Advertisement

Latest News

December 26, 2022
|

(Adapted from the book, “God, Guns, Grits and Gravy”: https://www.amazon.com/Guns-Grits-Gravy-Mike-Huckabee/dp/1250060990)

Let's be fair in acknowledging that government grows because the people demand it. I found out as Governor that even self-proclaimed libertarians and "real conservatives" are against more government…until they are for it.

We end up with laws being passed and boards, agencies and commissions being created because people sit around whining about something or somebody they don't like and sooner or later, someone pipes up and says, "There ought to be a law!" It might be a law to make people pick up their dog's poop on the sidewalk or a law declaring that when a pedophile molests a little girl, he has to serve life in prison. No argument there, but just know that when someone says, "There ought to be a law," you'll need to reach into your wallet. It's going to cost you.

Of course, no one thinks that the part of government they want is bad—it's "the right thing to do." But once we create a law, we have to hire someone to see that it's being obeyed. Then we need someone to enforce the law. And someone to adjudicate the law if it's broken. And someone to carry out the punishment of the person who broke the law. (Of course, you could go too far the other way and save money by defunding the police and not enforcing any laws – but that’s crazy talk!)

In a perfect world — if all people were naturally good neighbors who never did selfish things but always acted in the best interest of others — we wouldn't need nearly so many laws. The proliferation of laws is directly proportional to our failure to live by the “Golden Rule" that my mother drilled into me when I was growing up: “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." Many of our laws exist to deal with those situations caused by people who just "do unto others."  

No one wants to be beaten to a pulp by a thug, so if everyone abided by the Golden Rule, no one would get beaten by a thug. By definition, there would be no thugs. There would be no domestic violence because no one wants to be a victim of domestic violence. There would be no theft because no one wants to have his or her stuff stolen. There would be no littering because no one wants his own yard covered in someone else's trash.

We pass laws when people don't behave kindly toward others. By and large, that's what inspires someone to say, "There ought to be a law!" And the next thing you know, there is one. Soon there are pages and pages of them.

This is why I feel I must educate my hardcore libertarian friends who say, "You can't legislate morality. I don't want the government involved in moral or social issues." But that's exactly why we pass laws at all. When people act immorally or without regard for others, laws get passed to set a standard of behavior that would have existed naturally and organically if we all demonstrated a little empathy.

A free people can't exist in a moral vacuum. (This is why people on social media tend to end up in echo chambers until they hate, demonize and want to silence or kill anyone who disagrees with them – because social media is a moral vacuum.)

Liberty is more abundant when the personal behavior of the citizenry is abundantly moral. When people steal, attack, defraud, abuse or kill, citizens want the government to crack down. Laws will be passed and government will grow to more clearly define the boundaries of acceptable behavior.  When someone violates our law, it costs money to investigate the crime, arrest the criminal, pay for his trial (and often for his attorney), and incarcerate him. The cost just for incarceration is staggering. In most every state, it costs more to keep someone in prison for one year than it would to provide college tuition, room and board, books, and even some spending money! Although admittedly, with some colleges these days, he might learn more in prison. 

The monetary burden created by people who act in contradiction to the morality of the community is far greater than most people realize. It's the cost of paying sandblasters to remove graffiti from buildings and bridges; the cost of juvenile detention homes; the cost of more expensive insurance premiums to cover theft; the cost of policing, surveillance, and enforcement on our streets; and the higher cost of products on the shelves to cover stores' losses due to shoplifting. And while some call for longer prison sentences and the end of parole, no matter how justified, those modifications dramatically increase a state's prison budget.

It was my observation that some people who labeled themselves "fiscal conservatives" never saw the disconnect between their call to increase the cost of government and their pride in not raising taxes to pay for it. This is where priorities must come into play; an increase in one area of the budget means a decrease — a real decrease, not just a fool-the-eye accounting trick — somewhere else. States can’t just print more money or stick our as-yet unborn grandkids with the bill: they actually have to pay for things.

I don't think we need more money in government; I do think we need more morality and decency in our culture. Just as numerous cultural forces have brought our standards down — way down — other influences in society can surely reverse that trend. And if we really want the government to "get off my lawn," then part of the solution is better citizens obeying the laws we already have so we don't have to pass new laws to further explain and expand the old ones. But it’s going to take a revival of some archaic concepts that a lot of people have been working for years to eradicate, like personal responsibility, empathy for others (even if they hold different views) and the Golden Rule.

The great writer Tom Wolfe said it best, in his satirical novel “The Bonfire of the Vanities,” through the character of Judge White (played in the movie by Morgan Freeman) as he speaks from the bench:

"Let me tell you what justice is. Justice is the law, and the law is man's feeble attempt to set down the principles of decency. Decency! And decency is not a deal. It isn't an angle, or a contract, or a hustle! Decency...decency is what your grandmother taught you! It's in your bones! Now you go home. Go home and be decent people. Be decent."

Leave a Comment

Note: Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Information
Your Comment
BBML accepted!
Captcha

More Stories

Remembering September 11th

The Meaning of Memorial Day

Comments 11-20 of 26

  • Joe HUFFMAN

    12/28/2022 11:31 AM

    Check out this Article from AmericanThinker https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/12/omnibus_fraud.html

  • Peter Ward

    07/08/2022 02:04 PM

    The moral decline is not going to change. Politicians and big business now act like criminals are a useful tool for power and control. They will not be giving it up anymore than the thugs in Peking would either. Freedom and liberty are out of luck. End times.

  • Richard Crook

    07/06/2022 08:40 PM

    Too often today people follow the alternate "golden rule", 'do unto others before they do unto you '.

  • Debbie DePaul

    07/06/2022 12:56 AM

    Which is why every law should have a sunset date, and if it doesn’t then one should automatically should be applied. Let’s make it a law!:)

  • Mike Tritle

    07/05/2022 02:54 PM

    I've been saying stuff like this for years. Always interesting when the "other side" flames me for the taking the "cult christian morality" side that they never come back with an answer to my question, "How is your current way working out for all of us?" Hope you don't mind, but I copied and pasted this to my Facebook Page. Perfect essay to provoke thought in light of not only the Independence Day holiday, but the tragedy happening just 60 miles from my home yesterday.

    When bad is good, good is riduculed and deviance celebrated, chaos will result! Those are my words, use as you wish!
    God Bless!
    Mike

  • David R Jones

    07/05/2022 09:00 AM

    Thank you for such a great explanation of what should be taught and instilled in all Americans! I am a retired kindergarten teacher. We said the Pledge of Allegiance every day. We discussed the stripes, colors and why the flag was made the way it was. I played patriotic songs and we marched around the room as they played. I installed and modeled behavior of respecting each other and that we were "family" in our classroom. We may not agree or like each other always, but we have to live with each other and have to do it by listening to each other! We celebrated the holidays, not just Christmas or Thanksgiving, but Presidents Day, Matin Luther Day and we very much discussed the 4th of July! I installed in my students to be proud of who they are and where they lived! If a student questioned me, myself, along with whole class discussed it. I never "shut down" a student's opinion or, especially his/her question. I always had a large copy of Pledge of Allegiance in front of classroom. Each day as we repeated it, I would have a different student use pointer to follow each word as we spoke it. I wanted the students to focus on each word as it was spoken. Words are powerful and pointing to each word was a way of enhancing the power of the Pledge. If someone asked about a certain word, and students did, we discussed the word and its meaning. Understanding is the "key" to learning and understanding that lasts a lifetime! Oh yes, I taught in a lower social economic area and my school was a Title 1 school. The students left me at end of school year with, I believe, a better understanding of family and respect for their country and its history!
    Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts in article. If I were teaching still, I would have introduced them to that young girl who was so brave alerting the neighbors about the British. We would have discussed the hero and who would have liked to be her! No doubt many hands would have been raised!

  • Dobbin Callahan

    07/04/2022 10:00 PM

    This is among the best written, most cogent articles I have read. I guess I must now buy the book! We may disagree on animal research, but I admire everything else you stand for.

  • Gary Stilwell

    07/04/2022 09:09 PM

    I could never had said this as eloquently as you --I believe it to my core!

  • John Ryan

    07/04/2022 09:02 PM

    I must agree with C. Spenser van Gulick quite a few hours ahead of me! He states the situation very well and appropriately to the voice you bring to our national debates in these times.
    The battle to restore a sense of true decency in moral behavior and a solid, virtuous education - dare I say a classical education - is likely to be long and arduous, but it will be well worth it for our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren.

  • Robert Janovick

    07/04/2022 08:40 PM

    A law with no punishment is merely a suggestion! "(Of course, you could go too far the other way and save money by defunding the police and not enforcing any laws – but that’s crazy talk!)"