gosh, that sounds pretty serious. But at the same time, the report included this disclaimer: “[NO] INTELLIGENCE IS AVAILABLE TO SUGGEST THE LEGITIMACY OF THESE THREATS.” (Emphasis mine.) Incidentally, did any sort of violent protest by Trump supporters take place on March 20? NO.

“ICOP analysts are currently monitoring these social media channels for any potential threats stemming from the scheduled protests and will disseminate intelligence updates as needed,” the bulletin said.

In other words, the USPS defends their monitoring of social media by saying there was activity suggesting protests by “anti-government” groups would happen on March 20, even though they had no intelligence to support that such threats were even real. Doesn’t matter, though; they’ll continue monitoring for potential threats!

The USPS, in response to questions about this program, responded with typical bureaucratic boilerplate blah-blah: “The U.S. Postal Inspection Service is the primary law enforcement, crime prevention, and security arm of the U.S. Postal Service. The Internet Covert Operations Program is a function within the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, which assesses threats to the U.S. Postal Service employees and its infrastructure by monitoring publicly available open source information.”

That answers none of our questions. So why is the Post Office monitoring social media posts? Unless mail delivery is going to impacted by a rally on Capitol Hill –- which seems unlikely, considering these are quite common –- this work doesn’t appear to be within their jurisdiction.

Geoffrey Stone, who has investigated the National Security Agency’s surveillance program, has said he doesn’t think “the Postal Service has the degree of sophistication that you would want if you were dealing with national security issues of this sort.” He wondered why some other federal agency wasn’t carrying out this mission. “There are so many other federal agencies that could do this,” he said, “I don’t understand why the Post Office would be doing it. There is no need...you’ve got FBI, Homeland Security and so on, so...I don’t understand why the government would go to the Postal Service for examining the internet for security issues.”

And, again, monitoring Americans seems beyond the scope of their assigned duties. Rachel Levinson-Waldman, who works at the Brennan Center for Justice, questioned this, too. “Based on the very minimal information that’s available online,” she said, “it appears that [iCOP] is meant to root out misuse of the postal service by online actors, which doesn’t seem to encompass what’s going on here. It’s not at all clear why their mandate would include monitoring of social media that’s unrelated to use of the postal system.”

She added that if this is “lawfully protected” speech, even the kind we might think is objectionable, then monitoring it raises “serious constitutional concerns.”

It appears that even when we find platforms such as Parler that don’t ban us outright for perfectly legitimate speech about vaccines, masks, the election and other largely forbidden topics, we will still be monitored (SPIED ON) by the government. I wish I could tell you more about how, specifically, the Post Office is coordinating with Big Tech to conduct this monitoring; when they started doing it; or if the Internet Covert Operations Program continues its undercover work. Our guess is that it does –- why should the Biden administration stop spying on “insurrectionist” Trump supporters? –- but those details continue to elude.

THE GATEWAY PUNDIT reported on this as well, and they believe the Post Office developed their list of conservatives to spy on from a list of “Build The Wall” donors they obtained a few days before the 2020 Republican Convention. They can’t prove it, but they offer circumstantial evidence. And if you think Post Office cops aren’t as rough as regular cops, check out how a team of 15 USPIS officers conducted the arrest of Trump supporter and wheelchair-bound triple-amputee war hero Brian Kolfage.

FBI: Congressional Baseball Shooter Wanted "Suicide By Cop"

By Mike Huckabee

Just what Americans need: one more reason to lose respect for the FBI. It’s been revealed that when a deranged leftist opened fire on Republicans during a Congressional baseball game practice, nearly killing Rep. Steve Scalise, the FBI ruled that his motivation was “suicide by cop.” Yes, it wasn’t a politically-motivated hate crime. He just wanted the police to shoot him.

Republican Rep. Brad Westrup of Ohio revealed that stunning ruling in a hearing this week, adding that even FBI agents who investigated disagreed with it. Westrup said he was there that day: “We know from [the shooter’s] social media posts that he hated Republicans and that he hated President Trump. He loved Bernie Sanders and he held left-wing beliefs. We know he carried in his pocket that day a target list with names of Republican congressmen…that included their physical descriptions.” He noted that the shooter was carrying 136 rounds, when it only takes one shot at the cops to get them to kill you.

Westrup said the shooter may have believed he could change the balance of power in the House by killing 20 or 30 Republican members, which would mean this was what a real attempted insurrection would look like. Westrup wants an investigation into why top FBI officials ignored the facts and their own agents to arrive at such a preposterous conclusion.

And maybe he’ll get one, since even some Democrats said they supported him. Calling that deliberate, planned assault “suicide by cop” is like claiming that the 9/11 hijackers committed a botched landing.

While we’re on the subject of sweeping armed assaults on Republicans under the rug, Tucker Carlson is getting flak from the left for saying that the Capitol police officer who fatally shot unarmed Republican protester Ashli Babbitt should be held to the same scrutiny as Derek Chavin, instead of having his name kept secret and his job protected. I’m hearing a lot of outrage from the left, but not a lot of rational arguments for why he’s wrong.

The 51st State

By Mike Huckabee

Yesterday, on a 216-208 vote, House Democrats voted to make the District of Columbia the 51st state. It’s wrapped in a lot of rhetoric about taxation without representation (Democrats oppose that?), but it’s really about padding Congress with two more Democrat Senators and at least one more guaranteed House seat.

You can read more about it at Townhall.com, where Spencer Brown gives this naked power grab the respect it deserves. Unless Democrats can eliminate the Senate filibuster, I assume this is as far as it will go. If they do accomplish that, who knows? Although Brown points out that this is expressly forbidden by the Constitution, so they’re trying to amend the Constitution with a party-line vote in Congress. One hopes that even Chief Justice Roberts would recognize that as a constitutional no-no.

Democratic Leadership

By Mike Huckabee

If you’re attempting to make any logical sense out of the current Democratic “leadership” of America, try to wrap your head around this:

It’s an unconstitutional imposition of government on the right of physicians to practice medicine when states bar them from giving unproven drugs and hormones or irreversible body-altering surgery to minors who think they’re transgender. But it’s perfectly okay for President Biden to force religious hospitals and medical practitioners to perform those exact same procedures against their consciences and their Hippocratic Oath.